mossambicis Oreochromis肠道菌群特征及其与人工渔场微生物群的相互作用。

Sheng Bi, Han Lai, Dingli Guo, Huadong Yi, Haiyang Li, Xuange Liu, Qiuxian Chen, Jiahui Chen, Zhilun Zhang, Xuchong Wei, Guifeng Li, Guorong Xin
{"title":"mossambicis Oreochromis肠道菌群特征及其与人工渔场微生物群的相互作用。","authors":"Sheng Bi,&nbsp;Han Lai,&nbsp;Dingli Guo,&nbsp;Huadong Yi,&nbsp;Haiyang Li,&nbsp;Xuange Liu,&nbsp;Qiuxian Chen,&nbsp;Jiahui Chen,&nbsp;Zhilun Zhang,&nbsp;Xuchong Wei,&nbsp;Guifeng Li,&nbsp;Guorong Xin","doi":"10.1186/s12862-023-02120-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial habitats can allow many fish to flock together and interact and have been widely used to restore and protect fishery resources. The piece of research intends to elucidate the relationship of microbial communities between tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) intestines and artificial fishery habitats (water and sediments). Hence, 16 S rDNA sequencing technology was used to study the bacterial communities from intestines, water, and sediments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the tilapia intestines had the lowest richness of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and the lowest diversity of the bacterial community compared to water and sediments. The intestine, water, and sediment microbial communities shared many OTUs. Overall, 663 shared OTUs were identified from the tilapia intestines (76.20%), the surrounding water (71.14%), and sediment (56.86%) in artificial habitats. However, there were unique OTUs that were detected in different sample types. There were 81, 77 and 112 unique OTUs observed in tilapia intestines, the surrounding water and sediment, respectively. Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were the most common and dominant bacterial phyla between the tilapia intestines and habitats. In the two groups, the microbial communities were similar in the taxonomic composition but different in the abundance of bacterial phyla. Interestingly, Firmicutes increased, while Fusobacteria decreased in artificial habitats. These findings indicated that the artificial habitats had fewer effects on the water environment and indicated that the mode of artificial habitats could have an effect on the enriched bacteria in the tilapia intestines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study analysed the bacterial communities of artificial habitats from the intestines, water, and sediments, which can explain the relationship between the tilapia intestines and habitats and strengthen the value of ecological services provided by artificial habitats.</p>","PeriodicalId":9127,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ecology and Evolution","volume":"23 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The characteristics of the intestinal bacterial community from Oreochromis mossambicus and its interaction with microbiota from artificial fishery habitats.\",\"authors\":\"Sheng Bi,&nbsp;Han Lai,&nbsp;Dingli Guo,&nbsp;Huadong Yi,&nbsp;Haiyang Li,&nbsp;Xuange Liu,&nbsp;Qiuxian Chen,&nbsp;Jiahui Chen,&nbsp;Zhilun Zhang,&nbsp;Xuchong Wei,&nbsp;Guifeng Li,&nbsp;Guorong Xin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12862-023-02120-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial habitats can allow many fish to flock together and interact and have been widely used to restore and protect fishery resources. The piece of research intends to elucidate the relationship of microbial communities between tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) intestines and artificial fishery habitats (water and sediments). Hence, 16 S rDNA sequencing technology was used to study the bacterial communities from intestines, water, and sediments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the tilapia intestines had the lowest richness of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and the lowest diversity of the bacterial community compared to water and sediments. The intestine, water, and sediment microbial communities shared many OTUs. Overall, 663 shared OTUs were identified from the tilapia intestines (76.20%), the surrounding water (71.14%), and sediment (56.86%) in artificial habitats. However, there were unique OTUs that were detected in different sample types. There were 81, 77 and 112 unique OTUs observed in tilapia intestines, the surrounding water and sediment, respectively. Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were the most common and dominant bacterial phyla between the tilapia intestines and habitats. In the two groups, the microbial communities were similar in the taxonomic composition but different in the abundance of bacterial phyla. Interestingly, Firmicutes increased, while Fusobacteria decreased in artificial habitats. These findings indicated that the artificial habitats had fewer effects on the water environment and indicated that the mode of artificial habitats could have an effect on the enriched bacteria in the tilapia intestines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study analysed the bacterial communities of artificial habitats from the intestines, water, and sediments, which can explain the relationship between the tilapia intestines and habitats and strengthen the value of ecological services provided by artificial habitats.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165841/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-023-02120-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-023-02120-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人工生境可以使多种鱼类聚集在一起并相互作用,已广泛用于恢复和保护渔业资源。研究罗非鱼(Oreochromis mossambicus)肠道微生物群落与人工渔业生境(水体和沉积物)的关系。因此,采用16s rDNA测序技术对肠道、水体和沉积物中的细菌群落进行了研究。结果:与水体和沉积物相比,罗非鱼肠道的操作分类单位(OTUs)丰富度和细菌群落多样性最低。肠道、水和沉积物微生物群落共享许多otu。在罗非鱼肠道(76.20%)、周围水体(71.14%)和沉积物(56.86%)中共鉴定出663个共有otu。然而,在不同的样品类型中检测到独特的otu。罗非鱼肠道、周围水体和沉积物中分别有81个、77个和112个独特的otu。变形菌门、蓝藻菌门、放线菌门、厚壁菌门、梭菌门和拟杆菌门是罗非鱼肠道与栖息地之间最常见和最占优势的细菌门。两组微生物群落在分类组成上相似,但在菌门丰度上存在差异。有趣的是,在人工栖息地中,厚壁菌门增加,而梭杆菌门减少。这些结果表明,人工生境对水环境的影响较小,表明人工生境的模式可能对罗非鱼肠道中富集的细菌产生影响。结论:本研究从罗非鱼肠子、水体和沉积物三个方面分析了罗非鱼人工生境的细菌群落,可以解释罗非鱼肠子与生境之间的关系,增强人工生境的生态服务价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The characteristics of the intestinal bacterial community from Oreochromis mossambicus and its interaction with microbiota from artificial fishery habitats.

Background: Artificial habitats can allow many fish to flock together and interact and have been widely used to restore and protect fishery resources. The piece of research intends to elucidate the relationship of microbial communities between tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) intestines and artificial fishery habitats (water and sediments). Hence, 16 S rDNA sequencing technology was used to study the bacterial communities from intestines, water, and sediments.

Results: The results showed that the tilapia intestines had the lowest richness of Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and the lowest diversity of the bacterial community compared to water and sediments. The intestine, water, and sediment microbial communities shared many OTUs. Overall, 663 shared OTUs were identified from the tilapia intestines (76.20%), the surrounding water (71.14%), and sediment (56.86%) in artificial habitats. However, there were unique OTUs that were detected in different sample types. There were 81, 77 and 112 unique OTUs observed in tilapia intestines, the surrounding water and sediment, respectively. Proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, and Bacteroidetes were the most common and dominant bacterial phyla between the tilapia intestines and habitats. In the two groups, the microbial communities were similar in the taxonomic composition but different in the abundance of bacterial phyla. Interestingly, Firmicutes increased, while Fusobacteria decreased in artificial habitats. These findings indicated that the artificial habitats had fewer effects on the water environment and indicated that the mode of artificial habitats could have an effect on the enriched bacteria in the tilapia intestines.

Conclusions: This study analysed the bacterial communities of artificial habitats from the intestines, water, and sediments, which can explain the relationship between the tilapia intestines and habitats and strengthen the value of ecological services provided by artificial habitats.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genomics of hybrid parallel origin in Aquilegia ecalcarata Resolving the phylogeny of Thladiantha (Cucurbitaceae) with three different target capture pipelines Peripatric speciation within Torreya fargesii (Taxaceae) in the Hengduan Mountains inferred from multi-loci phylogeography Ecosystem restoration, regeneration and rewilding. Native amphibian toxin reduces invasive crayfish feeding with potential benefits to stream biodiversity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1