用氨茶碱或茶碱预防和治疗硬脊膜穿刺后头痛:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Reza Barati-Boldaji, Sara Shojaei-Zarghani, Manoosh Mehrabi, Afshin Amini, Ali Reza Safarpour
{"title":"用氨茶碱或茶碱预防和治疗硬脊膜穿刺后头痛:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Reza Barati-Boldaji,&nbsp;Sara Shojaei-Zarghani,&nbsp;Manoosh Mehrabi,&nbsp;Afshin Amini,&nbsp;Ali Reza Safarpour","doi":"10.17085/apm.22247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common complications in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the therapeutic and prophylactic effects of aminophylline and theophylline on PDPH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were identified by searching the following electronic databases, without language restriction, until June 2020: Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Cochrane Library-CENTRAL, and CINAHL Complete. Random effects models were used to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to assess the therapeutic and prophylactic effects of aminophylline and theophylline on PDPH, respectively. The Cochrane tool was used for the quality assessment of the included studies. The certainty of the evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,349 initial records, 15 met our eligibility criteria (6 studies on therapeutic and 9 on prophylactic effects). A significant reduction in the pain score was observed following aminophylline/theophylline treatment (SMD = -1.67; 95% CI, -2.28 to -1.05; P < 0.001, I2 = 84.7%; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the therapeutic effect was significantly higher when these agents were compared to placebo than when conventional therapies were used. The risk of PDPH after aminophylline administration was not significantly reduced (RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.31; P = 0.290).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Theophylline and aminophylline have therapeutic, but not prophylactic, effects on PDPH.</p>","PeriodicalId":7801,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"18 2","pages":"177-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/6a/apm-22247.PMC10183611.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-dural puncture headache prevention and treatment with aminophylline or theophylline: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Reza Barati-Boldaji,&nbsp;Sara Shojaei-Zarghani,&nbsp;Manoosh Mehrabi,&nbsp;Afshin Amini,&nbsp;Ali Reza Safarpour\",\"doi\":\"10.17085/apm.22247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common complications in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the therapeutic and prophylactic effects of aminophylline and theophylline on PDPH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were identified by searching the following electronic databases, without language restriction, until June 2020: Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Cochrane Library-CENTRAL, and CINAHL Complete. Random effects models were used to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to assess the therapeutic and prophylactic effects of aminophylline and theophylline on PDPH, respectively. The Cochrane tool was used for the quality assessment of the included studies. The certainty of the evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,349 initial records, 15 met our eligibility criteria (6 studies on therapeutic and 9 on prophylactic effects). A significant reduction in the pain score was observed following aminophylline/theophylline treatment (SMD = -1.67; 95% CI, -2.28 to -1.05; P < 0.001, I2 = 84.7%; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the therapeutic effect was significantly higher when these agents were compared to placebo than when conventional therapies were used. The risk of PDPH after aminophylline administration was not significantly reduced (RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.31; P = 0.290).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Theophylline and aminophylline have therapeutic, but not prophylactic, effects on PDPH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"177-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/6a/apm-22247.PMC10183611.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.22247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:硬脊膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是脊髓麻醉患者最常见的并发症之一。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估氨茶碱和茶碱对PDPH的治疗和预防作用。方法:截至2020年6月,通过检索以下电子数据库(不受语言限制)确定相关研究:Scopus、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Google Scholar、Web of Science、Cochrane Library-CENTRAL和CINAHL Complete。采用随机效应模型计算标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(95% CI)的风险比(rr),分别评估氨茶碱和茶碱对PDPH的治疗和预防作用。采用Cochrane工具对纳入的研究进行质量评估。证据的确定性采用建议评估、发展和评价分级法进行评级。结果:在1349项初始记录中,15项符合我们的资格标准(6项研究用于治疗作用,9项研究用于预防作用)。氨茶碱/茶碱治疗后疼痛评分显著降低(SMD = -1.67;95% CI, -2.28 ~ -1.05;P < 0.001, i2 = 84.7%;P < 0.001)。亚组分析显示,与安慰剂相比,使用这些药物的治疗效果明显高于使用常规疗法。给药后PDPH的风险没有显著降低(RR = 0.74;95% CI, 0.42 ~ 1.31;P = 0.290)。结论:茶碱和氨茶碱对PDPH有治疗作用,但无预防作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-dural puncture headache prevention and treatment with aminophylline or theophylline: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common complications in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the therapeutic and prophylactic effects of aminophylline and theophylline on PDPH.

Methods: Relevant studies were identified by searching the following electronic databases, without language restriction, until June 2020: Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Cochrane Library-CENTRAL, and CINAHL Complete. Random effects models were used to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to assess the therapeutic and prophylactic effects of aminophylline and theophylline on PDPH, respectively. The Cochrane tool was used for the quality assessment of the included studies. The certainty of the evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.

Results: Of the 1,349 initial records, 15 met our eligibility criteria (6 studies on therapeutic and 9 on prophylactic effects). A significant reduction in the pain score was observed following aminophylline/theophylline treatment (SMD = -1.67; 95% CI, -2.28 to -1.05; P < 0.001, I2 = 84.7%; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the therapeutic effect was significantly higher when these agents were compared to placebo than when conventional therapies were used. The risk of PDPH after aminophylline administration was not significantly reduced (RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.31; P = 0.290).

Conclusions: Theophylline and aminophylline have therapeutic, but not prophylactic, effects on PDPH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anesthetic neurotoxicity in the developing brain: an update on theinsights and implications for fetal surgery Extubation and removal of supraglottic airway devices in pediatric anesthesia Relationship between intraoperative requirement for anesthetics and postoperative analgesic consumption in laparoscopic colectomy: a randomized controlled double-blinded study Opioid-free anesthesia using a combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial How does circadian rhythm affect postoperative pain after pediatric acute appendicitis surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1