2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省呼吸道疾病患者自我报告的医疗服务可及性差异来自与哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病患者共同开展的一项调查的见解。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Chronic Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/14799731231172518
Aneisha Collins-Fairclough, Prabjit Barn, A J Hirsch-Allen, Karen Rideout, Erin M Shellington, Winnie Lo, Tony Lanier, Jim Johnson, Adam Butcher, Sian-Hoe Cheong, Carmen Rempel, Nardia Strydom, Pat G Camp, Christopher Carlsten
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省呼吸道疾病患者自我报告的医疗服务可及性差异来自与哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病患者共同开展的一项调查的见解。","authors":"Aneisha Collins-Fairclough,&nbsp;Prabjit Barn,&nbsp;A J Hirsch-Allen,&nbsp;Karen Rideout,&nbsp;Erin M Shellington,&nbsp;Winnie Lo,&nbsp;Tony Lanier,&nbsp;Jim Johnson,&nbsp;Adam Butcher,&nbsp;Sian-Hoe Cheong,&nbsp;Carmen Rempel,&nbsp;Nardia Strydom,&nbsp;Pat G Camp,&nbsp;Christopher Carlsten","doi":"10.1177/14799731231172518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients' perspectives on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their access to asthma and COPD healthcare could inform better, more equitable care delivery. We demonstrate this topic using British Columbia (BC), Canada, where the impact of the pandemic has not been described. We co-designed a cross-sectional survey with patient partners and administered it to a convenience sample of people living with asthma and COPD in BC between September 2020 and March 2021. We aimed to understand how access to healthcare for these conditions was affected during the pandemic. The survey asked respondents to report their characteristics, access to healthcare for asthma and COPD, types of services they found disrupted and telehealth (telephone or video appointment) use during the pandemic. We analysed 433 responses and found that access to healthcare for asthma and COPD was lower during the pandemic than pre-pandemic (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Specialty care services were most frequently reported as disrupted, while primary care, home care and diagnostics were least disrupted. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that access during the pandemic was positively associated with self-assessed financial ability (OR = 22.0, 95% CI: 7.0 - 84.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001, reference is disagreeing with having financial ability) and living in medium-sized urban areas (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.0 - 5.2, <i>p</i> = 0.04, reference is rural areas). These disparities in access should be validated post-pandemic to confirm whether they still persist. They also indicate the continued relevance of exploring approaches for more equitable healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"20 ","pages":"14799731231172518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/4e/10.1177_14799731231172518.PMC10184213.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in self-reported healthcare access for airways disease in British Columbia, Canada, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Insights from a survey co-developed with people living with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.\",\"authors\":\"Aneisha Collins-Fairclough,&nbsp;Prabjit Barn,&nbsp;A J Hirsch-Allen,&nbsp;Karen Rideout,&nbsp;Erin M Shellington,&nbsp;Winnie Lo,&nbsp;Tony Lanier,&nbsp;Jim Johnson,&nbsp;Adam Butcher,&nbsp;Sian-Hoe Cheong,&nbsp;Carmen Rempel,&nbsp;Nardia Strydom,&nbsp;Pat G Camp,&nbsp;Christopher Carlsten\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14799731231172518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients' perspectives on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their access to asthma and COPD healthcare could inform better, more equitable care delivery. We demonstrate this topic using British Columbia (BC), Canada, where the impact of the pandemic has not been described. We co-designed a cross-sectional survey with patient partners and administered it to a convenience sample of people living with asthma and COPD in BC between September 2020 and March 2021. We aimed to understand how access to healthcare for these conditions was affected during the pandemic. The survey asked respondents to report their characteristics, access to healthcare for asthma and COPD, types of services they found disrupted and telehealth (telephone or video appointment) use during the pandemic. We analysed 433 responses and found that access to healthcare for asthma and COPD was lower during the pandemic than pre-pandemic (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Specialty care services were most frequently reported as disrupted, while primary care, home care and diagnostics were least disrupted. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that access during the pandemic was positively associated with self-assessed financial ability (OR = 22.0, 95% CI: 7.0 - 84.0, <i>p</i> < 0.001, reference is disagreeing with having financial ability) and living in medium-sized urban areas (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.0 - 5.2, <i>p</i> = 0.04, reference is rural areas). These disparities in access should be validated post-pandemic to confirm whether they still persist. They also indicate the continued relevance of exploring approaches for more equitable healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"14799731231172518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/27/4e/10.1177_14799731231172518.PMC10184213.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731231172518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731231172518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者对COVID-19大流行对其获得哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病医疗保健影响的看法可以为更好、更公平的医疗服务提供信息。我们以加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)为例来说明这一主题,那里没有描述大流行的影响。我们与患者合作伙伴共同设计了一项横断面调查,并在2020年9月至2021年3月期间对BC省哮喘和COPD患者的方便样本进行了调查。我们的目的是了解在大流行期间,这些疾病的医疗保健是如何受到影响的。调查要求受访者报告他们的特点、获得哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病医疗保健的机会、他们发现中断的服务类型以及大流行期间远程医疗(电话或视频预约)的使用情况。我们分析了433份回复,发现大流行期间哮喘和COPD的医疗保健可及性低于大流行前(p < 0.001)。专业护理服务最常被报告中断,而初级保健、家庭护理和诊断中断最少。多变量logistic回归显示,大流行期间的可及性与自我评估的财务能力(OR = 22.0, 95% CI: 7.0 - 84.0, p < 0.001,参考文献不同意拥有财务能力)和居住在中等城市地区(OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.0 - 5.2, p = 0.04,参考文献为农村地区)呈正相关。应在大流行后验证这些获取方面的差异,以确认它们是否仍然存在。它们还表明,探索更公平的医疗保健方法的持续相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disparities in self-reported healthcare access for airways disease in British Columbia, Canada, during the COVID-19 pandemic. Insights from a survey co-developed with people living with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Patients' perspectives on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their access to asthma and COPD healthcare could inform better, more equitable care delivery. We demonstrate this topic using British Columbia (BC), Canada, where the impact of the pandemic has not been described. We co-designed a cross-sectional survey with patient partners and administered it to a convenience sample of people living with asthma and COPD in BC between September 2020 and March 2021. We aimed to understand how access to healthcare for these conditions was affected during the pandemic. The survey asked respondents to report their characteristics, access to healthcare for asthma and COPD, types of services they found disrupted and telehealth (telephone or video appointment) use during the pandemic. We analysed 433 responses and found that access to healthcare for asthma and COPD was lower during the pandemic than pre-pandemic (p < 0.001). Specialty care services were most frequently reported as disrupted, while primary care, home care and diagnostics were least disrupted. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that access during the pandemic was positively associated with self-assessed financial ability (OR = 22.0, 95% CI: 7.0 - 84.0, p < 0.001, reference is disagreeing with having financial ability) and living in medium-sized urban areas (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.0 - 5.2, p = 0.04, reference is rural areas). These disparities in access should be validated post-pandemic to confirm whether they still persist. They also indicate the continued relevance of exploring approaches for more equitable healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
期刊最新文献
Eosinopenia in bronchiectasis: A novel biomarker for morbidity and mortality. Tracheal mucosal keratosis: Case discussion and literature review. Active cycle of breathing technique versus oscillating positive expiratory pressure therapy: Effect on lung function in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia; A feasibility study. Pulmonary rehabilitation healthcare professionals understanding and experiences of the protected characteristics of service users: A qualitative analysis. Is videoconference pulmonary rehabilitation associated with improvements in knowledge in people living with COPD? A propensity-matched service-evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1