临床督导中的反黑人种族主义:异步模拟接触促进反思性实践。

MedEdPublish (2016) Pub Date : 2023-04-14 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.12688/mep.19487.2
Amanda J Calhoun, Andrés Martin, Ayodola Adigun, Shirley D Alleyne, Kammarauche Aneni, Tara Thompson-Felix, Andrea Asnes, Marco A de Carvalho-Filho, Laelia Benoit, Inginia Genao
{"title":"临床督导中的反黑人种族主义:异步模拟接触促进反思性实践。","authors":"Amanda J Calhoun, Andrés Martin, Ayodola Adigun, Shirley D Alleyne, Kammarauche Aneni, Tara Thompson-Felix, Andrea Asnes, Marco A de Carvalho-Filho, Laelia Benoit, Inginia Genao","doi":"10.12688/mep.19487.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Racist interactions in clinical practice remain a pervasive reality for Black healthcare providers. We sought to develop a framework to inform supervisors' actions when confronting racism in clinical practice and protecting trainees under their oversight. Methods We conducted a qualitative study in which experienced supervisors responded to seven short, videotaped interactions between: 1) Black trainees and a simulated patient (SP) in a racist role; 2) the trainees and their respective supervisors; and 3) the trainees and their supervisors together with the SP. The clinical exchanges exemplified different types of racist <i>(entrenching)</i> or antiracist <i>(uprooting)</i> behaviors by the supervisors. After viewing each clip, participants wrote their reflections confidentially; they later joined a structured debriefing together. We used thematic analysis to identify supervisors' behavioral patterns when confronting racist interactions. Results Based on the input of 52 participants recruited into five two-hour-long sessions, we categorized the behaviors of supervisors facing anti-Black racial injuries involving learners under their oversight. We organized supervisor behaviors into five interlocking domains, each with a range of possible themes: 1) <i>Joining</i>: from conciliatory to confrontational in communicating with the aggressor; 2) <i>Explicitness</i>: from avoiding to naming racism; 3) <i>Ownership</i>: from individual to shared responsibility of the event and the response to it; 4) <i>Involving:</i> from excusing to including the aggrieved party when confronting the aggressor; and 5) <i>Stance</i>: from protective to paternalistic in supporting the learner's autonomy. Conclusions Our qualitative findings can provide a framework for facilitated discussion toward reflective practice among healthcare providers who may have experienced, witnessed, or intervened in anti-Black racist interactions. They can also help medical educators to inform faculty development to fight anti-Black racism in clinical practice. The video materials we developed are available for viewing and download and can be used or adapted as springboards for reflective discussion or faculty development activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"13 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Black racism in clinical supervision: asynchronous simulated encounters facilitate reflective practice.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda J Calhoun, Andrés Martin, Ayodola Adigun, Shirley D Alleyne, Kammarauche Aneni, Tara Thompson-Felix, Andrea Asnes, Marco A de Carvalho-Filho, Laelia Benoit, Inginia Genao\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/mep.19487.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Racist interactions in clinical practice remain a pervasive reality for Black healthcare providers. We sought to develop a framework to inform supervisors' actions when confronting racism in clinical practice and protecting trainees under their oversight. Methods We conducted a qualitative study in which experienced supervisors responded to seven short, videotaped interactions between: 1) Black trainees and a simulated patient (SP) in a racist role; 2) the trainees and their respective supervisors; and 3) the trainees and their supervisors together with the SP. The clinical exchanges exemplified different types of racist <i>(entrenching)</i> or antiracist <i>(uprooting)</i> behaviors by the supervisors. After viewing each clip, participants wrote their reflections confidentially; they later joined a structured debriefing together. We used thematic analysis to identify supervisors' behavioral patterns when confronting racist interactions. Results Based on the input of 52 participants recruited into five two-hour-long sessions, we categorized the behaviors of supervisors facing anti-Black racial injuries involving learners under their oversight. We organized supervisor behaviors into five interlocking domains, each with a range of possible themes: 1) <i>Joining</i>: from conciliatory to confrontational in communicating with the aggressor; 2) <i>Explicitness</i>: from avoiding to naming racism; 3) <i>Ownership</i>: from individual to shared responsibility of the event and the response to it; 4) <i>Involving:</i> from excusing to including the aggrieved party when confronting the aggressor; and 5) <i>Stance</i>: from protective to paternalistic in supporting the learner's autonomy. Conclusions Our qualitative findings can provide a framework for facilitated discussion toward reflective practice among healthcare providers who may have experienced, witnessed, or intervened in anti-Black racist interactions. They can also help medical educators to inform faculty development to fight anti-Black racism in clinical practice. The video materials we developed are available for viewing and download and can be used or adapted as springboards for reflective discussion or faculty development activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10140654/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19487.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19487.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 临床实践中的种族主义互动仍然是黑人医疗服务提供者普遍面临的现实问题。我们试图建立一个框架,为督导人员在面对临床实践中的种族主义和保护其监管下的受训人员时提供行动依据。方法 我们进行了一项定性研究,由经验丰富的督导人员对以下七段短小的互动录像作出回应:1)黑人受训人员和一名扮演种族主义角色的模拟病人(SP);2)受训人员和他们各自的督导人员;3)受训人员和他们的督导人员以及模拟病人。这些临床交流片段展示了督导人员不同类型的种族主义(固化)或反种族主义(拔除)行为。在观看完每个片段后,学员们都秘密地写下了自己的反思;随后,他们一起参加了结构化汇报。我们采用主题分析法来确定主管在面对种族主义互动时的行为模式。结果 根据 52 名参与者在五次长达两小时的会议中提出的意见,我们对主管人员在面对涉及其监管下的学员的反黑人种族伤害时的行为进行了分类。我们将督导员的行为分为五个相互关联的领域,每个领域都有一系列可能的主题:1)加入:在与施暴者沟通时,从和解到对抗;2)明确:从回避到点名种族主义;3)所有权:从个人到共同承担事件及应对措施的责任;4)参与:在与施暴者对抗时,从开脱到让施暴者参与;5)立场:在支持学员自主方面,从保护到家长式。结论 我们的定性研究结果可以为那些可能经历过、目睹过或干预过反黑人种族主义互动的医疗服务提供者提供一个促进讨论、实现反思性实践的框架。这些研究结果还有助于医学教育工作者为师资队伍建设提供信息,以打击临床实践中的反黑人种族主义。我们开发的视频材料可供观看和下载,可用作或改编为反思讨论或教师发展活动的跳板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anti-Black racism in clinical supervision: asynchronous simulated encounters facilitate reflective practice.

Background Racist interactions in clinical practice remain a pervasive reality for Black healthcare providers. We sought to develop a framework to inform supervisors' actions when confronting racism in clinical practice and protecting trainees under their oversight. Methods We conducted a qualitative study in which experienced supervisors responded to seven short, videotaped interactions between: 1) Black trainees and a simulated patient (SP) in a racist role; 2) the trainees and their respective supervisors; and 3) the trainees and their supervisors together with the SP. The clinical exchanges exemplified different types of racist (entrenching) or antiracist (uprooting) behaviors by the supervisors. After viewing each clip, participants wrote their reflections confidentially; they later joined a structured debriefing together. We used thematic analysis to identify supervisors' behavioral patterns when confronting racist interactions. Results Based on the input of 52 participants recruited into five two-hour-long sessions, we categorized the behaviors of supervisors facing anti-Black racial injuries involving learners under their oversight. We organized supervisor behaviors into five interlocking domains, each with a range of possible themes: 1) Joining: from conciliatory to confrontational in communicating with the aggressor; 2) Explicitness: from avoiding to naming racism; 3) Ownership: from individual to shared responsibility of the event and the response to it; 4) Involving: from excusing to including the aggrieved party when confronting the aggressor; and 5) Stance: from protective to paternalistic in supporting the learner's autonomy. Conclusions Our qualitative findings can provide a framework for facilitated discussion toward reflective practice among healthcare providers who may have experienced, witnessed, or intervened in anti-Black racist interactions. They can also help medical educators to inform faculty development to fight anti-Black racism in clinical practice. The video materials we developed are available for viewing and download and can be used or adapted as springboards for reflective discussion or faculty development activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Medical students' knowledge on palliative care - a survey of teaching in Finland. Developing a clinician-friendly rubric for assessing history-taking skills in medical undergraduates speaking English as a foreign language. A retrospective feedback analysis of objective structured clinical examination performance of undergraduate medical students. Guidelines for Integrating actionable A-SMART Learning Outcomes into the Backward Design Process. Practical tips for teaching medicine in the metaverse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1