基于干细胞的裂隙缺陷组织工程:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-18 DOI:10.1177/10556656231175278
Diandra S Natsir Kalla, Salem A Alkaabi, Faqi N Hendra, Nisrina E Nasrun, Muhammad Ruslin, Tymour Forouzanfar, Marco N Helder
{"title":"基于干细胞的裂隙缺陷组织工程:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Diandra S Natsir Kalla, Salem A Alkaabi, Faqi N Hendra, Nisrina E Nasrun, Muhammad Ruslin, Tymour Forouzanfar, Marco N Helder","doi":"10.1177/10556656231175278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of stem cell-based tissue engineering for the treatment of alveolar cleft (AC) and cleft palate (CP) defects in animal models.</p><p><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><p>Preclinical studies on alveolar cleft repair in maxillofacial practice.</p><p><p>Electronic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Pre-clinical studies, where stem cell-based tissue engineering was used in the reconstruction of AC and CP in animal models were included. Quality of the selected articles was evaluated using SYRCLE (SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation).</p><p><p>Review of alveolar cleft bone augmentation interventions in preclinical models.</p><p><p>Outcome parameters registered were new bone formation (NBF) and/or bone mineral density (BMD).</p><p><p>Thirteen large and twelve small animal studies on AC (21) and CP (4) reconstructions were included. Studies had an unclear-to-high risk of bias. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were the most widely used cell source. Meta-analyses for AC indicated non-significant benefits in favor of: (1) scaffold + cells over scaffold-only (NBF <i>P</i> = .13); and (2) scaffold + cells over empty control (NBF <i>P</i> = .66; BMD <i>P</i> = .31). Interestingly, dog studies using regenerative grafts showed similar to superior bone formation compared to autografts. Meta analysis for the CP group was not possible.</p><p><p>AC and CP reconstructions are enhanced by addition of osteogenic cells to biomaterials. Directions and estimates of treatment effect are useful to predict therapeutic efficacy and guide future clinical trials of bone tissue engineering.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stem Cell-Based Tissue Engineering for Cleft Defects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Diandra S Natsir Kalla, Salem A Alkaabi, Faqi N Hendra, Nisrina E Nasrun, Muhammad Ruslin, Tymour Forouzanfar, Marco N Helder\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656231175278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of stem cell-based tissue engineering for the treatment of alveolar cleft (AC) and cleft palate (CP) defects in animal models.</p><p><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><p>Preclinical studies on alveolar cleft repair in maxillofacial practice.</p><p><p>Electronic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Pre-clinical studies, where stem cell-based tissue engineering was used in the reconstruction of AC and CP in animal models were included. Quality of the selected articles was evaluated using SYRCLE (SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation).</p><p><p>Review of alveolar cleft bone augmentation interventions in preclinical models.</p><p><p>Outcome parameters registered were new bone formation (NBF) and/or bone mineral density (BMD).</p><p><p>Thirteen large and twelve small animal studies on AC (21) and CP (4) reconstructions were included. Studies had an unclear-to-high risk of bias. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were the most widely used cell source. Meta-analyses for AC indicated non-significant benefits in favor of: (1) scaffold + cells over scaffold-only (NBF <i>P</i> = .13); and (2) scaffold + cells over empty control (NBF <i>P</i> = .66; BMD <i>P</i> = .31). Interestingly, dog studies using regenerative grafts showed similar to superior bone formation compared to autografts. Meta analysis for the CP group was not possible.</p><p><p>AC and CP reconstructions are enhanced by addition of osteogenic cells to biomaterials. Directions and estimates of treatment effect are useful to predict therapeutic efficacy and guide future clinical trials of bone tissue engineering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231175278\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231175278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析基于干细胞的组织工程在动物模型中治疗齿槽裂(AC)和腭裂(CP)缺损的疗效。系统综述和荟萃分析.颌面部实践中齿槽裂修复的临床前研究.使用PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行电子检索。包括在动物模型中使用干细胞组织工程重建 AC 和 CP 的临床前研究。结果参数为新骨形成(NBF)和/或骨矿物质密度(BMD)。纳入了13项关于AC(21项)和CP(4项)重建的大型动物研究和12项小型动物研究。这些研究的偏倚风险从不确定性到高风险不等。骨髓间充质干细胞是最广泛使用的细胞来源。针对 AC 的 Meta 分析表明,以下几种方法的优势并不明显:(1)支架+细胞优于纯支架(NBF P = .13);(2)支架+细胞优于空对照(NBF P = .66;BMD P = .31)。有趣的是,与自体移植物相比,使用再生移植物的狗研究显示出相似或更优的骨形成。在生物材料中加入成骨细胞可增强 AC 和 CP 重建。治疗效果的方向和估计值有助于预测疗效和指导未来的骨组织工程临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stem Cell-Based Tissue Engineering for Cleft Defects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of stem cell-based tissue engineering for the treatment of alveolar cleft (AC) and cleft palate (CP) defects in animal models.

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Preclinical studies on alveolar cleft repair in maxillofacial practice.

Electronic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Pre-clinical studies, where stem cell-based tissue engineering was used in the reconstruction of AC and CP in animal models were included. Quality of the selected articles was evaluated using SYRCLE (SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation).

Review of alveolar cleft bone augmentation interventions in preclinical models.

Outcome parameters registered were new bone formation (NBF) and/or bone mineral density (BMD).

Thirteen large and twelve small animal studies on AC (21) and CP (4) reconstructions were included. Studies had an unclear-to-high risk of bias. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were the most widely used cell source. Meta-analyses for AC indicated non-significant benefits in favor of: (1) scaffold + cells over scaffold-only (NBF P = .13); and (2) scaffold + cells over empty control (NBF P = .66; BMD P = .31). Interestingly, dog studies using regenerative grafts showed similar to superior bone formation compared to autografts. Meta analysis for the CP group was not possible.

AC and CP reconstructions are enhanced by addition of osteogenic cells to biomaterials. Directions and estimates of treatment effect are useful to predict therapeutic efficacy and guide future clinical trials of bone tissue engineering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
36.40%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Postoperative Daycare as a Safe and Cost-Effective Option for Secondary Alveolar Bone Graft (SABG) Surgery: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study. Prediction of Early Postoperative Pain in Infants Undergoing Primary Cleft Palate Repair. Jaw Surgery Workshop: Patient Preparation for Orthognathic Surgery. Prognosis of Maxillary Central Incisors in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Lip/Palate. Single-cell Transcriptome Landscape of DNA Methylome Regulators Associated with Orofacial Clefts in the Mouse Dental Pulp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1