HIPEC用于妇科恶性肿瘤:最新更新(回顾)。

Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou, Aristarchos Almperis, Alexios Papanikolaou, Antonio Simone Laganà, George Mavromatidis, Frederic Guyon, Konstantinos Dinas, Stamatios Petousis
{"title":"HIPEC用于妇科恶性肿瘤:最新更新(回顾)。","authors":"Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou,&nbsp;Aristarchos Almperis,&nbsp;Alexios Papanikolaou,&nbsp;Antonio Simone Laganà,&nbsp;George Mavromatidis,&nbsp;Frederic Guyon,&nbsp;Konstantinos Dinas,&nbsp;Stamatios Petousis","doi":"10.3892/mi.2023.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advanced-stage gynaecological cancer represents a clinical entity with challenging surgical treatment in an effort to optimize prognosis. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been reported as a method potentially eligible to improve prognosis. However, no definitive conclusions have yet been made on which types of cancer and which context HIPEC may actually have a beneficial impact. The present review discusses the efficacy and safety of HIPEC as a treatment option for patients with primary/recurrent ovarian, endometrial and cervix cancer, as well as peritoneal sarcomatosis. A literature search was conducted using MeSH terms for each topic in the PubMed database and supplemented with a manual search to retrieve additional articles eligible for inclusion/fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The implementation of HIPEC appears to be beneficial in terms of survival in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as well as in patients with recurrent EOC. Statistical superiority is not justified by current studies regarding other gynaecological malignancies with peritoneal dissemination. Furthermore, as regards safety, HIPEC following CRS does not appear to significantly increase the mortality and morbidity rates compared to the use of CRS alone. The rationale for using HIPEC and CRS in the treatment of ovarian cancer, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, as well as for recurrences, is adequately evidenced, with acceptable safety and post-operative complication rate profiles. Its current place in the multimodal strategy for patients with peritoneal metastases remains uncertain, however. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to further examine the use of HIPEC and establish the optimal regimen and temperature settings. The role of optimal cytoreduction and no residual disease, as well as the proper patient selection remain basic parameters for maximizing survival parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":74161,"journal":{"name":"Medicine international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a2/07/mi-03-03-00085.PMC10189421.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HIPEC for gynaecological malignancies: A last update (Review).\",\"authors\":\"Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou,&nbsp;Aristarchos Almperis,&nbsp;Alexios Papanikolaou,&nbsp;Antonio Simone Laganà,&nbsp;George Mavromatidis,&nbsp;Frederic Guyon,&nbsp;Konstantinos Dinas,&nbsp;Stamatios Petousis\",\"doi\":\"10.3892/mi.2023.85\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advanced-stage gynaecological cancer represents a clinical entity with challenging surgical treatment in an effort to optimize prognosis. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been reported as a method potentially eligible to improve prognosis. However, no definitive conclusions have yet been made on which types of cancer and which context HIPEC may actually have a beneficial impact. The present review discusses the efficacy and safety of HIPEC as a treatment option for patients with primary/recurrent ovarian, endometrial and cervix cancer, as well as peritoneal sarcomatosis. A literature search was conducted using MeSH terms for each topic in the PubMed database and supplemented with a manual search to retrieve additional articles eligible for inclusion/fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The implementation of HIPEC appears to be beneficial in terms of survival in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as well as in patients with recurrent EOC. Statistical superiority is not justified by current studies regarding other gynaecological malignancies with peritoneal dissemination. Furthermore, as regards safety, HIPEC following CRS does not appear to significantly increase the mortality and morbidity rates compared to the use of CRS alone. The rationale for using HIPEC and CRS in the treatment of ovarian cancer, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, as well as for recurrences, is adequately evidenced, with acceptable safety and post-operative complication rate profiles. Its current place in the multimodal strategy for patients with peritoneal metastases remains uncertain, however. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to further examine the use of HIPEC and establish the optimal regimen and temperature settings. The role of optimal cytoreduction and no residual disease, as well as the proper patient selection remain basic parameters for maximizing survival parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine international\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a2/07/mi-03-03-00085.PMC10189421.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2023.85\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2023.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

晚期妇科癌症是一种临床实体,具有挑战性的手术治疗,努力优化预后。据报道,细胞减少手术(CRS)后的腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)是一种可能改善预后的方法。然而,对于哪种类型的癌症和哪种情况下HIPEC实际上可能有有益的影响,目前还没有明确的结论。本综述讨论了HIPEC作为原发性/复发性卵巢癌、子宫内膜癌和宫颈癌以及腹膜肉瘤患者的治疗选择的有效性和安全性。对PubMed数据库中的每个主题使用MeSH术语进行文献检索,并辅以人工检索以检索符合纳入/满足纳入标准的其他文章。HIPEC的实施似乎有利于新辅助化疗后上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者的生存,以及复发性EOC患者。目前关于腹膜传播的其他妇科恶性肿瘤的研究并不能证明统计学上的优势。此外,在安全性方面,与单独使用CRS相比,CRS后的HIPEC似乎没有显著增加死亡率和发病率。使用HIPEC和CRS治疗卵巢癌的基本原理,特别是在新辅助环境中,以及复发,有充分的证据,具有可接受的安全性和术后并发症发生率。然而,它目前在腹膜转移患者的多模式治疗策略中的地位仍不确定。随机临床试验是必要的,以进一步检查HIPEC的使用,并建立最佳的方案和温度设置。最佳细胞减少和无残留疾病的作用,以及适当的患者选择仍然是最大化生存参数的基本参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HIPEC for gynaecological malignancies: A last update (Review).

Advanced-stage gynaecological cancer represents a clinical entity with challenging surgical treatment in an effort to optimize prognosis. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has been reported as a method potentially eligible to improve prognosis. However, no definitive conclusions have yet been made on which types of cancer and which context HIPEC may actually have a beneficial impact. The present review discusses the efficacy and safety of HIPEC as a treatment option for patients with primary/recurrent ovarian, endometrial and cervix cancer, as well as peritoneal sarcomatosis. A literature search was conducted using MeSH terms for each topic in the PubMed database and supplemented with a manual search to retrieve additional articles eligible for inclusion/fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The implementation of HIPEC appears to be beneficial in terms of survival in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as well as in patients with recurrent EOC. Statistical superiority is not justified by current studies regarding other gynaecological malignancies with peritoneal dissemination. Furthermore, as regards safety, HIPEC following CRS does not appear to significantly increase the mortality and morbidity rates compared to the use of CRS alone. The rationale for using HIPEC and CRS in the treatment of ovarian cancer, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, as well as for recurrences, is adequately evidenced, with acceptable safety and post-operative complication rate profiles. Its current place in the multimodal strategy for patients with peritoneal metastases remains uncertain, however. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to further examine the use of HIPEC and establish the optimal regimen and temperature settings. The role of optimal cytoreduction and no residual disease, as well as the proper patient selection remain basic parameters for maximizing survival parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cardiovascular dysautonomia and cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (Review). Association of iron deficiency anaemia with the hospitalization and mortality rate of patients with COVID‑19. Multi‑label classification of biomedical data. Recent advances in the use of resveratrol against Staphylococcus aureus infections (Review). Exploring perinatal care and birth experiences in women with visual impairment: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1