原因不明复发性流产妇女着床前子宫内膜CD4+和CD8+的变化。

IF 2.5 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Przeglad Menopauzalny Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.5114/pm.2023.126438
Ahmed Abdelrahim, Eman Alkholy, Ahmed Gamal Badawie
{"title":"原因不明复发性流产妇女着床前子宫内膜CD4+和CD8+的变化。","authors":"Ahmed Abdelrahim,&nbsp;Eman Alkholy,&nbsp;Ahmed Gamal Badawie","doi":"10.5114/pm.2023.126438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the secretory-phase endometrial leucocytes in women with 2 or more unexplained abortions and in healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed in 3 tertiary centres: Ain Shams University, Al-Azhar, and October 6 University Maternity Hospitals. The study included 50 women who consented to participate in this study. Women were divided in 2 groups; the first group consisted of 25 non-pregnant women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss, while the second group (n = 25) included non-pregnant women as a control group who had no history of recurrent pregnancy loss. Endometrial biopsies were taken from all participants around the expected time of implantation (one week after induction of ovulation by human chorionic gonadotrophins) to elucidate the T lymphocyte population, CD4+ (helper-T) and CD8+ (suppressor-T) markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with 2 or more unexplained abortions had significantly less endometrial CD8+ (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and consequently their endometrial CD4/CD8 ratio was higher in relation to the controls. There was no significant difference in endometrial CD4+ in relation to controls (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the results we can conclude that CD8 is more valuable than CD4 in women with recurrent spontaneous miscarriage. CD8 is better positive than negative in such patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":55643,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Menopauzalny","volume":"22 1","pages":"37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/9e/MR-22-50503.PMC10189672.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CD4+ and CD8+ preimplantation endometrial population in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Abdelrahim,&nbsp;Eman Alkholy,&nbsp;Ahmed Gamal Badawie\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pm.2023.126438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study is to assess the secretory-phase endometrial leucocytes in women with 2 or more unexplained abortions and in healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was performed in 3 tertiary centres: Ain Shams University, Al-Azhar, and October 6 University Maternity Hospitals. The study included 50 women who consented to participate in this study. Women were divided in 2 groups; the first group consisted of 25 non-pregnant women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss, while the second group (n = 25) included non-pregnant women as a control group who had no history of recurrent pregnancy loss. Endometrial biopsies were taken from all participants around the expected time of implantation (one week after induction of ovulation by human chorionic gonadotrophins) to elucidate the T lymphocyte population, CD4+ (helper-T) and CD8+ (suppressor-T) markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with 2 or more unexplained abortions had significantly less endometrial CD8+ (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and consequently their endometrial CD4/CD8 ratio was higher in relation to the controls. There was no significant difference in endometrial CD4+ in relation to controls (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the results we can conclude that CD8 is more valuable than CD4 in women with recurrent spontaneous miscarriage. CD8 is better positive than negative in such patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Menopauzalny\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"37-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/9e/MR-22-50503.PMC10189672.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Menopauzalny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2023.126438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Menopauzalny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2023.126438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究的目的是评估2次或2次以上不明原因流产的妇女和健康对照者的分泌期子宫内膜白细胞。材料和方法:本横断面研究在3个三级中心进行:艾因沙姆斯大学、爱资哈尔和10月6日大学妇产医院。这项研究包括50名同意参加这项研究的女性。将女性分为两组;第一组包括25名原因不明的复发性妊娠丢失的非妊娠妇女,第二组(n = 25)包括无复发性妊娠丢失史的非妊娠妇女作为对照组。所有参与者在预期着床时间(人绒毛膜促性腺激素诱导排卵后一周)进行子宫内膜活检,以阐明T淋巴细胞群、CD4+(辅助T)和CD8+(抑制T)标志物。结果:2次及2次以上原因流产妇女子宫内膜CD8+水平明显低于对照组(p < 0.05), CD4/CD8比值明显高于对照组。各组子宫内膜CD4+水平与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:在复发性自然流产妇女中,CD8比CD4更有价值。在这类患者中,CD8阳性优于阴性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CD4+ and CD8+ preimplantation endometrial population in women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.

Introduction: The aim of this study is to assess the secretory-phase endometrial leucocytes in women with 2 or more unexplained abortions and in healthy controls.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional study was performed in 3 tertiary centres: Ain Shams University, Al-Azhar, and October 6 University Maternity Hospitals. The study included 50 women who consented to participate in this study. Women were divided in 2 groups; the first group consisted of 25 non-pregnant women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss, while the second group (n = 25) included non-pregnant women as a control group who had no history of recurrent pregnancy loss. Endometrial biopsies were taken from all participants around the expected time of implantation (one week after induction of ovulation by human chorionic gonadotrophins) to elucidate the T lymphocyte population, CD4+ (helper-T) and CD8+ (suppressor-T) markers.

Results: Women with 2 or more unexplained abortions had significantly less endometrial CD8+ (p < 0.05), and consequently their endometrial CD4/CD8 ratio was higher in relation to the controls. There was no significant difference in endometrial CD4+ in relation to controls (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: From the results we can conclude that CD8 is more valuable than CD4 in women with recurrent spontaneous miscarriage. CD8 is better positive than negative in such patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Przeglad Menopauzalny
Przeglad Menopauzalny OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Menopausal Review is a scientific bimonthly aimed at gynecologists and endocrinologists.
期刊最新文献
Association of age at menopause with type 2 diabetes mellitus in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Genetic variants of the XRCC3 DNA repair gene: risk implications in breast cancer among Iraqi patients. Handgrip and its relation to age, fragility fractures, and BMD between sexes in a population aged 50+ years. Müllerianosis of the urinary bladder in pre- and postmenopausal women: a literature review. New MUSA classification of adenomyosis: correlation of symptoms and clinical severity with direct and indirect features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1