通过有效的指导实践实现神经科学多样化的发展方法:跨身份指导的观点和关键的行动呼吁。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnint.2023.1052418
Tanisha G Hill-Jarrett, Rowena Ng, Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez, Jemima Akinsanya, Ismary Blanco, Johnathan M Borland, James S Brown, Tameka Clemons, Adriana K Cushnie, Jacqueline Garcia, Brianna George, Cera W Hassinan, Timothy J Hines, Dan Landayan, Taylor A McCorkle, Katherine R Meckel, Mariajose Metcalfe, Samantha A Montoya, Deborah K Rose, Desmond R Warren
{"title":"通过有效的指导实践实现神经科学多样化的发展方法:跨身份指导的观点和关键的行动呼吁。","authors":"Tanisha G Hill-Jarrett,&nbsp;Rowena Ng,&nbsp;Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez,&nbsp;Jemima Akinsanya,&nbsp;Ismary Blanco,&nbsp;Johnathan M Borland,&nbsp;James S Brown,&nbsp;Tameka Clemons,&nbsp;Adriana K Cushnie,&nbsp;Jacqueline Garcia,&nbsp;Brianna George,&nbsp;Cera W Hassinan,&nbsp;Timothy J Hines,&nbsp;Dan Landayan,&nbsp;Taylor A McCorkle,&nbsp;Katherine R Meckel,&nbsp;Mariajose Metcalfe,&nbsp;Samantha A Montoya,&nbsp;Deborah K Rose,&nbsp;Desmond R Warren","doi":"10.3389/fnint.2023.1052418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many early-career neuroscientists with diverse identities may not have mentors who are more advanced in the neuroscience pipeline and have a congruent identity due to historic biases, laws, and policies impacting access to education. Cross-identity mentoring relationships pose challenges and power imbalances that impact the retention of diverse early career neuroscientists, but also hold the potential for a mutually enriching and collaborative relationship that fosters the mentee's success. Additionally, the barriers faced by diverse mentees and their mentorship needs may evolve with career progression and require developmental considerations. This article provides perspectives on factors that impact cross-identity mentorship from individuals participating in Diversifying the Community of Neuroscience (CNS)-a longitudinal, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R25 neuroscience mentorship program developed to increase diversity in the neurosciences. Participants in Diversifying CNS were comprised of 14 graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and early career faculty who completed an online qualitative survey on cross-identity mentorship practices that impact their experience in neuroscience fields. Qualitative survey data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis and resulted in four themes across career levels: (1) approach to mentorship and interpersonal dynamics, (2) allyship and management of power imbalance, (3) academic sponsorship, and (4) institutional barriers impacting navigation of academia. These themes, along with identified mentorship needs by developmental stage, provide insights mentors can use to better support the success of their mentees with diverse intersectional identities. As highlighted in our discussion, a mentor's awareness of systemic barriers along with active allyship are foundational for their role.</p>","PeriodicalId":56016,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1052418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9944572/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A developmental approach to diversifying neuroscience through effective mentorship practices: perspectives on cross-identity mentorship and a critical call to action.\",\"authors\":\"Tanisha G Hill-Jarrett,&nbsp;Rowena Ng,&nbsp;Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez,&nbsp;Jemima Akinsanya,&nbsp;Ismary Blanco,&nbsp;Johnathan M Borland,&nbsp;James S Brown,&nbsp;Tameka Clemons,&nbsp;Adriana K Cushnie,&nbsp;Jacqueline Garcia,&nbsp;Brianna George,&nbsp;Cera W Hassinan,&nbsp;Timothy J Hines,&nbsp;Dan Landayan,&nbsp;Taylor A McCorkle,&nbsp;Katherine R Meckel,&nbsp;Mariajose Metcalfe,&nbsp;Samantha A Montoya,&nbsp;Deborah K Rose,&nbsp;Desmond R Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnint.2023.1052418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many early-career neuroscientists with diverse identities may not have mentors who are more advanced in the neuroscience pipeline and have a congruent identity due to historic biases, laws, and policies impacting access to education. Cross-identity mentoring relationships pose challenges and power imbalances that impact the retention of diverse early career neuroscientists, but also hold the potential for a mutually enriching and collaborative relationship that fosters the mentee's success. Additionally, the barriers faced by diverse mentees and their mentorship needs may evolve with career progression and require developmental considerations. This article provides perspectives on factors that impact cross-identity mentorship from individuals participating in Diversifying the Community of Neuroscience (CNS)-a longitudinal, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R25 neuroscience mentorship program developed to increase diversity in the neurosciences. Participants in Diversifying CNS were comprised of 14 graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and early career faculty who completed an online qualitative survey on cross-identity mentorship practices that impact their experience in neuroscience fields. Qualitative survey data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis and resulted in four themes across career levels: (1) approach to mentorship and interpersonal dynamics, (2) allyship and management of power imbalance, (3) academic sponsorship, and (4) institutional barriers impacting navigation of academia. These themes, along with identified mentorship needs by developmental stage, provide insights mentors can use to better support the success of their mentees with diverse intersectional identities. As highlighted in our discussion, a mentor's awareness of systemic barriers along with active allyship are foundational for their role.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1052418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9944572/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2023.1052418\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2023.1052418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于影响教育机会的历史偏见、法律和政策,许多具有不同身份的早期职业神经科学家可能没有在神经科学管道中更先进的导师,也没有一致的身份。跨身份的师徒关系带来了挑战和权力不平衡,影响了不同早期职业神经科学家的留任,但也有可能形成一种相互丰富和合作的关系,从而促进被指导者的成功。此外,不同的学员所面临的障碍和他们的导师需求可能会随着职业发展而变化,需要考虑发展。本文从参与神经科学多元化社区(CNS)的个人角度提供了影响跨身份指导的因素的观点-这是一个纵向的,国家神经疾病和中风研究所(NINDS) R25神经科学指导计划,旨在增加神经科学的多样性。多元化中枢神经系统的参与者由14名研究生、博士后和早期职业教师组成,他们完成了一项关于跨身份指导实践影响他们在神经科学领域经验的在线定性调查。采用归纳主题分析方法对定性调查数据进行了分析,得出了四个跨职业层次的主题:(1)师友关系与人际动态、(2)盟友关系与权力失衡管理、(3)学术赞助、(4)影响学术导航的制度障碍。这些主题,以及根据发展阶段确定的指导需求,提供了导师可以用来更好地支持具有不同交叉身份的学员的成功的见解。正如我们在讨论中强调的那样,导师对系统障碍的认识以及积极的盟友关系是他们角色的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A developmental approach to diversifying neuroscience through effective mentorship practices: perspectives on cross-identity mentorship and a critical call to action.

Many early-career neuroscientists with diverse identities may not have mentors who are more advanced in the neuroscience pipeline and have a congruent identity due to historic biases, laws, and policies impacting access to education. Cross-identity mentoring relationships pose challenges and power imbalances that impact the retention of diverse early career neuroscientists, but also hold the potential for a mutually enriching and collaborative relationship that fosters the mentee's success. Additionally, the barriers faced by diverse mentees and their mentorship needs may evolve with career progression and require developmental considerations. This article provides perspectives on factors that impact cross-identity mentorship from individuals participating in Diversifying the Community of Neuroscience (CNS)-a longitudinal, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R25 neuroscience mentorship program developed to increase diversity in the neurosciences. Participants in Diversifying CNS were comprised of 14 graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and early career faculty who completed an online qualitative survey on cross-identity mentorship practices that impact their experience in neuroscience fields. Qualitative survey data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis and resulted in four themes across career levels: (1) approach to mentorship and interpersonal dynamics, (2) allyship and management of power imbalance, (3) academic sponsorship, and (4) institutional barriers impacting navigation of academia. These themes, along with identified mentorship needs by developmental stage, provide insights mentors can use to better support the success of their mentees with diverse intersectional identities. As highlighted in our discussion, a mentor's awareness of systemic barriers along with active allyship are foundational for their role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience Neuroscience-Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
148
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that synthesizes multiple facets of brain structure and function, to better understand how multiple diverse functions are integrated to produce complex behaviors. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Our goal is to publish research related to furthering the understanding of the integrative mechanisms underlying brain functioning across one or more interacting levels of neural organization. In most real life experiences, sensory inputs from several modalities converge and interact in a manner that influences perception and actions generating purposeful and social behaviors. The journal is therefore focused on the primary questions of how multiple sensory, cognitive and emotional processes merge to produce coordinated complex behavior. It is questions such as this that cannot be answered at a single level – an ion channel, a neuron or a synapse – that we wish to focus on. In Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience we welcome in vitro or in vivo investigations across the molecular, cellular, and systems and behavioral level. Research in any species and at any stage of development and aging that are focused at understanding integration mechanisms underlying emergent properties of the brain and behavior are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Anne M. Donnellan (1943-2024): a tribute to an autism legend, mentor, and friend. Editorial: Emotions in neuroscience: fundamentals and new discoveries. Online eurythmy therapy for cancer-related fatigue: a prospective repeated-measures observational study exploring fatigue, stress, and mindfulness. Differences in brain connectivity between older adults practicing Tai Chi and Water Aerobics: a case–control study Intermittent hypoxic training – derived exosomes in stroke rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1