药剂师纪律处分:药剂师会因为什么惹上麻烦?

Q2 Medicine Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.12927/hcpol.2023.27034
Ai-Leng Foong-Reichert, Kelly A Grindrod, David J Edwards, Zubin Austin, Sherilyn K D Houle
{"title":"药剂师纪律处分:药剂师会因为什么惹上麻烦?","authors":"Ai-Leng Foong-Reichert, Kelly A Grindrod, David J Edwards, Zubin Austin, Sherilyn K D Houle","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to determine the reasons for disciplinary action and resultant consequences for Canadian pharmacists and any associations with demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Regulatory body disciplinary action cases from 10 Canadian provinces were coded. Demographic information was coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 665 pharmacist cases from nine provinces between January 2010 and December 2020. The rate of disciplinary action was low (1.37 cases/1,000 practitioners/year). Professional misconduct was the most common category of violation. Male pharmacists were overrepresented in disciplinary action cases. Most cases involved community pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first, to our knowledge, in Canada to analyze the demographic factors of pharmacists subjected to disciplinary action. It updates a previous review of pharmacist disciplinary action (Foong et al. 2018).</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 3","pages":"60-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacist Disciplinary Action: What Do Pharmacists Get in Trouble for?\",\"authors\":\"Ai-Leng Foong-Reichert, Kelly A Grindrod, David J Edwards, Zubin Austin, Sherilyn K D Houle\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpol.2023.27034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to determine the reasons for disciplinary action and resultant consequences for Canadian pharmacists and any associations with demographic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Regulatory body disciplinary action cases from 10 Canadian provinces were coded. Demographic information was coded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 665 pharmacist cases from nine provinces between January 2010 and December 2020. The rate of disciplinary action was low (1.37 cases/1,000 practitioners/year). Professional misconduct was the most common category of violation. Male pharmacists were overrepresented in disciplinary action cases. Most cases involved community pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study is the first, to our knowledge, in Canada to analyze the demographic factors of pharmacists subjected to disciplinary action. It updates a previous review of pharmacist disciplinary action (Foong et al. 2018).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"60-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10019516/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2023.27034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在确定加拿大药剂师受到纪律处分的原因及其后果,以及与人口统计因素之间的关联:方法:对加拿大 10 个省的监管机构纪律处分案例进行编码。结果结果:2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,9 个省共发生了 665 起药剂师案件。纪律处分率较低(1.37 例/1,000 名从业人员/年)。职业不端行为是最常见的违规类别。在纪律处分案例中,男性药剂师所占比例较高。大多数案件涉及社区药剂师:据我们所知,这是加拿大第一项分析受到纪律处分的药剂师人口统计因素的研究。它更新了之前对药剂师纪律处分的回顾(Foong 等人,2018 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacist Disciplinary Action: What Do Pharmacists Get in Trouble for?

Objective: This study aims to determine the reasons for disciplinary action and resultant consequences for Canadian pharmacists and any associations with demographic factors.

Methods: Regulatory body disciplinary action cases from 10 Canadian provinces were coded. Demographic information was coded.

Results: There were 665 pharmacist cases from nine provinces between January 2010 and December 2020. The rate of disciplinary action was low (1.37 cases/1,000 practitioners/year). Professional misconduct was the most common category of violation. Male pharmacists were overrepresented in disciplinary action cases. Most cases involved community pharmacists.

Conclusion: This study is the first, to our knowledge, in Canada to analyze the demographic factors of pharmacists subjected to disciplinary action. It updates a previous review of pharmacist disciplinary action (Foong et al. 2018).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Barriers and Solutions to Healthcare Access for Immigrants in Canada. Do Politics and Healthcare Intersect in 2026? Authentically and Effectively Addressing Migrant Health Needs. Electronic Access to and Exchange of Patient Information Among Physicians Practising in Canada. Tears, Suffering and System Failure: What My Father's Pain Revealed About the Canadian Healthcare System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1