{"title":"半月板挤压是决定关节镜治疗部分内侧半月板后根撕裂的一个易感因素。","authors":"Takayuki Furumatsu, Keisuke Kintaka, Naohiro Higashihara, Masanori Tamura, Koki Kawada, Haowei Xue, Toshifumi Ozaki","doi":"10.1186/s43019-023-00182-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with partial medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) sometimes require arthroscopic pullout repair because of their intolerable/repeated knee pains and continuous disturbance in gait during activities of daily living. However, the predisposing factors for future knee surgery in patients with partial MMPRTs remain unclear. We compared the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between patients who underwent pullout repair and nonoperative management following partial MMPRTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five patients who required arthroscopic repair for partial MMPRTs and 23 patients who were managed nonoperatively were evaluated during a mean follow-up period of 27.1 months. Sex, age, height, body weight, body mass index, duration from onset to initial MRI, MRI findings, and medial meniscus (MM) extrusion were compared between the two groups. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between MM extrusion and duration from onset to MRI examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the pullout repair and nonoperative management groups in terms of patient demographics and the positive ratio of MRI-based root tear signs. However, absolute MM extrusion in the pullout repair group (3.49 ± 0.82 mm) was larger than that in the nonoperative management group (2.48 ± 0.60 mm, P < 0.001). Extrusion of the MM (> 3 mm) was detected more frequently in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative management group (P < 0.001). The odds ratio in the pullout repair and MM extrusion > 3 mm cases was 9.662. Linear regression analysis revealed a fair correlation between the duration from onset to MRI and MM extrusion only in the pullout repair group (0.462 mm/month increase in MM extrusion).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that more severe MM extrusions were observed in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative management group. Major extrusion (> 3 mm) was also observed more in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative group. Assessing MM extrusion and its severity can help determine a valid treatment for patients with partial MMPRTs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, Retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":17886,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012578/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meniscus extrusion is a predisposing factor for determining arthroscopic treatments in partial medial meniscus posterior root tears.\",\"authors\":\"Takayuki Furumatsu, Keisuke Kintaka, Naohiro Higashihara, Masanori Tamura, Koki Kawada, Haowei Xue, Toshifumi Ozaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43019-023-00182-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with partial medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) sometimes require arthroscopic pullout repair because of their intolerable/repeated knee pains and continuous disturbance in gait during activities of daily living. However, the predisposing factors for future knee surgery in patients with partial MMPRTs remain unclear. We compared the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between patients who underwent pullout repair and nonoperative management following partial MMPRTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five patients who required arthroscopic repair for partial MMPRTs and 23 patients who were managed nonoperatively were evaluated during a mean follow-up period of 27.1 months. Sex, age, height, body weight, body mass index, duration from onset to initial MRI, MRI findings, and medial meniscus (MM) extrusion were compared between the two groups. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between MM extrusion and duration from onset to MRI examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed between the pullout repair and nonoperative management groups in terms of patient demographics and the positive ratio of MRI-based root tear signs. However, absolute MM extrusion in the pullout repair group (3.49 ± 0.82 mm) was larger than that in the nonoperative management group (2.48 ± 0.60 mm, P < 0.001). Extrusion of the MM (> 3 mm) was detected more frequently in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative management group (P < 0.001). The odds ratio in the pullout repair and MM extrusion > 3 mm cases was 9.662. Linear regression analysis revealed a fair correlation between the duration from onset to MRI and MM extrusion only in the pullout repair group (0.462 mm/month increase in MM extrusion).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that more severe MM extrusions were observed in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative management group. Major extrusion (> 3 mm) was also observed more in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative group. Assessing MM extrusion and its severity can help determine a valid treatment for patients with partial MMPRTs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, Retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee Surgery & Related Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012578/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee Surgery & Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-023-00182-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-023-00182-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:部分内侧半月板后根撕裂(MMPRTs)患者有时需要关节镜下拔出修复,因为他们无法忍受/反复的膝关节疼痛和在日常生活活动中持续的步态障碍。然而,部分mmprt患者未来进行膝关节手术的易感因素仍不清楚。我们比较了部分MMPRTs后接受拔牙修复和非手术治疗的患者的磁共振成像(MRI)结果。方法:在平均27.1个月的随访期间,对25例需要关节镜修复部分mmprt的患者和23例非手术治疗的患者进行评估。比较两组患者的性别、年龄、身高、体重、体重指数、从发病到初次MRI持续时间、MRI表现和内侧半月板(MM)挤压情况。采用线性回归分析评估MM挤压与发病至MRI检查时间的相关性。结果:拔牙修复组和非手术处理组在患者人口统计学和mri根撕裂征象阳性率方面无显著差异。但拔牙修复组的绝对MM挤压(3.49±0.82 MM)大于非手术处理组(2.48±0.60 MM, p3mm),拔牙修复组的绝对MM挤压率高于非手术处理组(p3mm为9.662)。线性回归分析显示,仅在拔牙修复组中,从发病到MRI的持续时间与MM挤压之间存在良好的相关性(MM挤压增加0.462 MM /月)。结论:本研究表明,与非手术治疗组相比,拔牙修复组观察到更严重的MM挤压。与非手术组相比,拔牙修复组出现了更多的严重挤压(> 3mm)。评估MM挤压及其严重程度可以帮助确定部分mmprt患者的有效治疗方法。证据等级:IV,回顾性比较研究。
Meniscus extrusion is a predisposing factor for determining arthroscopic treatments in partial medial meniscus posterior root tears.
Background: Patients with partial medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) sometimes require arthroscopic pullout repair because of their intolerable/repeated knee pains and continuous disturbance in gait during activities of daily living. However, the predisposing factors for future knee surgery in patients with partial MMPRTs remain unclear. We compared the findings of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between patients who underwent pullout repair and nonoperative management following partial MMPRTs.
Methods: Twenty-five patients who required arthroscopic repair for partial MMPRTs and 23 patients who were managed nonoperatively were evaluated during a mean follow-up period of 27.1 months. Sex, age, height, body weight, body mass index, duration from onset to initial MRI, MRI findings, and medial meniscus (MM) extrusion were compared between the two groups. Linear regression analysis was used to assess the correlation between MM extrusion and duration from onset to MRI examination.
Results: No significant differences were observed between the pullout repair and nonoperative management groups in terms of patient demographics and the positive ratio of MRI-based root tear signs. However, absolute MM extrusion in the pullout repair group (3.49 ± 0.82 mm) was larger than that in the nonoperative management group (2.48 ± 0.60 mm, P < 0.001). Extrusion of the MM (> 3 mm) was detected more frequently in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative management group (P < 0.001). The odds ratio in the pullout repair and MM extrusion > 3 mm cases was 9.662. Linear regression analysis revealed a fair correlation between the duration from onset to MRI and MM extrusion only in the pullout repair group (0.462 mm/month increase in MM extrusion).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that more severe MM extrusions were observed in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative management group. Major extrusion (> 3 mm) was also observed more in the pullout repair group than in the nonoperative group. Assessing MM extrusion and its severity can help determine a valid treatment for patients with partial MMPRTs.
Level of evidence: IV, Retrospective comparative study.