15O-H2O正电子发射断层扫描心肌灌注成像预测有症状的冠状动脉搭桥术患者的临床血运重建手术。

Mazen Vester, Simon Madsen, Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff, Lars Poulsen Tolbod, Bent Roni Ranghøj Nielsen, Steen Dalby Kristensen, Evald Høj Christiansen, Per Hostrup Nielsen, Jens Sörensen, Lars Christian Gormsen
{"title":"15O-H2O正电子发射断层扫描心肌灌注成像预测有症状的冠状动脉搭桥术患者的临床血运重建手术。","authors":"Mazen Vester,&nbsp;Simon Madsen,&nbsp;Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff,&nbsp;Lars Poulsen Tolbod,&nbsp;Bent Roni Ranghøj Nielsen,&nbsp;Steen Dalby Kristensen,&nbsp;Evald Høj Christiansen,&nbsp;Per Hostrup Nielsen,&nbsp;Jens Sörensen,&nbsp;Lars Christian Gormsen","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oead044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We wanted to assess if <sup>15</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in a clinical setting can predict referral to coronary artery catheterization [coronary angiography (CAG)], execution of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and post-PCI angina relief for patients with angina and previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We analysed 172 symptomatic CABG patients referred for <sup>15</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O positron emission tomography (PET) MPI at Aarhus University Hospital Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre, of which five did not complete the scan. In total, 145 (87%) enrolled patients had an abnormal MPI. Of these, 86/145 (59%) underwent CAG within 3 months; however, no PET parameters predicted referral to CAG. During the CAG, 25/86 (29%) patients were revascularized by PCI. Relative flow reserve (RFR) (0.49 vs. 0.54 <i>P</i> = 0.03), vessel-specific myocardial blood flow (MBF) (1.53 vs. 1.88 mL/g/min, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and vessel-specific myocardial flow reserve (MFR) (1.73 vs. 2.13, <i>P</i> < 0.01) were significantly lower in patients revascularized by PCI. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the vessel-specific parameters yielded optimal cutoffs of 1.36 mL/g/min (MBF) and 1.28 (MFR) to predict PCI. Angina relief was experienced by 18/24 (75%) of the patients who underwent PCI. Myocardial blood flow was an excellent predictor of angina relief on both a global [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.85, <i>P</i> < 0.01] and vessel-specific (AUC = 0.90, <i>P</i> < 0.01) level with optimal cutoff levels of 1.99 mL/g/min and 1.85 mL/g/min, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For CABG patients, RFR, vessel-specific MBF, and vessel-specific MFR measured by <sup>15</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O PET MPI predict whether subsequent CAG will result in PCI. Additionally, global and vessel-specific MBF values predict post-PCI angina relief.</p>","PeriodicalId":11973,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4a/37/oead044.PMC10191278.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myocardial perfusion imaging by <sup>15</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O positron emission tomography predicts clinical revascularization procedures in symptomatic patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft.\",\"authors\":\"Mazen Vester,&nbsp;Simon Madsen,&nbsp;Mette Louise Gram Kjærulff,&nbsp;Lars Poulsen Tolbod,&nbsp;Bent Roni Ranghøj Nielsen,&nbsp;Steen Dalby Kristensen,&nbsp;Evald Høj Christiansen,&nbsp;Per Hostrup Nielsen,&nbsp;Jens Sörensen,&nbsp;Lars Christian Gormsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjopen/oead044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We wanted to assess if <sup>15</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in a clinical setting can predict referral to coronary artery catheterization [coronary angiography (CAG)], execution of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and post-PCI angina relief for patients with angina and previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We analysed 172 symptomatic CABG patients referred for <sup>15</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O positron emission tomography (PET) MPI at Aarhus University Hospital Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre, of which five did not complete the scan. In total, 145 (87%) enrolled patients had an abnormal MPI. Of these, 86/145 (59%) underwent CAG within 3 months; however, no PET parameters predicted referral to CAG. During the CAG, 25/86 (29%) patients were revascularized by PCI. Relative flow reserve (RFR) (0.49 vs. 0.54 <i>P</i> = 0.03), vessel-specific myocardial blood flow (MBF) (1.53 vs. 1.88 mL/g/min, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and vessel-specific myocardial flow reserve (MFR) (1.73 vs. 2.13, <i>P</i> < 0.01) were significantly lower in patients revascularized by PCI. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the vessel-specific parameters yielded optimal cutoffs of 1.36 mL/g/min (MBF) and 1.28 (MFR) to predict PCI. Angina relief was experienced by 18/24 (75%) of the patients who underwent PCI. Myocardial blood flow was an excellent predictor of angina relief on both a global [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.85, <i>P</i> < 0.01] and vessel-specific (AUC = 0.90, <i>P</i> < 0.01) level with optimal cutoff levels of 1.99 mL/g/min and 1.85 mL/g/min, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For CABG patients, RFR, vessel-specific MBF, and vessel-specific MFR measured by <sup>15</sup>O-H<sub>2</sub>O PET MPI predict whether subsequent CAG will result in PCI. Additionally, global and vessel-specific MBF values predict post-PCI angina relief.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4a/37/oead044.PMC10191278.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们想评估15O-H2O心肌灌注成像(MPI)在临床环境中是否可以预测转诊冠状动脉插管[冠状动脉造影(CAG)],经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的实施,以及PCI后心绞痛患者和既往冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的缓解。方法和结果:我们分析了172例在奥胡斯大学医院核医学和PET中心进行15O-H2O正电子发射断层扫描(PET) MPI的有症状的CABG患者,其中5例未完成扫描。共有145例(87%)入组患者MPI异常。其中,86/145(59%)在3个月内行CAG;然而,没有PET参数预测转诊到CAG。CAG期间,25/86(29%)患者行PCI血运重建。PCI血运重建术患者的相对血流储备(RFR) (0.49 vs. 0.54 P = 0.03)、血管特异性心肌血流量(MBF) (1.53 vs. 1.88 mL/g/min, P < 0.01)、血管特异性心肌血流储备(MFR) (1.73 vs. 2.13, P < 0.01)均显著降低。对血管特异性参数的受试者工作特征分析得出预测PCI的最佳临界值分别为1.36 mL/g/min (MBF)和1.28 mL/g/min (MFR)。接受PCI治疗的患者中有18/24(75%)心绞痛缓解。心肌血流量是心绞痛缓解的良好预测指标,总体曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.85, P < 0.01)和血管特异性(AUC = 0.90, P < 0.01)水平,最佳临界值分别为1.99 mL/g/min和1.85 mL/g/min。结论:对于CABG患者,15O-H2O PET MPI测量的RFR、血管特异性MBF和血管特异性MFR可预测后续CAG是否会导致PCI。此外,整体和血管特异性MBF值预测pci后心绞痛缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Myocardial perfusion imaging by 15O-H2O positron emission tomography predicts clinical revascularization procedures in symptomatic patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft.

Aims: We wanted to assess if 15O-H2O myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in a clinical setting can predict referral to coronary artery catheterization [coronary angiography (CAG)], execution of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and post-PCI angina relief for patients with angina and previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

Methods and results: We analysed 172 symptomatic CABG patients referred for 15O-H2O positron emission tomography (PET) MPI at Aarhus University Hospital Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre, of which five did not complete the scan. In total, 145 (87%) enrolled patients had an abnormal MPI. Of these, 86/145 (59%) underwent CAG within 3 months; however, no PET parameters predicted referral to CAG. During the CAG, 25/86 (29%) patients were revascularized by PCI. Relative flow reserve (RFR) (0.49 vs. 0.54 P = 0.03), vessel-specific myocardial blood flow (MBF) (1.53 vs. 1.88 mL/g/min, P < 0.01), and vessel-specific myocardial flow reserve (MFR) (1.73 vs. 2.13, P < 0.01) were significantly lower in patients revascularized by PCI. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the vessel-specific parameters yielded optimal cutoffs of 1.36 mL/g/min (MBF) and 1.28 (MFR) to predict PCI. Angina relief was experienced by 18/24 (75%) of the patients who underwent PCI. Myocardial blood flow was an excellent predictor of angina relief on both a global [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.85, P < 0.01] and vessel-specific (AUC = 0.90, P < 0.01) level with optimal cutoff levels of 1.99 mL/g/min and 1.85 mL/g/min, respectively.

Conclusion: For CABG patients, RFR, vessel-specific MBF, and vessel-specific MFR measured by 15O-H2O PET MPI predict whether subsequent CAG will result in PCI. Additionally, global and vessel-specific MBF values predict post-PCI angina relief.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes of intracardiac flow dynamics measured by HyperDoppler in patients with aortic stenosis Development of a Small Animal Model Replicating Core Characteristics of Takotsubo Syndrome in Humans Elastin turnover in Williams Beuren and 7q11.23 microduplication syndromes Myeloid-specific interleukin-6 response: from vascular effects to the potential for novel personalized medicines Myeloid cell derived Interleukin-6 induces vascular dysfunction and vascular and systemic inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1