肯尼亚一家国家转诊医院食管癌患者生存结果的决定因素

Amsalu Degu, Peter N. Karimi, Sylvia A. Opanga, David G. Nyamu
{"title":"肯尼亚一家国家转诊医院食管癌患者生存结果的决定因素","authors":"Amsalu Degu,&nbsp;Peter N. Karimi,&nbsp;Sylvia A. Opanga,&nbsp;David G. Nyamu","doi":"10.1002/cdt3.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The overall 5-year survival rate for esophageal cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries was reported to be low, despite the availability of advanced treatments. Thus, this study aimed to assess determinants of survival outcomes among esophageal cancer patients in Kenya.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective cohort study was employed among 299 adult esophageal cancer patients. The data were collected using a data abstraction tool consisting of patients’ clinical characteristics and survival outcome measuring parameters. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software (version 20.0, IBM. USA) was used to analyze the data. The Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the survival outcome and determinants of mortality, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mortality rate was 43.1%, and 11.1% of patients demonstrated distant metastases in the follow-up period. Despite treatment, 20.1% had progressed disease, and 13.0% did not respond to treatment. Radiotherapy (AHR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.4−7.8, <i>p</i> = 0.007), chemotherapy (AHR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.2−6.1, <i>p</i> = 0.020), and chemoradiation (AHR: 5.6, 95%CI: 1.6−10.2, <i>p</i> = 0.006) were the significant determinants of survival in advanced stage (III and and IV) patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There was a high mortality rate, disease progression, and nonresponse of esophageal cancer patients. Hence, it is essential to improve the survival of patients through early detection and timely initiation of the available treatment options.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":32096,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":"20-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/d6/CDT3-9-20.PMC10011667.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of survival outcomes among esophageal cancer patients at a national referral hospital in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Amsalu Degu,&nbsp;Peter N. Karimi,&nbsp;Sylvia A. Opanga,&nbsp;David G. Nyamu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cdt3.52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>The overall 5-year survival rate for esophageal cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries was reported to be low, despite the availability of advanced treatments. Thus, this study aimed to assess determinants of survival outcomes among esophageal cancer patients in Kenya.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective cohort study was employed among 299 adult esophageal cancer patients. The data were collected using a data abstraction tool consisting of patients’ clinical characteristics and survival outcome measuring parameters. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software (version 20.0, IBM. USA) was used to analyze the data. The Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the survival outcome and determinants of mortality, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The mortality rate was 43.1%, and 11.1% of patients demonstrated distant metastases in the follow-up period. Despite treatment, 20.1% had progressed disease, and 13.0% did not respond to treatment. Radiotherapy (AHR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.4−7.8, <i>p</i> = 0.007), chemotherapy (AHR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.2−6.1, <i>p</i> = 0.020), and chemoradiation (AHR: 5.6, 95%CI: 1.6−10.2, <i>p</i> = 0.006) were the significant determinants of survival in advanced stage (III and and IV) patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was a high mortality rate, disease progression, and nonresponse of esophageal cancer patients. Hence, it is essential to improve the survival of patients through early detection and timely initiation of the available treatment options.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"20-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ce/d6/CDT3-9-20.PMC10011667.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cdt3.52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cdt3.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,中低收入国家食管癌患者的总体5年生存率很低,尽管有先进的治疗方法。因此,本研究旨在评估肯尼亚食管癌患者生存结果的决定因素。方法对299例成年食管癌患者进行回顾性队列研究。使用数据抽象工具收集数据,包括患者的临床特征和生存结局测量参数。统计软件包的社会科学(SPSS)统计软件(版本20.0,IBM。采用美国)对数据进行分析。Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析分别用于确定生存结局和死亡决定因素。结果随访期间患者死亡率为43.1%,远处转移率为11.1%。尽管接受了治疗,20.1%的患者病情进展,13.0%的患者对治疗无反应。放疗(AHR: 3.3, 95%CI: 1.4 ~ 7.8, p = 0.007)、化疗(AHR: 3.9, 95%CI: 1.2 ~ 6.1, p = 0.020)和放化疗(AHR: 5.6, 95%CI: 1.6 ~ 10.2, p = 0.006)是晚期(III期和IV期)患者生存的重要决定因素。结论食管癌患者死亡率高、病情进展快、无应答。因此,通过早期发现和及时启动可用的治疗方案来提高患者的生存率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinants of survival outcomes among esophageal cancer patients at a national referral hospital in Kenya

Introduction

The overall 5-year survival rate for esophageal cancer patients in low- and middle-income countries was reported to be low, despite the availability of advanced treatments. Thus, this study aimed to assess determinants of survival outcomes among esophageal cancer patients in Kenya.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was employed among 299 adult esophageal cancer patients. The data were collected using a data abstraction tool consisting of patients’ clinical characteristics and survival outcome measuring parameters. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software (version 20.0, IBM. USA) was used to analyze the data. The Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the survival outcome and determinants of mortality, respectively.

Results

The mortality rate was 43.1%, and 11.1% of patients demonstrated distant metastases in the follow-up period. Despite treatment, 20.1% had progressed disease, and 13.0% did not respond to treatment. Radiotherapy (AHR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.4−7.8, p = 0.007), chemotherapy (AHR: 3.9, 95% CI: 1.2−6.1, p = 0.020), and chemoradiation (AHR: 5.6, 95%CI: 1.6−10.2, p = 0.006) were the significant determinants of survival in advanced stage (III and and IV) patients.

Conclusions

There was a high mortality rate, disease progression, and nonresponse of esophageal cancer patients. Hence, it is essential to improve the survival of patients through early detection and timely initiation of the available treatment options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote progress from basic research to clinical practice and to provide a forum for communication among basic, translational, and clinical research practitioners and physicians from all relevant disciplines. Chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, stroke, chronic respiratory diseases (such as asthma and COPD), chronic kidney diseases, and related translational research. Topics of interest for Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine include Research and commentary on models of chronic diseases with significant implications for disease diagnosis and treatment Investigative studies of human biology with an emphasis on disease Perspectives and reviews on research topics that discuss the implications of findings from the viewpoints of basic science and clinical practic.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Guide for Authors Association of cardiorenal biomarkers with mortality in metabolic syndrome patients: A prospective cohort study from NHANES Current status and perspectives in environmental oncology S-acylation of Ca2+ transport proteins in cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1