基于卷积神经网络迁移学习的高效净伪干电极EEG数据分类

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Clinical Neurophysiology Practice Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cnp.2023.04.002
M.N. van Stigt , E.A. Groenendijk , H.A. Marquering , J.M. Coutinho , W.V. Potters
{"title":"基于卷积神经网络迁移学习的高效净伪干电极EEG数据分类","authors":"M.N. van Stigt ,&nbsp;E.A. Groenendijk ,&nbsp;H.A. Marquering ,&nbsp;J.M. Coutinho ,&nbsp;W.V. Potters","doi":"10.1016/j.cnp.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are promising for artifact detection in electroencephalography (EEG) data, but require large amounts of data. Despite increasing use of dry electrodes for EEG data acquisition, dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. We aim to develop an algorithm for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> dry electrode EEG data classification using transfer learning.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dry electrode EEG data were acquired in 13 subjects while physiological and technical artifacts were induced. Data were per 2-second segment labeled as <em>clean</em> or <em>artifact</em> and split in an 80% train and 20% test set. With the train set, we fine-tuned a pre-trained CNN for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> wet electrode EEG data classification using 3-fold cross validation. The three fine-tuned CNNs were combined in one final <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification algorithm, in which the majority vote was used for classification. We calculated accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall of the pre-trained CNN and fine-tuned algorithm when applied to unseen test data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The algorithm was trained on 0.40 million and tested on 0.17 million overlapping EEG segments. The pre-trained CNN had a test accuracy of 65.6%. The fine-tuned <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification algorithm had an improved test accuracy of 90.7%, F1-score of 90.2%, precision of 89.1% and recall of 91.2%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite a relatively small dry electrode EEG dataset, transfer learning enabled development of a high performing CNN-based algorithm for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Development of CNNs for classification of dry electrode EEG data is challenging as dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. Here, we show that transfer learning can be used to overcome this problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45697,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 88-91"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196906/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High performance clean versus artifact dry electrode EEG data classification using Convolutional Neural Network transfer learning\",\"authors\":\"M.N. van Stigt ,&nbsp;E.A. Groenendijk ,&nbsp;H.A. Marquering ,&nbsp;J.M. Coutinho ,&nbsp;W.V. Potters\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cnp.2023.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are promising for artifact detection in electroencephalography (EEG) data, but require large amounts of data. Despite increasing use of dry electrodes for EEG data acquisition, dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. We aim to develop an algorithm for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> dry electrode EEG data classification using transfer learning.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dry electrode EEG data were acquired in 13 subjects while physiological and technical artifacts were induced. Data were per 2-second segment labeled as <em>clean</em> or <em>artifact</em> and split in an 80% train and 20% test set. With the train set, we fine-tuned a pre-trained CNN for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> wet electrode EEG data classification using 3-fold cross validation. The three fine-tuned CNNs were combined in one final <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification algorithm, in which the majority vote was used for classification. We calculated accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall of the pre-trained CNN and fine-tuned algorithm when applied to unseen test data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The algorithm was trained on 0.40 million and tested on 0.17 million overlapping EEG segments. The pre-trained CNN had a test accuracy of 65.6%. The fine-tuned <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification algorithm had an improved test accuracy of 90.7%, F1-score of 90.2%, precision of 89.1% and recall of 91.2%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite a relatively small dry electrode EEG dataset, transfer learning enabled development of a high performing CNN-based algorithm for <em>clean</em> versus <em>artifact</em> classification.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>Development of CNNs for classification of dry electrode EEG data is challenging as dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. Here, we show that transfer learning can be used to overcome this problem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 88-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196906/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X23000094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467981X23000094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

卷积神经网络(Convolutional Neural Networks,CNNs)在脑电图(EEG)数据中具有很好的伪影检测前景,但需要大量的数据。尽管越来越多地使用干电极进行EEG数据采集,但干电极EEG数据集是稀疏的。我们的目标是开发一种使用迁移学习的清洁与伪影干电极EEG数据分类算法。方法采集13例受试者的干电极脑电图数据,同时诱发生理和技术伪影。数据是每2秒标记为干净或伪影的片段,并在80%的序列和20%的测试集中进行分割。使用训练集,我们使用3倍交叉验证对预训练的CNN进行了微调,用于清洁电极与伪影湿电极EEG数据分类。三个微调的细胞神经网络被组合在一个最终的干净与伪影分类算法中,其中大多数投票用于分类。当应用于看不见的测试数据时,我们计算了预先训练的CNN和微调算法的准确性、F1分数、精确度和召回率。结果该算法在40万个脑电重叠段上进行了训练,并在17万个重叠脑电片段上进行了测试。预先训练的CNN的测试准确率为65.6%。微调的干净与伪影分类算法的测试准确度提高了90.7%,F1得分提高了90.2%,准确率提高了89.1%,召回率提高了91.2%。值得注意的是,由于干电极EEG数据集稀疏,开发用于干电极脑电图数据分类的细胞神经网络具有挑战性。在这里,我们展示了迁移学习可以用来克服这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High performance clean versus artifact dry electrode EEG data classification using Convolutional Neural Network transfer learning

Objective

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are promising for artifact detection in electroencephalography (EEG) data, but require large amounts of data. Despite increasing use of dry electrodes for EEG data acquisition, dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. We aim to develop an algorithm for clean versus artifact dry electrode EEG data classification using transfer learning.

Methods

Dry electrode EEG data were acquired in 13 subjects while physiological and technical artifacts were induced. Data were per 2-second segment labeled as clean or artifact and split in an 80% train and 20% test set. With the train set, we fine-tuned a pre-trained CNN for clean versus artifact wet electrode EEG data classification using 3-fold cross validation. The three fine-tuned CNNs were combined in one final clean versus artifact classification algorithm, in which the majority vote was used for classification. We calculated accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall of the pre-trained CNN and fine-tuned algorithm when applied to unseen test data.

Results

The algorithm was trained on 0.40 million and tested on 0.17 million overlapping EEG segments. The pre-trained CNN had a test accuracy of 65.6%. The fine-tuned clean versus artifact classification algorithm had an improved test accuracy of 90.7%, F1-score of 90.2%, precision of 89.1% and recall of 91.2%.

Conclusions

Despite a relatively small dry electrode EEG dataset, transfer learning enabled development of a high performing CNN-based algorithm for clean versus artifact classification.

Significance

Development of CNNs for classification of dry electrode EEG data is challenging as dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. Here, we show that transfer learning can be used to overcome this problem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurophysiology Practice (CNP) is a new Open Access journal that focuses on clinical practice issues in clinical neurophysiology including relevant new research, case reports or clinical series, normal values and didactic reviews. It is an official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and complements Clinical Neurophysiology which focuses on innovative research in the specialty. It has a role in supporting established clinical practice, and an educational role for trainees, technicians and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Primary progressive aphasia with focal periodic sharp wave complexes: An unusual manifestation of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease Effects of sleep deprivation on cortical excitability: A threshold-tracking TMS study and review of the literature The role of clinical neurophysiology in the definition and assessment of fatigue and fatigability Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MND/ALS: IFCN handbook chapter Clinical neurophysiology of REM parasomnias: Diagnostic aspects and insights into pathophysiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1