利用CMR同时评估糖尿病患者冠状动脉、颈动脉和主动脉水平的血管扩张性和血管壁面积:检测血管重构

IF 1.3 American journal of cardiovascular disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01
David Jean Winkel, Lukas Stoiber, Tingting Xiong, Matthias Stuber, Allison G Hays, Ursula Plöckinger, Patrick Doeblin, Christian Stehning, Sebastian Kelle
{"title":"利用CMR同时评估糖尿病患者冠状动脉、颈动脉和主动脉水平的血管扩张性和血管壁面积:检测血管重构","authors":"David Jean Winkel,&nbsp;Lukas Stoiber,&nbsp;Tingting Xiong,&nbsp;Matthias Stuber,&nbsp;Allison G Hays,&nbsp;Ursula Plöckinger,&nbsp;Patrick Doeblin,&nbsp;Christian Stehning,&nbsp;Sebastian Kelle","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>No data is available about the significance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived vascular distensibility (VD) and vessel wall ratio (VWR) for risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of T2DM on VD and VWR using CMR in both central and peripheral territories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one T2DM-patients and nine controls underwent CMR. Angulation of the aorta, the common carotid, and the coronary arteries was performed to obtain cross-sectional vessel areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In T2DM the Carotid-VWR and the Aortic-VWR correlated significantly. Mean values of Carotid-VWR and Aortic-VWR were significantly higher in T2DM than in controls. Coronary-VD was significantly lower in T2DM than in controls. No significant difference in Carotid-VD or Aortic-VD in T2DM vs. controls, respectively, could be observed. In a subgroup of thirteen T2DM patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), Coronary-VD was significantly lower and Aortic-VWR was significantly higher compared to T2DM patients without CAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMR allows a simultaneous evaluation of the structure and function of three important vascular territories to detect vascular remodeling in T2DM.</p>","PeriodicalId":7427,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193244/pdf/ajcd0013-0073.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous assessment of vascular distensibility and vessel wall area at coronary, carotid, and aortic level in diabetic patients using CMR: detection of vascular remodeling.\",\"authors\":\"David Jean Winkel,&nbsp;Lukas Stoiber,&nbsp;Tingting Xiong,&nbsp;Matthias Stuber,&nbsp;Allison G Hays,&nbsp;Ursula Plöckinger,&nbsp;Patrick Doeblin,&nbsp;Christian Stehning,&nbsp;Sebastian Kelle\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>No data is available about the significance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived vascular distensibility (VD) and vessel wall ratio (VWR) for risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of T2DM on VD and VWR using CMR in both central and peripheral territories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-one T2DM-patients and nine controls underwent CMR. Angulation of the aorta, the common carotid, and the coronary arteries was performed to obtain cross-sectional vessel areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In T2DM the Carotid-VWR and the Aortic-VWR correlated significantly. Mean values of Carotid-VWR and Aortic-VWR were significantly higher in T2DM than in controls. Coronary-VD was significantly lower in T2DM than in controls. No significant difference in Carotid-VD or Aortic-VD in T2DM vs. controls, respectively, could be observed. In a subgroup of thirteen T2DM patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), Coronary-VD was significantly lower and Aortic-VWR was significantly higher compared to T2DM patients without CAD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMR allows a simultaneous evaluation of the structure and function of three important vascular territories to detect vascular remodeling in T2DM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of cardiovascular disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193244/pdf/ajcd0013-0073.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of cardiovascular disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cardiovascular disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:没有关于心血管磁共振(CMR)衍生血管扩张性(VD)和血管壁比(VWR)在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者危险分层中的意义的数据。因此,本研究旨在研究T2DM对中央和外周区域VD和VWR的影响。方法:31例t2dm患者和9例对照组行CMR。主动脉、颈总动脉和冠状动脉成角以获得血管横截面积。结果:T2DM患者颈动脉- vwr与主动脉- vwr相关性显著。T2DM患者颈动脉- vwr和主动脉- vwr的平均值明显高于对照组。T2DM患者的冠状动脉vd明显低于对照组。T2DM与对照组相比,颈动脉- vd或主动脉- vd无显著差异。在13例合并冠心病(CAD)的T2DM患者亚组中,与没有冠心病的T2DM患者相比,冠状动脉vd显著降低,主动脉vwr显著升高。结论:CMR可以同时评估三个重要血管区域的结构和功能,以检测T2DM的血管重构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simultaneous assessment of vascular distensibility and vessel wall area at coronary, carotid, and aortic level in diabetic patients using CMR: detection of vascular remodeling.

Aims: No data is available about the significance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) derived vascular distensibility (VD) and vessel wall ratio (VWR) for risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of T2DM on VD and VWR using CMR in both central and peripheral territories.

Methods: Thirty-one T2DM-patients and nine controls underwent CMR. Angulation of the aorta, the common carotid, and the coronary arteries was performed to obtain cross-sectional vessel areas.

Results: In T2DM the Carotid-VWR and the Aortic-VWR correlated significantly. Mean values of Carotid-VWR and Aortic-VWR were significantly higher in T2DM than in controls. Coronary-VD was significantly lower in T2DM than in controls. No significant difference in Carotid-VD or Aortic-VD in T2DM vs. controls, respectively, could be observed. In a subgroup of thirteen T2DM patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), Coronary-VD was significantly lower and Aortic-VWR was significantly higher compared to T2DM patients without CAD.

Conclusion: CMR allows a simultaneous evaluation of the structure and function of three important vascular territories to detect vascular remodeling in T2DM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of cardiovascular disease
American journal of cardiovascular disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Disparities by sex, race, and region in acute myocardial infarction-related outcomes during the early COVID-19 pandemic: the national inpatient sample analysis. Evaluating antiarrhythmic drugs for managing infants with supraventricular tachycardia; a review. Gender-based disparities in outcomes of coronary bifurcation stenting in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of frailty index on cardiovascular outcomes and readmissions of patent foramen ovale closure procedure: a propensity matched national analysis. Percutaneous coronary intervention involving coronary bifurcation is associated with higher mortality and complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1