精神健康恢复过程CHIME框架的系统审查和引用内容分析:制定有影响力的概念框架的建议。

Laurie Hare-Duke, Ashleigh Charles, Mike Slade, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Ada Dys, Daan Bijdevaate
{"title":"精神健康恢复过程CHIME框架的系统审查和引用内容分析:制定有影响力的概念框架的建议。","authors":"Laurie Hare-Duke,&nbsp;Ashleigh Charles,&nbsp;Mike Slade,&nbsp;Stefan Rennick-Egglestone,&nbsp;Ada Dys,&nbsp;Daan Bijdevaate","doi":"10.33137/jrmh.v6i1.38556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify design features of the CHIME conceptual framework of mental health recovery which are associated with high rates of citation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Systematic review of all citations of the Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, and Empowerment (CHIME) framework of mental health recovery. Papers citing CHIME were screened and extracted from three citation databases. Citation content analysis was used to investigate associations between nine CHIME design features. Citations were investigated across six forms of visibility: all citations; Anglophone vs non-Anglophone; academic vs non-academic; academic discipline; professional group; and clinical population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 915 eligible documents identified. Six CHIME framework design features met predefined thresholds for high levels of influence: (i) using a systematic review methodology for development, (ii) adopting a memorable acronym, (iii) having disaggregable components, and being unaligned to a (iv) particular discipline (i.e., transdisciplinary), (v) professional group, or (vi) diagnostic population. Documents from Anglophone countries were more likely to cite CHIME with reference to trans-professional (χ2=3.96, df=1, p=0.05) and ethnicity sub-group analysis (p=0.039) design features than non-Anglophone documents. Non-academic documents were more likely to cite the acronym design feature than academic papers (χ2=5.73, df=1, p=0.01). Public Health-related publications were more likely to cite CHIME within a trans-diagnostic framework (χ2=16.39, df=1, p<0.001) than other disciplines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The influence and impact of conceptual frameworks for recovery are increased when the framework is underpinned by a systematic review, includes disaggregable components which can be summarized using a memorable acronym, and when the framework is transdisciplinary, trans-professional, and trans-diagnostic.</p>","PeriodicalId":73927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of recovery in mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review and citation content analysis of the CHIME framework for mental health recovery processes: recommendations for developing influential conceptual frameworks.\",\"authors\":\"Laurie Hare-Duke,&nbsp;Ashleigh Charles,&nbsp;Mike Slade,&nbsp;Stefan Rennick-Egglestone,&nbsp;Ada Dys,&nbsp;Daan Bijdevaate\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/jrmh.v6i1.38556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify design features of the CHIME conceptual framework of mental health recovery which are associated with high rates of citation.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Systematic review of all citations of the Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, and Empowerment (CHIME) framework of mental health recovery. Papers citing CHIME were screened and extracted from three citation databases. Citation content analysis was used to investigate associations between nine CHIME design features. Citations were investigated across six forms of visibility: all citations; Anglophone vs non-Anglophone; academic vs non-academic; academic discipline; professional group; and clinical population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 915 eligible documents identified. Six CHIME framework design features met predefined thresholds for high levels of influence: (i) using a systematic review methodology for development, (ii) adopting a memorable acronym, (iii) having disaggregable components, and being unaligned to a (iv) particular discipline (i.e., transdisciplinary), (v) professional group, or (vi) diagnostic population. Documents from Anglophone countries were more likely to cite CHIME with reference to trans-professional (χ2=3.96, df=1, p=0.05) and ethnicity sub-group analysis (p=0.039) design features than non-Anglophone documents. Non-academic documents were more likely to cite the acronym design feature than academic papers (χ2=5.73, df=1, p=0.01). Public Health-related publications were more likely to cite CHIME within a trans-diagnostic framework (χ2=16.39, df=1, p<0.001) than other disciplines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The influence and impact of conceptual frameworks for recovery are increased when the framework is underpinned by a systematic review, includes disaggregable components which can be summarized using a memorable acronym, and when the framework is transdisciplinary, trans-professional, and trans-diagnostic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of recovery in mental health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of recovery in mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/jrmh.v6i1.38556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of recovery in mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/jrmh.v6i1.38556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定与高引用率相关的CHIME心理健康康复概念框架的设计特征。研究设计和方法:系统回顾所有引用的心理健康康复的连通性、希望、身份、意义和赋权(CHIME)框架。从三个引文数据库中筛选和提取引用CHIME的论文。引用内容分析用于调查9个CHIME设计特征之间的关联。引用调查了六种形式的可见性:所有引用;英语国家vs非英语国家;学术vs非学术;学科;专业的组织;还有临床人群。结果:共筛选到915份符合要求的文献。六个CHIME框架设计特征满足预定义的高影响阈值:(i)使用系统审查方法进行开发,(ii)采用易于记忆的首字母缩略词,(iii)具有可分解的组件,并且与(iv)特定学科(即跨学科),(v)专业群体或(vi)诊断人群不一致。与非英语国家的文献相比,来自英语国家的文献更有可能引用CHIME的跨专业(χ2=3.96, df=1, p=0.05)和种族亚组分析(p=0.039)设计特征。非学术文献引用首字母缩略词设计特征的可能性高于学术论文(χ2=5.73, df=1, p=0.01)。公共卫生相关的出版物更有可能在跨诊断框架中引用CHIME (χ2=16.39, df=1, p)。结论:当概念框架以系统评价为基础,包括可分解的成分,可以用一个容易记住的首字母缩略词来概括,当框架是跨学科、跨专业和跨诊断时,概念框架对康复的影响和影响就会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic review and citation content analysis of the CHIME framework for mental health recovery processes: recommendations for developing influential conceptual frameworks.

Objectives: To identify design features of the CHIME conceptual framework of mental health recovery which are associated with high rates of citation.

Research design and methods: Systematic review of all citations of the Connectedness, Hope, Identity, Meaning, and Empowerment (CHIME) framework of mental health recovery. Papers citing CHIME were screened and extracted from three citation databases. Citation content analysis was used to investigate associations between nine CHIME design features. Citations were investigated across six forms of visibility: all citations; Anglophone vs non-Anglophone; academic vs non-academic; academic discipline; professional group; and clinical population.

Results: There were 915 eligible documents identified. Six CHIME framework design features met predefined thresholds for high levels of influence: (i) using a systematic review methodology for development, (ii) adopting a memorable acronym, (iii) having disaggregable components, and being unaligned to a (iv) particular discipline (i.e., transdisciplinary), (v) professional group, or (vi) diagnostic population. Documents from Anglophone countries were more likely to cite CHIME with reference to trans-professional (χ2=3.96, df=1, p=0.05) and ethnicity sub-group analysis (p=0.039) design features than non-Anglophone documents. Non-academic documents were more likely to cite the acronym design feature than academic papers (χ2=5.73, df=1, p=0.01). Public Health-related publications were more likely to cite CHIME within a trans-diagnostic framework (χ2=16.39, df=1, p<0.001) than other disciplines.

Conclusions: The influence and impact of conceptual frameworks for recovery are increased when the framework is underpinned by a systematic review, includes disaggregable components which can be summarized using a memorable acronym, and when the framework is transdisciplinary, trans-professional, and trans-diagnostic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Caregiving Challenges and Opportunities in Canada co-production of an intervention facilitating informal caregivers to support adults at risk of suicide and serious self-harm: a brief report Aging Well Together: Promoting Brain Health for Aging Individuals with IDD and Their Families Caregiver Mental Health: A Crucial Piece of the Recovery Puzzle "My Mother Makes Films to Cope with Her Demons": Confronting Normality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1