为小学生及其照顾者开发和验证家庭在线学习过程问卷(OLPQ)。

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-06 DOI:10.1007/s10984-022-09443-9
Joseph Hin Yan Lam, Shelley Xiuli Tong
{"title":"为小学生及其照顾者开发和验证家庭在线学习过程问卷(OLPQ)。","authors":"Joseph Hin Yan Lam,&nbsp;Shelley Xiuli Tong","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09443-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the increasing use of virtual modalities in schools since the COVID-19 pandemic, no systematic tools exist to evaluate the process of online learning. We developed and validated an Online Learning Process Questionnaire (OLPQ) for assessing online at-home learning among 219 Hong Kong primary-school students and 474 caregivers. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of caregivers' data classified the 58-item OLPQ into 11 subscales: (1) learning aims, (2) environmental structuring, (3) learning environment, (4) time management, (5) engagement in learning activities, (6) persistence, (7) interaction between teachers and students, (8) interaction among students, (9) feedback from the interface, (10) application of learning, and (11) meaning of learning under three learning phases. Confirmatory factor analysis of students' data further categorized the 11-subscale framework into three learning phases: preparatory, performance, and transfer. The OLPQ demonstrated excellent reliability and discriminant validity across caregiver (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) and student samples (alpha = 0.98). These findings indicate that the OLPQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the online at-home learning process among both students and their caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 2","pages":"515-538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the online learning process questionnaire (OLPQ) at home for primary-school children and their caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Hin Yan Lam,&nbsp;Shelley Xiuli Tong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10984-022-09443-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the increasing use of virtual modalities in schools since the COVID-19 pandemic, no systematic tools exist to evaluate the process of online learning. We developed and validated an Online Learning Process Questionnaire (OLPQ) for assessing online at-home learning among 219 Hong Kong primary-school students and 474 caregivers. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of caregivers' data classified the 58-item OLPQ into 11 subscales: (1) learning aims, (2) environmental structuring, (3) learning environment, (4) time management, (5) engagement in learning activities, (6) persistence, (7) interaction between teachers and students, (8) interaction among students, (9) feedback from the interface, (10) application of learning, and (11) meaning of learning under three learning phases. Confirmatory factor analysis of students' data further categorized the 11-subscale framework into three learning phases: preparatory, performance, and transfer. The OLPQ demonstrated excellent reliability and discriminant validity across caregiver (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) and student samples (alpha = 0.98). These findings indicate that the OLPQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the online at-home learning process among both students and their caregivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"515-538\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734829/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09443-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09443-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管自新冠肺炎大流行以来,虚拟模式在学校的使用越来越多,但没有系统的工具来评估在线学习的过程。我们开发并验证了在线学习过程问卷(OLPQ),用于评估219名香港小学生和474名护理人员的在线家庭学习。对照顾者数据的探索性和验证性因素分析将58项OLPQ分为11个分量表:(1)学习目标,(2)环境结构,(3)学习环境,(4)时间管理,(5)参与学习活动,(6)坚持性,(7)教师和学生之间的互动,(8)学生之间的交互,(9)界面反馈,(10)学习的应用和(11)三个学习阶段下的学习意义。对学生数据的验证性因素分析进一步将11个分量表框架分为三个学习阶段:准备阶段、表现阶段和迁移阶段。OLPQ在护理人员中表现出良好的可靠性和判别有效性(Cronbachα = 0.98)和学生样本(α = 0.98)。这些发现表明,OLPQ是评估学生及其照顾者在线家庭学习过程的有效和可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of the online learning process questionnaire (OLPQ) at home for primary-school children and their caregivers.

Despite the increasing use of virtual modalities in schools since the COVID-19 pandemic, no systematic tools exist to evaluate the process of online learning. We developed and validated an Online Learning Process Questionnaire (OLPQ) for assessing online at-home learning among 219 Hong Kong primary-school students and 474 caregivers. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of caregivers' data classified the 58-item OLPQ into 11 subscales: (1) learning aims, (2) environmental structuring, (3) learning environment, (4) time management, (5) engagement in learning activities, (6) persistence, (7) interaction between teachers and students, (8) interaction among students, (9) feedback from the interface, (10) application of learning, and (11) meaning of learning under three learning phases. Confirmatory factor analysis of students' data further categorized the 11-subscale framework into three learning phases: preparatory, performance, and transfer. The OLPQ demonstrated excellent reliability and discriminant validity across caregiver (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) and student samples (alpha = 0.98). These findings indicate that the OLPQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the online at-home learning process among both students and their caregivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Learning Environments Research publishes original academic papers dealing with the study of learning environments, including theoretical reflections, reports of quantitative and qualitative research, critical and integrative literature reviews and meta-analyses, discussion of methodological issues, reports of the development and validation of assessment instruments, and reviews of books and evaluation instruments.  The scope of the journal deliberately is very broad in terms of both substance and methods. `Learning environment'' refers to the social, physical, psychological and pedagogical contexts in which learning occurs and which affect student achievement and attitudes. The aim of the journal is to increase our understanding of pre-primary, primary, high school, college and university, and lifelong learning environments irrespective of subject area. Apart from classroom-level and school-level environments, special attention is given to the many out-of-school learning environments such as the home, science centres, and television, etc. The influence of the rapidly developing field of Information Technology with its whole new range of learning environments is an important aspect of the scope of the journal. A wide range of qualitative and quantitative methods for studying learning enviromnents, and the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, are strongly encouraged. The journal has an affiliation with the American Educational Research Association''s Special Interest Group on the Study of Learning Environments. However, having Regional Editors and an Editorial Board from around the world ensures that LER is a truly international journal.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of university online teaching and learning delivery approaches and students’ performance during COVID-19 Adaptation and evaluation of an Estonian version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) Pedagogical strategies employed in the Emergency Remote Learning Environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: The tale of teachers and school ICT coordinators Promoting adolescent subjective well-being: a classroom environment approach Value vs. vulnerability: exploring asynchronous commenting in lecture-capture video recordings for undergraduate medical and dental students and its impact on learning through a pre and post survey design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1