Ayrton Bangolo, Pierre Fwelo, Sowmya Sagireddy, Harin Shah, Chinmay Trivedi, John Bukasa-Kakamba, Rutvij Patel, Luke Bharane, Manraj K Randhawa, Vignesh K Nagesh, Shraboni Dey, Hannah Terefe, Gagan Kaur, Nicholas Dinko, Fatma Lina Emiroglu, Ahmed Mohamed, Mark A Fallorina, David Kosoy, Danish Waqar, Ankita Shenoy, Kareem Ahmed, Anvit Nanavati, Amritpal Singh, Anthony Willie, Diego M C Gonzalez, Deblina Mukherjee, Jayadev Sajja, Tracy Proverbs-Singh, Sameh Elias, Simcha Weissman
{"title":"在过去十年中,年龄和原发部位对原发性胃肠道黑色素瘤生存结局的影响。","authors":"Ayrton Bangolo, Pierre Fwelo, Sowmya Sagireddy, Harin Shah, Chinmay Trivedi, John Bukasa-Kakamba, Rutvij Patel, Luke Bharane, Manraj K Randhawa, Vignesh K Nagesh, Shraboni Dey, Hannah Terefe, Gagan Kaur, Nicholas Dinko, Fatma Lina Emiroglu, Ahmed Mohamed, Mark A Fallorina, David Kosoy, Danish Waqar, Ankita Shenoy, Kareem Ahmed, Anvit Nanavati, Amritpal Singh, Anthony Willie, Diego M C Gonzalez, Deblina Mukherjee, Jayadev Sajja, Tracy Proverbs-Singh, Sameh Elias, Simcha Weissman","doi":"10.3390/medsci11020032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary malignant melanomas of the Gastrointestinal mucosa are uncommon. Most cases of gastrointestinal (GI) melanomas are secondary, arising from metastasis at distant sites. The purpose of this study is to assess to what extent the interaction between independent prognostic factors (age and tumor site) of primary GI melanoma influence survival. Furthermore, we also aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and independent prognostic factors of patients with primary GI melanoma in the past decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 399 patients diagnosed with primary GI melanoma, between 2008 and 2017, were enrolled in our study by retrieving data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We analyzed demographics, clinical characteristics, and overall mortality (OM) as well as cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of primary GI melanoma. Variables with a <i>p</i> value < 0.1 in the univariate Cox regression were incorporated into the multivariate Cox model (model 1) to determine the independent prognostic factors, with a hazard ratio (HR) of greater than 1 representing adverse prognostic factors. Furthermore, we analyzed the effect of the interaction between age and primary location on mortality (model 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analyses revealed higher OM in age group 80+ (HR = 5.653, 95% CI 2.212-14.445, <i>p</i> = 0), stomach location of the tumor (HR = 2.821, 95% CI 1.265-6.292, <i>p</i> = 0.011), regional lymph node involvement only (HR = 1.664, 95% CI 1.051-2.635, <i>p</i> < 0.05), regional involvement by both direct extension and lymph node involvement (HR = 1.755, 95% CI 1.047-2.943, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and distant metastases (HR = 4.491, 95% CI 3.115-6.476, <i>p</i> = 0), whereas the lowest OM was observed in patients with small intestine melanoma (HR = 0.383, 95% CI 0.173-0.846, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analyses of CSM also revealed higher mortality of the same groups and lower CSM in small intestine and colon melanoma excluding the rectum. For model 2, considering the interaction between age and primary site on mortality, higher OM was found in age group 80+, followed by age group 40-59 then age group 60-79, regional lymph node involvement only, regional involvement by both direct extension and lymph node involvement and distant metastases. The small intestine had a lower OM. The rectum as primary location and the age range 40-59 interacted to lower the OM (HR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.89, <i>p</i> = 0.038). Age and primary gastric location did not interact to affect the OM. For the CSM, taking into account the interaction between age and the primary location, higher mortality was found in the same groups and the colon location. The primary colon location also interacted with the age group 40-59 to increase the CSM (HR = 1.38 × 10<sup>9</sup>, 95% CI 7.80 × 10<sup>7</sup>-2.45 × 10<sup>10</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this United States population-based retrospective cohort study using the SEER database, we found that only the age range 40-59 interacted with the rectum and colon to lower and increase mortality respectively. Primary gastric location, which was the single most important location to affect mortality, did not interact with any age range to influence mortality. With those results, we hope to shed some light on this rare pathology with a very dismal prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interaction between Age and Primary Site on Survival Outcomes in Primary GI Melanoma over the Past Decade.\",\"authors\":\"Ayrton Bangolo, Pierre Fwelo, Sowmya Sagireddy, Harin Shah, Chinmay Trivedi, John Bukasa-Kakamba, Rutvij Patel, Luke Bharane, Manraj K Randhawa, Vignesh K Nagesh, Shraboni Dey, Hannah Terefe, Gagan Kaur, Nicholas Dinko, Fatma Lina Emiroglu, Ahmed Mohamed, Mark A Fallorina, David Kosoy, Danish Waqar, Ankita Shenoy, Kareem Ahmed, Anvit Nanavati, Amritpal Singh, Anthony Willie, Diego M C Gonzalez, Deblina Mukherjee, Jayadev Sajja, Tracy Proverbs-Singh, Sameh Elias, Simcha Weissman\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medsci11020032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary malignant melanomas of the Gastrointestinal mucosa are uncommon. Most cases of gastrointestinal (GI) melanomas are secondary, arising from metastasis at distant sites. The purpose of this study is to assess to what extent the interaction between independent prognostic factors (age and tumor site) of primary GI melanoma influence survival. Furthermore, we also aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and independent prognostic factors of patients with primary GI melanoma in the past decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 399 patients diagnosed with primary GI melanoma, between 2008 and 2017, were enrolled in our study by retrieving data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We analyzed demographics, clinical characteristics, and overall mortality (OM) as well as cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of primary GI melanoma. Variables with a <i>p</i> value < 0.1 in the univariate Cox regression were incorporated into the multivariate Cox model (model 1) to determine the independent prognostic factors, with a hazard ratio (HR) of greater than 1 representing adverse prognostic factors. Furthermore, we analyzed the effect of the interaction between age and primary location on mortality (model 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analyses revealed higher OM in age group 80+ (HR = 5.653, 95% CI 2.212-14.445, <i>p</i> = 0), stomach location of the tumor (HR = 2.821, 95% CI 1.265-6.292, <i>p</i> = 0.011), regional lymph node involvement only (HR = 1.664, 95% CI 1.051-2.635, <i>p</i> < 0.05), regional involvement by both direct extension and lymph node involvement (HR = 1.755, 95% CI 1.047-2.943, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and distant metastases (HR = 4.491, 95% CI 3.115-6.476, <i>p</i> = 0), whereas the lowest OM was observed in patients with small intestine melanoma (HR = 0.383, 95% CI 0.173-0.846, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analyses of CSM also revealed higher mortality of the same groups and lower CSM in small intestine and colon melanoma excluding the rectum. For model 2, considering the interaction between age and primary site on mortality, higher OM was found in age group 80+, followed by age group 40-59 then age group 60-79, regional lymph node involvement only, regional involvement by both direct extension and lymph node involvement and distant metastases. The small intestine had a lower OM. The rectum as primary location and the age range 40-59 interacted to lower the OM (HR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.89, <i>p</i> = 0.038). Age and primary gastric location did not interact to affect the OM. For the CSM, taking into account the interaction between age and the primary location, higher mortality was found in the same groups and the colon location. The primary colon location also interacted with the age group 40-59 to increase the CSM (HR = 1.38 × 10<sup>9</sup>, 95% CI 7.80 × 10<sup>7</sup>-2.45 × 10<sup>10</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this United States population-based retrospective cohort study using the SEER database, we found that only the age range 40-59 interacted with the rectum and colon to lower and increase mortality respectively. Primary gastric location, which was the single most important location to affect mortality, did not interact with any age range to influence mortality. With those results, we hope to shed some light on this rare pathology with a very dismal prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204572/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci11020032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci11020032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胃肠道黏膜的原发性恶性黑色素瘤并不常见。大多数胃肠道(GI)黑色素瘤是继发性的,由远处转移引起。本研究的目的是评估原发性胃肠道黑色素瘤的独立预后因素(年龄和肿瘤部位)之间的相互作用在多大程度上影响生存。此外,我们还旨在调查过去十年原发性胃肠道黑色素瘤患者的临床特征、生存结局和独立预后因素。方法:通过从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中检索数据,在2008年至2017年期间,共有399名被诊断为原发性胃肠道黑色素瘤的患者加入了我们的研究。我们分析了原发性胃肠道黑色素瘤的人口统计学、临床特征、总死亡率(OM)以及癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)。将单因素Cox回归中p值< 0.1的变量纳入多因素Cox模型(模型1),确定独立预后因素,风险比(HR)大于1为不良预后因素。此外,我们分析了年龄和原籍地之间的交互作用对死亡率的影响(模型2)。多变量cox比例风险回归分析显示更高的OM年龄组80 + (HR = 5.653, 95% CI 2.212 - -14.445, p = 0),胃肿瘤的位置(HR = 2.821, 95% CI 1.265 - -6.292, p = 0.011),区域淋巴结(HR = 1.664, 95% CI 1.051 - -2.635, p < 0.05),区域参与直接扩展和淋巴结(HR = 1.755, 95% CI 1.047 - -2.943, p < 0.05)和远处转移(HR = 4.491, 95% CI 3.115 - -6.476, p = 0),小肠黑色素瘤患者OM最低(HR = 0.383, 95% CI 0.173 ~ 0.846, p < 0.05)。CSM的多因素cox比例风险回归分析也显示,除直肠外,小肠和结肠黑色素瘤组的死亡率较高,CSM较低。对于模型2,考虑到年龄和原发部位对死亡率的相互作用,80+年龄组的OM较高,其次是40-59年龄组,然后是60-79年龄组,仅局部淋巴结受累,直接延伸和淋巴结受累以及远处转移的区域受累。小肠的OM较低。直肠作为主要部位和年龄范围40-59相互作用可降低OM (HR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.89, p = 0.038)。年龄和胃原发位置没有相互作用影响OM。对于CSM,考虑到年龄和原发位置之间的相互作用,同一组和结肠位置的死亡率更高。原发结肠位置也与40-59岁年龄组相互作用,增加CSM (HR = 1.38 × 109, 95% CI 7.80 × 107-2.45 × 1010, p = 0)。结论:在这项使用SEER数据库的基于美国人群的回顾性队列研究中,我们发现只有40-59岁年龄组与直肠和结肠相互作用,分别降低和增加死亡率。胃原发部位是影响死亡率的最重要的单一部位,与任何年龄范围都没有相互作用来影响死亡率。有了这些结果,我们希望对这种预后非常糟糕的罕见病理有一些了解。
Interaction between Age and Primary Site on Survival Outcomes in Primary GI Melanoma over the Past Decade.
Background: Primary malignant melanomas of the Gastrointestinal mucosa are uncommon. Most cases of gastrointestinal (GI) melanomas are secondary, arising from metastasis at distant sites. The purpose of this study is to assess to what extent the interaction between independent prognostic factors (age and tumor site) of primary GI melanoma influence survival. Furthermore, we also aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and independent prognostic factors of patients with primary GI melanoma in the past decade.
Methods: A total of 399 patients diagnosed with primary GI melanoma, between 2008 and 2017, were enrolled in our study by retrieving data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We analyzed demographics, clinical characteristics, and overall mortality (OM) as well as cancer-specific mortality (CSM) of primary GI melanoma. Variables with a p value < 0.1 in the univariate Cox regression were incorporated into the multivariate Cox model (model 1) to determine the independent prognostic factors, with a hazard ratio (HR) of greater than 1 representing adverse prognostic factors. Furthermore, we analyzed the effect of the interaction between age and primary location on mortality (model 2).
Results: Multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analyses revealed higher OM in age group 80+ (HR = 5.653, 95% CI 2.212-14.445, p = 0), stomach location of the tumor (HR = 2.821, 95% CI 1.265-6.292, p = 0.011), regional lymph node involvement only (HR = 1.664, 95% CI 1.051-2.635, p < 0.05), regional involvement by both direct extension and lymph node involvement (HR = 1.755, 95% CI 1.047-2.943, p < 0.05) and distant metastases (HR = 4.491, 95% CI 3.115-6.476, p = 0), whereas the lowest OM was observed in patients with small intestine melanoma (HR = 0.383, 95% CI 0.173-0.846, p < 0.05). Multivariate cox proportional hazard regression analyses of CSM also revealed higher mortality of the same groups and lower CSM in small intestine and colon melanoma excluding the rectum. For model 2, considering the interaction between age and primary site on mortality, higher OM was found in age group 80+, followed by age group 40-59 then age group 60-79, regional lymph node involvement only, regional involvement by both direct extension and lymph node involvement and distant metastases. The small intestine had a lower OM. The rectum as primary location and the age range 40-59 interacted to lower the OM (HR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.02-0.89, p = 0.038). Age and primary gastric location did not interact to affect the OM. For the CSM, taking into account the interaction between age and the primary location, higher mortality was found in the same groups and the colon location. The primary colon location also interacted with the age group 40-59 to increase the CSM (HR = 1.38 × 109, 95% CI 7.80 × 107-2.45 × 1010, p = 0).
Conclusions: In this United States population-based retrospective cohort study using the SEER database, we found that only the age range 40-59 interacted with the rectum and colon to lower and increase mortality respectively. Primary gastric location, which was the single most important location to affect mortality, did not interact with any age range to influence mortality. With those results, we hope to shed some light on this rare pathology with a very dismal prognosis.