不同框架材料可摘局部义齿内冠与桩核基台的有限元分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.11607/ijp.7269
Gokce Soganci Unsal, Selen Ince Yusufoglu
{"title":"不同框架材料可摘局部义齿内冠与桩核基台的有限元分析。","authors":"Gokce Soganci Unsal,&nbsp;Selen Ince Yusufoglu","doi":"10.11607/ijp.7269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the stress distribution in endocrowns and post-and-core crowns used as abutments for a Kennedy Class I removable partial denture constructed with different framework materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>3D models of a Kennedy Class I mandible were constructed. Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) frameworks were simulated for Models 1 and 2, respectively. An endocrown and a fiber post-and-core crown for the mandibular left and right second premolar abutments, respectively, were simulated for both models. Lithium disilicate porcelain was defined for the crowns. A 200-N occlusal force was applied in the vertical and 30-degree oblique directions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The von Mises stresses were evaluated for the abutments and prostheses, and the principal stresses for the cortical bone under vertical and oblique loading. Endocrowns showed lower stress values than post-and-core crowns in both models. Post-and-core crowns generated the highest stress in Model 2 under vertical loading. The PEEK framework caused higher stress values on the abutments than Co-Cr. Compressive stresses were higher than tensile stresses in cortical bone. The highest compressive stress was observed around the left premolar cortical bone area in Model 1 under oblique loading. Oblique loading caused lower stress values than vertical loading, except for on the minor connectors and cortical bone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From a biomechanical perspective, endocrowns may be more advantageous than post-and-core crowns when used as abutments for a Kennedy Class I removable partial denture. In addition, Co-Cr frameworks showed more favorable stress distribution on abutments than PEEK frameworks. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:203-215. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7269.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":"36 2","pages":"203-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite Element Analysis of Endocrown and Post-and-Core Abutments for Removable Partial Dentures with Different Framework Materials.\",\"authors\":\"Gokce Soganci Unsal,&nbsp;Selen Ince Yusufoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.7269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the stress distribution in endocrowns and post-and-core crowns used as abutments for a Kennedy Class I removable partial denture constructed with different framework materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>3D models of a Kennedy Class I mandible were constructed. Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) frameworks were simulated for Models 1 and 2, respectively. An endocrown and a fiber post-and-core crown for the mandibular left and right second premolar abutments, respectively, were simulated for both models. Lithium disilicate porcelain was defined for the crowns. A 200-N occlusal force was applied in the vertical and 30-degree oblique directions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The von Mises stresses were evaluated for the abutments and prostheses, and the principal stresses for the cortical bone under vertical and oblique loading. Endocrowns showed lower stress values than post-and-core crowns in both models. Post-and-core crowns generated the highest stress in Model 2 under vertical loading. The PEEK framework caused higher stress values on the abutments than Co-Cr. Compressive stresses were higher than tensile stresses in cortical bone. The highest compressive stress was observed around the left premolar cortical bone area in Model 1 under oblique loading. Oblique loading caused lower stress values than vertical loading, except for on the minor connectors and cortical bone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From a biomechanical perspective, endocrowns may be more advantageous than post-and-core crowns when used as abutments for a Kennedy Class I removable partial denture. In addition, Co-Cr frameworks showed more favorable stress distribution on abutments than PEEK frameworks. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:203-215. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7269.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"203-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价不同框架材料制备的Kennedy I类可摘局部义齿内冠和桩核冠作为基台的应力分布。材料与方法:建立Kennedy I级下颌骨的三维模型。模型1和模型2分别模拟了钴铬(Co-Cr)和聚醚醚酮(PEEK)框架。在两种模型中分别模拟下颌左、右第二前磨牙基牙的内冠和纤维桩核冠。冠用二硅酸锂瓷。在垂直方向和30度斜向方向施加200-N的咬合力。结果:评估了基牙和假体的von Mises应力,以及皮质骨在垂直和斜向载荷下的主应力。在两种模型中,内冠的应力值均低于桩核冠。竖向荷载作用下,模型2中桩核冠产生的应力最大。PEEK框架在基台上的应力值高于Co-Cr框架。皮质骨的压应力高于拉应力。斜向加载下,模型1左前磨牙皮质骨区周围的压应力最大。除了在较小的连接物和皮质骨上,斜向加载比垂直加载产生更低的应力值。结论:从生物力学的角度来看,内冠比桩核冠更适合作为Kennedy I类可摘局部义齿的基牙。此外,Co-Cr框架在基台上的应力分布优于PEEK框架。[J]中华口腔医学杂志[J]; 2009; 31(6): 393 - 398。doi: 10.11607 / ijp.7269。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finite Element Analysis of Endocrown and Post-and-Core Abutments for Removable Partial Dentures with Different Framework Materials.

Purpose: To evaluate the stress distribution in endocrowns and post-and-core crowns used as abutments for a Kennedy Class I removable partial denture constructed with different framework materials.

Materials and methods: 3D models of a Kennedy Class I mandible were constructed. Cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) frameworks were simulated for Models 1 and 2, respectively. An endocrown and a fiber post-and-core crown for the mandibular left and right second premolar abutments, respectively, were simulated for both models. Lithium disilicate porcelain was defined for the crowns. A 200-N occlusal force was applied in the vertical and 30-degree oblique directions.

Results: The von Mises stresses were evaluated for the abutments and prostheses, and the principal stresses for the cortical bone under vertical and oblique loading. Endocrowns showed lower stress values than post-and-core crowns in both models. Post-and-core crowns generated the highest stress in Model 2 under vertical loading. The PEEK framework caused higher stress values on the abutments than Co-Cr. Compressive stresses were higher than tensile stresses in cortical bone. The highest compressive stress was observed around the left premolar cortical bone area in Model 1 under oblique loading. Oblique loading caused lower stress values than vertical loading, except for on the minor connectors and cortical bone.

Conclusion: From a biomechanical perspective, endocrowns may be more advantageous than post-and-core crowns when used as abutments for a Kennedy Class I removable partial denture. In addition, Co-Cr frameworks showed more favorable stress distribution on abutments than PEEK frameworks. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:203-215. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7269.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Prosthodontics
International Journal of Prosthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP) Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Abutment Screw Loosening in 24-Degree Angulation-Correcting and Straight Implants: An In Vitro Study. Analysis of Topography, Flexural Strength, and Microstructure of a Lithium Disilicate Glass- Ceramic after Surface Finishing. Aging and Fracture Resistance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Molar Crowns Fabricated from Lithium Disilicate Containing Virgilite. Comparison Between Interocclusal Registration Using Silicone Bite Registration Material and Intraoral Scanner on Clenching Strength. Satisfaction with Labial Reinforcement of Custom-Made Mouthguards Among a Cohort of Rugby Union Players: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1