快速检测SARS-CoV-2抗体的侧流免疫分析法最新进展

IF 2.7 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY AIMS Microbiology Pub Date : 2023-04-13 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3934/microbiol.2023020
Lucia Spicuzza, Davide Campagna, Chiara Di Maria, Enrico Sciacca, Salvatore Mancuso, Carlo Vancheri, Gianluca Sambataro
{"title":"快速检测SARS-CoV-2抗体的侧流免疫分析法最新进展","authors":"Lucia Spicuzza,&nbsp;Davide Campagna,&nbsp;Chiara Di Maria,&nbsp;Enrico Sciacca,&nbsp;Salvatore Mancuso,&nbsp;Carlo Vancheri,&nbsp;Gianluca Sambataro","doi":"10.3934/microbiol.2023020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last three years, after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented number of novel diagnostic tests have been developed. Assays to evaluate the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 have been widely considered as part of the control strategy. The lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), to detect both IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2, has been widely studied as a point-of-care (POC) test. Compared to laboratory tests, LFIAs are faster, cheaper and user-friendly, thus available also in areas with low economic resources. Soon after the onset of the pandemic, numerous kits for rapid antibody detection were put on the market with an emergency use authorization. However, since then, scientists have tried to better define the accuracy of these tests and their usefulness in different contexts. In fact, while during the first phase of the pandemic LFIAs for antibody detection were auxiliary to molecular tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19, successively these tests became a tool of seroprevalence surveillance to address infection control policies. When in 2021 a massive vaccination campaign was implemented worldwide, the interest in LFIA reemerged due to the need to establish the extent and the longevity of immunization in the vaccinated population and to establish priorities to guide health policies in low-income countries with limited access to vaccines. Here, we summarize the accuracy, the advantages and limits of LFIAs as POC tests for antibody detection, highlighting the efforts that have been made to improve this technology over the last few years.</p>","PeriodicalId":46108,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Microbiology","volume":"9 2","pages":"375-401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113162/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An update on lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.\",\"authors\":\"Lucia Spicuzza,&nbsp;Davide Campagna,&nbsp;Chiara Di Maria,&nbsp;Enrico Sciacca,&nbsp;Salvatore Mancuso,&nbsp;Carlo Vancheri,&nbsp;Gianluca Sambataro\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/microbiol.2023020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over the last three years, after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented number of novel diagnostic tests have been developed. Assays to evaluate the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 have been widely considered as part of the control strategy. The lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), to detect both IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2, has been widely studied as a point-of-care (POC) test. Compared to laboratory tests, LFIAs are faster, cheaper and user-friendly, thus available also in areas with low economic resources. Soon after the onset of the pandemic, numerous kits for rapid antibody detection were put on the market with an emergency use authorization. However, since then, scientists have tried to better define the accuracy of these tests and their usefulness in different contexts. In fact, while during the first phase of the pandemic LFIAs for antibody detection were auxiliary to molecular tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19, successively these tests became a tool of seroprevalence surveillance to address infection control policies. When in 2021 a massive vaccination campaign was implemented worldwide, the interest in LFIA reemerged due to the need to establish the extent and the longevity of immunization in the vaccinated population and to establish priorities to guide health policies in low-income countries with limited access to vaccines. Here, we summarize the accuracy, the advantages and limits of LFIAs as POC tests for antibody detection, highlighting the efforts that have been made to improve this technology over the last few years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIMS Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"375-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10113162/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIMS Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2023020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2023020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去三年中,新冠肺炎疫情爆发后,开发了数量空前的新型诊断测试。评估对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的免疫反应的测试被广泛认为是控制策略的一部分。侧流免疫测定法(LFIA)检测针对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的IgM和IgG,作为一种护理点(POC)测试,已被广泛研究。与实验室测试相比,LFIA更快、更便宜、用户友好,因此在经济资源较低的地区也可以使用。疫情爆发后不久,许多用于快速抗体检测的试剂盒被紧急使用授权投放市场。然而,从那时起,科学家们试图更好地定义这些测试的准确性及其在不同情况下的有用性。事实上,尽管在大流行的第一阶段,用于抗体检测的LFIA有助于诊断新冠肺炎的分子检测,但这些检测相继成为血清流行率监测的工具,以解决感染控制政策。2021年,当全球范围内开展大规模疫苗接种运动时,由于需要确定接种人群的免疫接种范围和寿命,并确定优先事项,以指导疫苗获取有限的低收入国家的卫生政策,人们再次对LFIA感兴趣。在这里,我们总结了LFIA作为抗体检测的POC测试的准确性、优势和局限性,强调了过去几年来为改进这项技术所做的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An update on lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Over the last three years, after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented number of novel diagnostic tests have been developed. Assays to evaluate the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 have been widely considered as part of the control strategy. The lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), to detect both IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2, has been widely studied as a point-of-care (POC) test. Compared to laboratory tests, LFIAs are faster, cheaper and user-friendly, thus available also in areas with low economic resources. Soon after the onset of the pandemic, numerous kits for rapid antibody detection were put on the market with an emergency use authorization. However, since then, scientists have tried to better define the accuracy of these tests and their usefulness in different contexts. In fact, while during the first phase of the pandemic LFIAs for antibody detection were auxiliary to molecular tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19, successively these tests became a tool of seroprevalence surveillance to address infection control policies. When in 2021 a massive vaccination campaign was implemented worldwide, the interest in LFIA reemerged due to the need to establish the extent and the longevity of immunization in the vaccinated population and to establish priorities to guide health policies in low-income countries with limited access to vaccines. Here, we summarize the accuracy, the advantages and limits of LFIAs as POC tests for antibody detection, highlighting the efforts that have been made to improve this technology over the last few years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AIMS Microbiology
AIMS Microbiology MICROBIOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biodecomposition with Phanerochaete chrysosporium: A review. Growth characteristics, redox potential changes and proton motive force generation in Thermus scotoductus K1 during growth on various carbon sources. Aspergillus-Penicillium co-culture: An investigation of bioagents for controlling Fusarium proliferatum-induced basal rot in onion. Biopolymer encapsulation for improved probiotic delivery: Advancements and challenges. Diversity of ligninolytic ascomycete fungi associated with the bleached leaf litter in subtropical and temperate forests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1