基于程序的远程医疗在普外科中的应用。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Medical Quality Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000122
Brittany E Levy, Wesley S Wilt, Jenifer Johnson, Heather Wallace, Erik Ballert, Melissa Newcomb, William Cavatassi, Andrew Harris
{"title":"基于程序的远程医疗在普外科中的应用。","authors":"Brittany E Levy,&nbsp;Wesley S Wilt,&nbsp;Jenifer Johnson,&nbsp;Heather Wallace,&nbsp;Erik Ballert,&nbsp;Melissa Newcomb,&nbsp;William Cavatassi,&nbsp;Andrew Harris","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors hypothesize that standardized telehealth (TH) scheduling processes will improve TH utilization without increasing adverse events. Fifty visits preimplementation and 67 visits postimplementation were audited from June 2021 to January 2022. Both leadership and frontline stakeholders were engaged to identify current workflows and potential interventions targeting outpatient elective procedures. Process mapping outlined current TH scheduling workflows. Outcomes related to TH completion, cost, and TH scheduling were collected after implementation. Preimplementation TH scheduling rate was 32%. The intervention required TH postoperative appointments to be scheduled in clinic at the time of surgery scheduling with TH being the default postsurgical appointment for a standardized list of eligible procedures. Following implementation, 95% of patients undergoing eligible procedures had TH follow-up. This provided improved access to surgical follow-up care, by reducing travel needs to the Veterans Affairs facility. Secondarily, this intervention increased clinic appointment availability and resulted in possible increased revenue for billable visits. Standardizing TH scheduling based on the procedure improves the utilization of TH resulting in improved clinic efficiency and increased revenue, without increasing adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":7539,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Quality","volume":"38 3","pages":"154-159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procedure-Based Telehealth Utilization in General Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Brittany E Levy,&nbsp;Wesley S Wilt,&nbsp;Jenifer Johnson,&nbsp;Heather Wallace,&nbsp;Erik Ballert,&nbsp;Melissa Newcomb,&nbsp;William Cavatassi,&nbsp;Andrew Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors hypothesize that standardized telehealth (TH) scheduling processes will improve TH utilization without increasing adverse events. Fifty visits preimplementation and 67 visits postimplementation were audited from June 2021 to January 2022. Both leadership and frontline stakeholders were engaged to identify current workflows and potential interventions targeting outpatient elective procedures. Process mapping outlined current TH scheduling workflows. Outcomes related to TH completion, cost, and TH scheduling were collected after implementation. Preimplementation TH scheduling rate was 32%. The intervention required TH postoperative appointments to be scheduled in clinic at the time of surgery scheduling with TH being the default postsurgical appointment for a standardized list of eligible procedures. Following implementation, 95% of patients undergoing eligible procedures had TH follow-up. This provided improved access to surgical follow-up care, by reducing travel needs to the Veterans Affairs facility. Secondarily, this intervention increased clinic appointment availability and resulted in possible increased revenue for billable visits. Standardizing TH scheduling based on the procedure improves the utilization of TH resulting in improved clinic efficiency and increased revenue, without increasing adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medical Quality\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"154-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medical Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000122\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者假设标准化的远程医疗(TH)调度流程将提高TH的利用率,而不会增加不良事件。从2021年6月至2022年1月,审计了执行前的50次访问和执行后的67次访问。领导和一线利益相关者都参与了确定当前工作流程和针对门诊选择性手术的潜在干预措施。流程映射概述了当前的TH调度工作流。实施后收集与TH完成、成本和TH计划相关的结果。实施前TH调度率为32%。干预措施要求在手术安排时在诊所安排TH术后预约,TH是标准化合格手术列表的默认术后预约。实施后,95%接受符合条件手术的患者进行了TH随访。这减少了前往退伍军人事务机构的旅行需求,从而改善了获得手术后续护理的机会。其次,这种干预增加了诊所预约的可用性,并可能增加可计费访问的收入。基于程序的TH调度标准化提高了TH的利用率,从而提高了临床效率,增加了收入,但没有增加不良事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Procedure-Based Telehealth Utilization in General Surgery.

The authors hypothesize that standardized telehealth (TH) scheduling processes will improve TH utilization without increasing adverse events. Fifty visits preimplementation and 67 visits postimplementation were audited from June 2021 to January 2022. Both leadership and frontline stakeholders were engaged to identify current workflows and potential interventions targeting outpatient elective procedures. Process mapping outlined current TH scheduling workflows. Outcomes related to TH completion, cost, and TH scheduling were collected after implementation. Preimplementation TH scheduling rate was 32%. The intervention required TH postoperative appointments to be scheduled in clinic at the time of surgery scheduling with TH being the default postsurgical appointment for a standardized list of eligible procedures. Following implementation, 95% of patients undergoing eligible procedures had TH follow-up. This provided improved access to surgical follow-up care, by reducing travel needs to the Veterans Affairs facility. Secondarily, this intervention increased clinic appointment availability and resulted in possible increased revenue for billable visits. Standardizing TH scheduling based on the procedure improves the utilization of TH resulting in improved clinic efficiency and increased revenue, without increasing adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Quality (AJMQ) is focused on keeping readers informed of the resources, processes, and perspectives contributing to quality health care services. This peer-reviewed journal presents a forum for the exchange of ideas, strategies, and methods in improving the delivery and management of health care.
期刊最新文献
Standardized Management of Sickle Cell Disease Patients and the Effects on Care Utilization and Costs Primary Care Provider and Staff Wellness and Burnout Levels and Suggestions to Improve Wellness: Analysis of Survey Findings Preparation of Patients for Central Venous Catheter Care in the Home: Perspectives From Health Care Personnel Handoff Education Interventions: A Scoping Review Focused on Sustaining Improvements A Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS) Clinic in Rural New England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1