放置Baerveldt青光眼植入物时应该开多少个孔?实验室研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13181
Michael C Yang, Christopher D Yang, Ken Y Lin
{"title":"放置Baerveldt青光眼植入物时应该开多少个孔?实验室研究。","authors":"Michael C Yang,&nbsp;Christopher D Yang,&nbsp;Ken Y Lin","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the effect of one versus two fenestrations on both fluid egress and opening pressure from a non-valved glaucoma implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this laboratory study, we used an <i>in vitro</i> closed system comprised of ligated silicone tubing connected to a fluid reservoir and manometer to simulate the tubing found in a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Fenestrations were created using an 8-0 Vicryl TG140-8 suture needle. Main outcome measures included volume of fluid egress and fenestration opening pressures, which were measured via micropipette and increasing pressure until fluid egress was observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in fluid egress between tubing with one versus two fenestrations at pressures <math><mo>≤</mo></math>40 mmHg. At 50 mmHg, a statistically significant difference was observed in fluid egress between tubing with one versus two fenestrations (<i>P</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.05). The first fenestration opened at 10.5 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 3.77 mmHg and the second fenestration opened at 28.83 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 5.09 mmHg (average <math><mo>±</mo></math> standard deviation).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our <i>in vitro</i> findings suggest there may exist a critical pressure <math><mo>></mo></math>40 mmHg at which the second fenestration starts to play a significant role in fluid drainage. There may be no difference in the amount of fluid egress and effect on intraocular pressure between one or two tube fenestrations when preoperative intraocular pressure is <math><mo>≤</mo></math>40 mmHg.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Many Fenestrations Should I Make When Placing a Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant? A Laboratory Study.\",\"authors\":\"Michael C Yang,&nbsp;Christopher D Yang,&nbsp;Ken Y Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigates the effect of one versus two fenestrations on both fluid egress and opening pressure from a non-valved glaucoma implant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this laboratory study, we used an <i>in vitro</i> closed system comprised of ligated silicone tubing connected to a fluid reservoir and manometer to simulate the tubing found in a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Fenestrations were created using an 8-0 Vicryl TG140-8 suture needle. Main outcome measures included volume of fluid egress and fenestration opening pressures, which were measured via micropipette and increasing pressure until fluid egress was observed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in fluid egress between tubing with one versus two fenestrations at pressures <math><mo>≤</mo></math>40 mmHg. At 50 mmHg, a statistically significant difference was observed in fluid egress between tubing with one versus two fenestrations (<i>P</i> <math><mo><</mo></math> 0.05). The first fenestration opened at 10.5 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 3.77 mmHg and the second fenestration opened at 28.83 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 5.09 mmHg (average <math><mo>±</mo></math> standard deviation).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our <i>in vitro</i> findings suggest there may exist a critical pressure <math><mo>></mo></math>40 mmHg at which the second fenestration starts to play a significant role in fluid drainage. There may be no difference in the amount of fluid egress and effect on intraocular pressure between one or two tube fenestrations when preoperative intraocular pressure is <math><mo>≤</mo></math>40 mmHg.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"157-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172796/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v18i2.13181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了一个开窗和两个开窗对无瓣膜青光眼植入体的液体流出和开口压力的影响。方法:在本实验室研究中,我们使用了一个由连接到储液器和压力计的结扎硅胶管组成的体外封闭系统来模拟Baerveldt青光眼引流植入物中的管。使用8-0 Vicryl TG140-8缝合针开孔。主要观察指标包括流出液体的体积和开窗压力,通过微移液器测量,并增加压力直到观察到流出液体。结果:在压力≤40 mmHg时,有一个开窗和两个开窗的管子之间的流体排出量无显著差异。在50 mmHg时,有一个开窗和两个开窗的管子之间的流体排出量有统计学意义(p0.05)。第一个开窗为10.5±3.77 mmHg,第二个开窗为28.83±5.09 mmHg(平均值±标准差)。结论:我们的体外研究结果表明,可能存在>40 mmHg的临界压力,第二次开窗在液体引流中开始发挥重要作用。当术前眼压≤40 mmHg时,一管开窗和两管开窗的排液量和对眼压的影响可能没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Many Fenestrations Should I Make When Placing a Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant? A Laboratory Study.

Purpose: This study investigates the effect of one versus two fenestrations on both fluid egress and opening pressure from a non-valved glaucoma implant.

Methods: In this laboratory study, we used an in vitro closed system comprised of ligated silicone tubing connected to a fluid reservoir and manometer to simulate the tubing found in a Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implant. Fenestrations were created using an 8-0 Vicryl TG140-8 suture needle. Main outcome measures included volume of fluid egress and fenestration opening pressures, which were measured via micropipette and increasing pressure until fluid egress was observed.

Results: No significant difference was observed in fluid egress between tubing with one versus two fenestrations at pressures 40 mmHg. At 50 mmHg, a statistically significant difference was observed in fluid egress between tubing with one versus two fenestrations (P < 0.05). The first fenestration opened at 10.5 ± 3.77 mmHg and the second fenestration opened at 28.83 ± 5.09 mmHg (average ± standard deviation).

Conclusion: Our in vitro findings suggest there may exist a critical pressure >40 mmHg at which the second fenestration starts to play a significant role in fluid drainage. There may be no difference in the amount of fluid egress and effect on intraocular pressure between one or two tube fenestrations when preoperative intraocular pressure is 40 mmHg.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: An Updated Comprehensive Review. Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Ocular Graft Versus Host Disease following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Clinical Outcomes of Stage 2 (Pivotal) Use of a Modified Keratoprosthesis Device (ORC-KPro) in Patients with End-stage Corneal Blindness. Doxycycline versus Curcumin for Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression and Activity Following Chemically Induced Inflammation in Corneal Cells. Evaluation of Foveal Vasculature by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography after Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1