高尿酸血症患者合理用药的科普干预。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of health behavior Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.5993/AJHB.47.1.16
Lingling Bi, Tingting Jiang
{"title":"高尿酸血症患者合理用药的科普干预。","authors":"Lingling Bi,&nbsp;Tingting Jiang","doi":"10.5993/AJHB.47.1.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This research aimed to explore the science of population intervention in the rational medication treatment of hyperuricemia patients in China. The research model was designed to determine interventions from three dimensions of science propylitization (empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and skeptical attitude). <b>Methods:</b> The data for this research was collected from hyperuricemia patients in China with a survey-based questionnaire. A partial least square-structural equation modeling statistical method was used for data evaluation. <b>Results:</b> The research investigated that science popularization can strongly influence hyperuricemia patients' rational medication with empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and a skeptical attitude. Furthermore, the research asserted that more focus on scientific knowledge of hyperuricemia patients can improve their health further. <b>Conclusion:</b> Theoretically, this research would have wider implications. First, the research model was based on science popularization interventions which is a novel contribution to the relationship with rational medication. Second, the practical implications of this study would lie in science population interventions improving the rational medications for hyperuricemia patients. Besides, this research asserted a few future directions for scholars to contribute and determine the impact of further variables to enhance the model of science popularization in relationship with rational medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":7699,"journal":{"name":"American journal of health behavior","volume":"47 1","pages":"153-164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science Popularization Interventions on Rational Medication in Patients with Hyperuricemia.\",\"authors\":\"Lingling Bi,&nbsp;Tingting Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.5993/AJHB.47.1.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This research aimed to explore the science of population intervention in the rational medication treatment of hyperuricemia patients in China. The research model was designed to determine interventions from three dimensions of science propylitization (empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and skeptical attitude). <b>Methods:</b> The data for this research was collected from hyperuricemia patients in China with a survey-based questionnaire. A partial least square-structural equation modeling statistical method was used for data evaluation. <b>Results:</b> The research investigated that science popularization can strongly influence hyperuricemia patients' rational medication with empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and a skeptical attitude. Furthermore, the research asserted that more focus on scientific knowledge of hyperuricemia patients can improve their health further. <b>Conclusion:</b> Theoretically, this research would have wider implications. First, the research model was based on science popularization interventions which is a novel contribution to the relationship with rational medication. Second, the practical implications of this study would lie in science population interventions improving the rational medications for hyperuricemia patients. Besides, this research asserted a few future directions for scholars to contribute and determine the impact of further variables to enhance the model of science popularization in relationship with rational medication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of health behavior\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"153-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of health behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.47.1.16\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of health behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.47.1.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨人群干预在中国高尿酸血症患者合理用药治疗中的科学作用。研究模型旨在从科学丙化的三个维度(经验证据、逻辑推理和怀疑态度)确定干预措施。方法:采用问卷调查的方式收集中国高尿酸血症患者的资料。采用偏最小二乘结构方程建模统计方法对数据进行评价。结果:本研究以经验证据、逻辑推理和怀疑态度调查了科普对高尿酸血症患者合理用药的强烈影响。此外,该研究还断言,更多地关注高尿酸血症患者的科学知识可以进一步改善他们的健康状况。结论:理论上,本研究具有更广泛的意义。首先,基于科普干预的研究模式为研究与合理用药的关系做出了新的贡献。第二,本研究的实际意义在于科学的人群干预,提高高尿酸血症患者的合理用药。此外,本研究还提出了一些未来的研究方向,供学者们贡献,并确定进一步变量的影响,以完善科普与合理用药的关系模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Science Popularization Interventions on Rational Medication in Patients with Hyperuricemia.

Objective: This research aimed to explore the science of population intervention in the rational medication treatment of hyperuricemia patients in China. The research model was designed to determine interventions from three dimensions of science propylitization (empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and skeptical attitude). Methods: The data for this research was collected from hyperuricemia patients in China with a survey-based questionnaire. A partial least square-structural equation modeling statistical method was used for data evaluation. Results: The research investigated that science popularization can strongly influence hyperuricemia patients' rational medication with empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and a skeptical attitude. Furthermore, the research asserted that more focus on scientific knowledge of hyperuricemia patients can improve their health further. Conclusion: Theoretically, this research would have wider implications. First, the research model was based on science popularization interventions which is a novel contribution to the relationship with rational medication. Second, the practical implications of this study would lie in science population interventions improving the rational medications for hyperuricemia patients. Besides, this research asserted a few future directions for scholars to contribute and determine the impact of further variables to enhance the model of science popularization in relationship with rational medication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of health behavior
American journal of health behavior PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal seeks to improve the quality of life through multidisciplinary health efforts in fostering a better understanding of the multidimensional nature of both individuals and social systems as they relate to health behaviors.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of early non-responders within behavioral weight loss treatment. Student Perspectives on Campus Tobacco Policy: A Photovoice Study Efficacy of An Immersive Nature-based Virtual Reality Program on Depression, Emotional Health, and Qualityof-Life among Care Facility Residents with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and its Related Dementias (ADRD) Effect of Early Rehabilitation Nursing on Patients with Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis Analysis of Awareness Status and Factors Influencing Different Populations towards Public Health Emergencies during the COVID-19 Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1