皮肤牵引在成人股骨近端骨折中的应用。有什么影响,优点和缺点?范围审查

Melania Miedico , Fabrizio Quattrini , Salvatore Emanuele Attardo , Margherita Marchioni , Maria Chiara Bassi , Enrico Lucenti , Leopoldo Sarli , Massimo Guasconi
{"title":"皮肤牵引在成人股骨近端骨折中的应用。有什么影响,优点和缺点?范围审查","authors":"Melania Miedico ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Quattrini ,&nbsp;Salvatore Emanuele Attardo ,&nbsp;Margherita Marchioni ,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Bassi ,&nbsp;Enrico Lucenti ,&nbsp;Leopoldo Sarli ,&nbsp;Massimo Guasconi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hip surgery is normally the chosen therapy for proximal femur fractures. Surgery within 24–48 h after hip fracture is recommended, but surgery may not always be performed promptly. Consequently, skin-traction is applied to reduce complications. The purpose of this review is to assess both advantages and disadvantages of skin traction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted. The research question was: which are the effects of skin traction, its advantages and disadvantages in adult patients with proximal femur fractures hospitalised in orthopaedic wards? The search was done in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, DOAJ, ClinicalTrials.gov and OpenDissertation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>9 records were included, skin traction effects were summarised in 7 categories: pain, pressure sores, comfort and relaxation, thromboembolism, damage from adhesive, complications and quality of care. The possible advantage is pain reduction between 24 and 60 h, the possible disadvantage is skin damage.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>The routine use of skin traction does not appear recommended, but more consistent evidence is necessary to make clinic decisions. Future RCTs could focus on the effects of skin traction 24–60 h after hospitalisation and before surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of skin traction in the adult patients with proximal femur fracture. What are the effects, advantages and disadvantages? A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Melania Miedico ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Quattrini ,&nbsp;Salvatore Emanuele Attardo ,&nbsp;Margherita Marchioni ,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Bassi ,&nbsp;Enrico Lucenti ,&nbsp;Leopoldo Sarli ,&nbsp;Massimo Guasconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hip surgery is normally the chosen therapy for proximal femur fractures. Surgery within 24–48 h after hip fracture is recommended, but surgery may not always be performed promptly. Consequently, skin-traction is applied to reduce complications. The purpose of this review is to assess both advantages and disadvantages of skin traction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A scoping review was conducted. The research question was: which are the effects of skin traction, its advantages and disadvantages in adult patients with proximal femur fractures hospitalised in orthopaedic wards? The search was done in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, DOAJ, ClinicalTrials.gov and OpenDissertation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>9 records were included, skin traction effects were summarised in 7 categories: pain, pressure sores, comfort and relaxation, thromboembolism, damage from adhesive, complications and quality of care. The possible advantage is pain reduction between 24 and 60 h, the possible disadvantage is skin damage.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>The routine use of skin traction does not appear recommended, but more consistent evidence is necessary to make clinic decisions. Future RCTs could focus on the effects of skin traction 24–60 h after hospitalisation and before surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124123000084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124123000084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景髋关节手术通常是股骨近端骨折的首选治疗方法。建议在髋部骨折后24-48小时内进行手术,但手术可能并不总是及时进行。因此,应用皮肤牵引来减少并发症。本综述的目的是评估皮肤牵引的优点和缺点。方法进行范围界定审查。研究问题是:在骨科病房住院的股骨近端骨折成年患者中,皮肤牵引的效果、优点和缺点是什么?在PubMed、CINAHL、Cochrane、Embase、DOAJ、ClinicalTrials.gov和OpenDissertation数据库中进行搜索。结果包括9项记录,皮肤牵引效果总结为7类:疼痛、压疮、舒适和放松、血栓栓塞、粘合剂损伤、并发症和护理质量。可能的优点是在24到60小时之间减轻疼痛,可能的缺点是皮肤损伤。讨论和结论似乎不建议常规使用皮肤牵引,但需要更一致的证据来做出临床决定。未来的随机对照试验可以集中于住院后24-60小时和手术前皮肤牵引的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The use of skin traction in the adult patients with proximal femur fracture. What are the effects, advantages and disadvantages? A scoping review

Background

Hip surgery is normally the chosen therapy for proximal femur fractures. Surgery within 24–48 h after hip fracture is recommended, but surgery may not always be performed promptly. Consequently, skin-traction is applied to reduce complications. The purpose of this review is to assess both advantages and disadvantages of skin traction.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted. The research question was: which are the effects of skin traction, its advantages and disadvantages in adult patients with proximal femur fractures hospitalised in orthopaedic wards? The search was done in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, DOAJ, ClinicalTrials.gov and OpenDissertation.

Results

9 records were included, skin traction effects were summarised in 7 categories: pain, pressure sores, comfort and relaxation, thromboembolism, damage from adhesive, complications and quality of care. The possible advantage is pain reduction between 24 and 60 h, the possible disadvantage is skin damage.

Discussion and conclusion

The routine use of skin traction does not appear recommended, but more consistent evidence is necessary to make clinic decisions. Future RCTs could focus on the effects of skin traction 24–60 h after hospitalisation and before surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Current status of postoperative care for elderly osteoporotic fracture patients in Jiangsu Province, China: A multicenter cross-sectional study Corrigendum to "The effectiveness of prophylactic closed incision negative pressure wound therapy compared to conventional dressings in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection post hip and knee revision arthroplasty surgery: A systematic review" [Int. J. Orthopaed. Trauma Nurs. 53 (2024) 101048]. LITERATURE REVIEWS – The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on bone healing and tissue regeneration Health literacy of older adults with musculoskeletal problems: A systematic review Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1