检查监管重点在护士参与和疲劳周期的加速和减速。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000375
Samantha C Paustian-Underdahl, Jonathon R B Halbesleben, Dawn S Carlson, Hanadi Y Hamadi
{"title":"检查监管重点在护士参与和疲劳周期的加速和减速。","authors":"Samantha C Paustian-Underdahl,&nbsp;Jonathon R B Halbesleben,&nbsp;Dawn S Carlson,&nbsp;Hanadi Y Hamadi","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given that emotional exhaustion and nurse engagement have significant implications for nurse well-being and organizational performance, determining how to increase nurse engagement while reducing nurse exhaustion is of value.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Resource loss and gain cycles, as theorized in conservation of resources theory, are examined using the experience of emotional exhaustion to evaluate loss cycles and work engagement to evaluate gain cycles. Furthermore, we integrate conservation of resources theory with regulatory focus theory to examine how the ways in which individuals approach work goals serves as a facilitator to the acceleration and deceleration of both of these cycles.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>Using data from nurses working in a hospital in the Midwest United States at six time points spanning over 2 years, we demonstrate the accumulation effects of the cycles over time using latent change score modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that prevention focus was associated with the accelerated accumulation effects of emotional exhaustion and that promotion focus was associated with the accelerated accumulation effects of work engagement. Furthermore, prevention focus attenuated the acceleration of engagement, but promotion did not influence the acceleration of exhaustion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that individual factors such as regulatory focus are key to helping nurses to better control their resource gain and loss cycles.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>We provide implications for nurse managers and health care administrators to help encourage promotion focus and suppress prevention focus in the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"48 3","pages":"282-290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining regulatory focus in the acceleration and deceleration of engagement and exhaustion cycles among nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha C Paustian-Underdahl,&nbsp;Jonathon R B Halbesleben,&nbsp;Dawn S Carlson,&nbsp;Hanadi Y Hamadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given that emotional exhaustion and nurse engagement have significant implications for nurse well-being and organizational performance, determining how to increase nurse engagement while reducing nurse exhaustion is of value.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Resource loss and gain cycles, as theorized in conservation of resources theory, are examined using the experience of emotional exhaustion to evaluate loss cycles and work engagement to evaluate gain cycles. Furthermore, we integrate conservation of resources theory with regulatory focus theory to examine how the ways in which individuals approach work goals serves as a facilitator to the acceleration and deceleration of both of these cycles.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>Using data from nurses working in a hospital in the Midwest United States at six time points spanning over 2 years, we demonstrate the accumulation effects of the cycles over time using latent change score modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that prevention focus was associated with the accelerated accumulation effects of emotional exhaustion and that promotion focus was associated with the accelerated accumulation effects of work engagement. Furthermore, prevention focus attenuated the acceleration of engagement, but promotion did not influence the acceleration of exhaustion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that individual factors such as regulatory focus are key to helping nurses to better control their resource gain and loss cycles.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>We provide implications for nurse managers and health care administrators to help encourage promotion focus and suppress prevention focus in the workplace.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"282-290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:鉴于情绪耗竭和护士敬业度对护士幸福感和组织绩效有重要影响,确定如何在减少护士耗竭的同时提高护士敬业度是有价值的。目的:根据资源保护理论的理论,利用情绪耗竭的经验来评估损失周期和工作投入来评估获得周期来检验资源损失和获得周期。此外,我们将资源保护理论与监管焦点理论相结合,以研究个人实现工作目标的方式如何促进这两个循环的加速和减速。方法/方法:使用来自美国中西部一家医院的护士在2年以上的6个时间点的数据,我们使用潜在变化评分模型证明了周期随时间的累积效应。结果:预防焦点与情绪耗竭的加速积累效应相关,提升焦点与工作投入的加速积累效应相关。此外,预防重点减弱了参与的加速,但促进没有影响疲惫的加速。结论:我们的研究结果表明,监管重点等个体因素是帮助护士更好地控制其资源损益周期的关键。实践启示:我们为护士管理者和卫生保健管理者提供启示,以帮助鼓励工作场所的促进重点和抑制预防重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining regulatory focus in the acceleration and deceleration of engagement and exhaustion cycles among nurses.

Background: Given that emotional exhaustion and nurse engagement have significant implications for nurse well-being and organizational performance, determining how to increase nurse engagement while reducing nurse exhaustion is of value.

Purpose: Resource loss and gain cycles, as theorized in conservation of resources theory, are examined using the experience of emotional exhaustion to evaluate loss cycles and work engagement to evaluate gain cycles. Furthermore, we integrate conservation of resources theory with regulatory focus theory to examine how the ways in which individuals approach work goals serves as a facilitator to the acceleration and deceleration of both of these cycles.

Methodology/approach: Using data from nurses working in a hospital in the Midwest United States at six time points spanning over 2 years, we demonstrate the accumulation effects of the cycles over time using latent change score modeling.

Results: We found that prevention focus was associated with the accelerated accumulation effects of emotional exhaustion and that promotion focus was associated with the accelerated accumulation effects of work engagement. Furthermore, prevention focus attenuated the acceleration of engagement, but promotion did not influence the acceleration of exhaustion.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that individual factors such as regulatory focus are key to helping nurses to better control their resource gain and loss cycles.

Practice implications: We provide implications for nurse managers and health care administrators to help encourage promotion focus and suppress prevention focus in the workplace.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
期刊最新文献
Improving joy at work and reducing burnout in health care workers in Victoria, Australia using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement joy in work framework: A mixed-methods study. What makes proactive behaviors at work effective? Perspectives of health care executives. Stanford Network for Advancement and Promotion: The impact of a community building-focused leadership development program on the success of underrepresented groups in academic medicine. Exploring barriers to employee voice among certified nursing assistants: A qualitative study. Good therapeutic connections and patient psychological safety: A qualitative survey study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1