Sahil Khurana, Ajay Pal Singh, Ashok Kumar, Rajeev Nema
{"title":"AKT亚型在非小细胞肺腺癌中的预后价值。","authors":"Sahil Khurana, Ajay Pal Singh, Ashok Kumar, Rajeev Nema","doi":"10.7555/JBR.36.20220138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in the world and has a high mortality rate. Lung cancer patients often have a poor prognosis, with a five-year survival rate of only about 16%. The International Agency for Research on Cancer reports that lung cancer was the main cause of cancer deaths in 2020, accounting for 1.80 million deaths. Due to the dismal overall prognosis of lung cancer, there is an urgent need to develop accurate and effective diagnostic tests that target specifically early oncogenic pathways in lung cancer patients to improve their prognosis. The two principal types of lung cancer are small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), with NSCLC accounting for around 85% of all lung malignancies[1]. The region frequency and prevalence of the lung disease are controlled by both genotypic and phenotypic exposures. An accurate lung cancer diagnosis is essential for the patient's better survival for two main reasons: appropriate drug selection and effective treatment prediction. Histopathological diagnosis depends on cell shape and the nucleus-to-cytoplasm size ratio to distinguish SCLC from NSCLC. Surgical resection, aggressive or palliative radiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are frequently used to treat lung cancer. In the modern era, gene-targeted treatments against tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibodies against mutations in driver genes for lung cancer are being developed. Several mutations have been shown to be the most common in lung cancer. For example, mutations in the K-ras proto-oncogene cause 10% to 30% of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), while epidermal growth factor receptor mutations are more frequent in squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC)[2]. Kaplan-Meier plotter (KM plotter) database (http://kmplot.com/analysis/) is a commonly used database for the real-time meta-analysis of published lung cancer microarray datasets to find survival biomarkers[3]. In a number of malignancies, the KM plotter has also been used to discover genes that may serve as possible prognostic indicators for postprogression survival (PPS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)[3]. Many human malignancies, including lung cancer, have activated and overexpressed AKT isoforms[4]. AKT2 inhibition aids in the suppression of LUAD cell proliferation and colony expansion. Therefore, the significance of AKT isoforms in the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer was investigated in the current study. The association between gene specific mRNA expression and OS was analyzed by the KM plotter. Currently, gene expression and survival data from 1927 patients with a follow-up period of 20 years are available. Gene names of AKT isoforms (i.e., AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3) were entered into the KM plotter database to obtain survival plots. The association between mRNA expression levels of different AKT isoforms and the established clinicopathological features was studied. The patient data were linked to OS as well as the sex of the patients. We found that high AKT1 mRNA expression was not significantly associated with OS in patients with lung cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.27, P=0.071) or patients with SqCLC (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67–1.07; P=0.16), but was significantly associated with a poor OS in patients with LUAD (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.31–2.11; P=2.1e−05 (Fig. 1A–C). High AKT2 mRNA expression was also substantially associated with a","PeriodicalId":15061,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Research","volume":"37 3","pages":"225-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of AKT isoforms in non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Sahil Khurana, Ajay Pal Singh, Ashok Kumar, Rajeev Nema\",\"doi\":\"10.7555/JBR.36.20220138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dear Editor, Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in the world and has a high mortality rate. Lung cancer patients often have a poor prognosis, with a five-year survival rate of only about 16%. The International Agency for Research on Cancer reports that lung cancer was the main cause of cancer deaths in 2020, accounting for 1.80 million deaths. Due to the dismal overall prognosis of lung cancer, there is an urgent need to develop accurate and effective diagnostic tests that target specifically early oncogenic pathways in lung cancer patients to improve their prognosis. The two principal types of lung cancer are small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), with NSCLC accounting for around 85% of all lung malignancies[1]. The region frequency and prevalence of the lung disease are controlled by both genotypic and phenotypic exposures. An accurate lung cancer diagnosis is essential for the patient's better survival for two main reasons: appropriate drug selection and effective treatment prediction. Histopathological diagnosis depends on cell shape and the nucleus-to-cytoplasm size ratio to distinguish SCLC from NSCLC. Surgical resection, aggressive or palliative radiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are frequently used to treat lung cancer. In the modern era, gene-targeted treatments against tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibodies against mutations in driver genes for lung cancer are being developed. Several mutations have been shown to be the most common in lung cancer. For example, mutations in the K-ras proto-oncogene cause 10% to 30% of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), while epidermal growth factor receptor mutations are more frequent in squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC)[2]. Kaplan-Meier plotter (KM plotter) database (http://kmplot.com/analysis/) is a commonly used database for the real-time meta-analysis of published lung cancer microarray datasets to find survival biomarkers[3]. In a number of malignancies, the KM plotter has also been used to discover genes that may serve as possible prognostic indicators for postprogression survival (PPS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)[3]. Many human malignancies, including lung cancer, have activated and overexpressed AKT isoforms[4]. AKT2 inhibition aids in the suppression of LUAD cell proliferation and colony expansion. Therefore, the significance of AKT isoforms in the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer was investigated in the current study. The association between gene specific mRNA expression and OS was analyzed by the KM plotter. Currently, gene expression and survival data from 1927 patients with a follow-up period of 20 years are available. Gene names of AKT isoforms (i.e., AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3) were entered into the KM plotter database to obtain survival plots. The association between mRNA expression levels of different AKT isoforms and the established clinicopathological features was studied. The patient data were linked to OS as well as the sex of the patients. We found that high AKT1 mRNA expression was not significantly associated with OS in patients with lung cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.27, P=0.071) or patients with SqCLC (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67–1.07; P=0.16), but was significantly associated with a poor OS in patients with LUAD (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.31–2.11; P=2.1e−05 (Fig. 1A–C). High AKT2 mRNA expression was also substantially associated with a\",\"PeriodicalId\":15061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Research\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"225-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.36.20220138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.36.20220138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prognostic value of AKT isoforms in non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma.
Dear Editor, Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in the world and has a high mortality rate. Lung cancer patients often have a poor prognosis, with a five-year survival rate of only about 16%. The International Agency for Research on Cancer reports that lung cancer was the main cause of cancer deaths in 2020, accounting for 1.80 million deaths. Due to the dismal overall prognosis of lung cancer, there is an urgent need to develop accurate and effective diagnostic tests that target specifically early oncogenic pathways in lung cancer patients to improve their prognosis. The two principal types of lung cancer are small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), with NSCLC accounting for around 85% of all lung malignancies[1]. The region frequency and prevalence of the lung disease are controlled by both genotypic and phenotypic exposures. An accurate lung cancer diagnosis is essential for the patient's better survival for two main reasons: appropriate drug selection and effective treatment prediction. Histopathological diagnosis depends on cell shape and the nucleus-to-cytoplasm size ratio to distinguish SCLC from NSCLC. Surgical resection, aggressive or palliative radiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy are frequently used to treat lung cancer. In the modern era, gene-targeted treatments against tyrosine kinase inhibitors and antibodies against mutations in driver genes for lung cancer are being developed. Several mutations have been shown to be the most common in lung cancer. For example, mutations in the K-ras proto-oncogene cause 10% to 30% of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), while epidermal growth factor receptor mutations are more frequent in squamous cell lung cancer (SqCLC)[2]. Kaplan-Meier plotter (KM plotter) database (http://kmplot.com/analysis/) is a commonly used database for the real-time meta-analysis of published lung cancer microarray datasets to find survival biomarkers[3]. In a number of malignancies, the KM plotter has also been used to discover genes that may serve as possible prognostic indicators for postprogression survival (PPS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)[3]. Many human malignancies, including lung cancer, have activated and overexpressed AKT isoforms[4]. AKT2 inhibition aids in the suppression of LUAD cell proliferation and colony expansion. Therefore, the significance of AKT isoforms in the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer was investigated in the current study. The association between gene specific mRNA expression and OS was analyzed by the KM plotter. Currently, gene expression and survival data from 1927 patients with a follow-up period of 20 years are available. Gene names of AKT isoforms (i.e., AKT1, AKT2, and AKT3) were entered into the KM plotter database to obtain survival plots. The association between mRNA expression levels of different AKT isoforms and the established clinicopathological features was studied. The patient data were linked to OS as well as the sex of the patients. We found that high AKT1 mRNA expression was not significantly associated with OS in patients with lung cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.27, P=0.071) or patients with SqCLC (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.67–1.07; P=0.16), but was significantly associated with a poor OS in patients with LUAD (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.31–2.11; P=2.1e−05 (Fig. 1A–C). High AKT2 mRNA expression was also substantially associated with a