总氨基酸水平影响猪饲料成分标准化回肠消化率测定结果

IF 6.3 Animal Nutrition Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aninu.2022.08.018
Darlene J. Bloxham , Michael Azain , Gene M. Pesti , Shu-Biao Wu
{"title":"总氨基酸水平影响猪饲料成分标准化回肠消化率测定结果","authors":"Darlene J. Bloxham ,&nbsp;Michael Azain ,&nbsp;Gene M. Pesti ,&nbsp;Shu-Biao Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.aninu.2022.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It has been demonstrated that the fiber content of oilseed meals and total amino acids (AA) in distillers' grains products affects standardized ileal digestibility (SID) values from swine assays and that total protein concentration affects the AA digestibility in assays using chickens. This analysis was conducted to test the hypothesis that the total AA content of test samples affects the SID assay results. Databases containing total AA profiles and SID values of 20 feedstuffs commonly fed to pigs from 2 sources, AMINODat 5.0 (Evonik Industries, 2015) and the Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 12th edition (NRC, 2012) were used to compare AA concentration effects on standardized ileal digestibility coefficients. Databases were compared with AA and SID available in both data sets. The total AA values were similar for the 2 databases with an <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> of 0.979 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The linear relationship between digestibility coefficients from the 2 databases was highly significant, an <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> of 0.810 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Both databases had increased SID values with increasing AA contents within and across feed ingredients. The SID = <em>f</em>(AA concentration) relationship was confirmed with an individual paper. Since SID, as typically measured, is a function of both digestion and absorption, both processes following Michaelis–Menten kinetics, SID = <em>f</em>(AA concentration) may simply be a natural phenomenon. Other reasons for the relationship were explored. Methods of estimating endogenous AA losses and misapplication statistical procedures may contribute to variation in results and at least partially explain why SID = <em>f</em>(AA concentration).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62604,"journal":{"name":"Animal Nutrition","volume":"13 ","pages":"Pages 19-30"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/70/main.PMC10034567.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total amino acid level affects the results of standardized ileal digestibility assays for feed ingredients for swine\",\"authors\":\"Darlene J. Bloxham ,&nbsp;Michael Azain ,&nbsp;Gene M. Pesti ,&nbsp;Shu-Biao Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aninu.2022.08.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It has been demonstrated that the fiber content of oilseed meals and total amino acids (AA) in distillers' grains products affects standardized ileal digestibility (SID) values from swine assays and that total protein concentration affects the AA digestibility in assays using chickens. This analysis was conducted to test the hypothesis that the total AA content of test samples affects the SID assay results. Databases containing total AA profiles and SID values of 20 feedstuffs commonly fed to pigs from 2 sources, AMINODat 5.0 (Evonik Industries, 2015) and the Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 12th edition (NRC, 2012) were used to compare AA concentration effects on standardized ileal digestibility coefficients. Databases were compared with AA and SID available in both data sets. The total AA values were similar for the 2 databases with an <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> of 0.979 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The linear relationship between digestibility coefficients from the 2 databases was highly significant, an <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> of 0.810 (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Both databases had increased SID values with increasing AA contents within and across feed ingredients. The SID = <em>f</em>(AA concentration) relationship was confirmed with an individual paper. Since SID, as typically measured, is a function of both digestion and absorption, both processes following Michaelis–Menten kinetics, SID = <em>f</em>(AA concentration) may simply be a natural phenomenon. Other reasons for the relationship were explored. Methods of estimating endogenous AA losses and misapplication statistical procedures may contribute to variation in results and at least partially explain why SID = <em>f</em>(AA concentration).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":62604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 19-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/82/70/main.PMC10034567.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1091\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405654522001482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405654522001482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

已经证明,油籽粕的纤维含量和酒糟产品中的总氨基酸(AA)影响猪试验的标准回肠消化率(SID)值,并且在使用鸡的试验中,总蛋白质浓度影响AA消化率。进行该分析是为了检验测试样品的总AA含量影响SID测定结果的假设。使用包含两种来源(AMINODat 5.0(赢创工业,2015)和《猪的营养需求》第12版(NRC,2012))的20种常用饲料的总AA图谱和SID值的数据库来比较AA浓度对标准化回肠消化率系数的影响。将数据库与两个数据集中可用的AA和SID进行比较。两个数据库的总AA值相似,R2为0.979(P<0.001)。两个数据库消化率系数之间的线性关系非常显著,R2为0.810(P<001)。随着饲料成分内和饲料成分间AA含量的增加,两个数据库都具有增加的SID值。SID=f(AA浓度)的关系用一篇单独的论文证实。由于通常测量的SID是消化和吸收的函数,这两个过程都遵循Michaelis–Menten动力学,因此SID=f(AA浓度)可能只是一种自然现象。探讨了这种关系的其他原因。估计内源性AA损失的方法和统计程序的误用可能会导致结果的变化,并至少部分解释为什么SID=f(AA浓度)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Total amino acid level affects the results of standardized ileal digestibility assays for feed ingredients for swine

It has been demonstrated that the fiber content of oilseed meals and total amino acids (AA) in distillers' grains products affects standardized ileal digestibility (SID) values from swine assays and that total protein concentration affects the AA digestibility in assays using chickens. This analysis was conducted to test the hypothesis that the total AA content of test samples affects the SID assay results. Databases containing total AA profiles and SID values of 20 feedstuffs commonly fed to pigs from 2 sources, AMINODat 5.0 (Evonik Industries, 2015) and the Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 12th edition (NRC, 2012) were used to compare AA concentration effects on standardized ileal digestibility coefficients. Databases were compared with AA and SID available in both data sets. The total AA values were similar for the 2 databases with an R2 of 0.979 (P < 0.001). The linear relationship between digestibility coefficients from the 2 databases was highly significant, an R2 of 0.810 (P < 0.001). Both databases had increased SID values with increasing AA contents within and across feed ingredients. The SID = f(AA concentration) relationship was confirmed with an individual paper. Since SID, as typically measured, is a function of both digestion and absorption, both processes following Michaelis–Menten kinetics, SID = f(AA concentration) may simply be a natural phenomenon. Other reasons for the relationship were explored. Methods of estimating endogenous AA losses and misapplication statistical procedures may contribute to variation in results and at least partially explain why SID = f(AA concentration).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Nutrition
Animal Nutrition Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
542
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Animal Nutrition encompasses the full gamut of animal nutritional sciences and reviews including, but not limited to, fundamental aspects of animal nutrition such as nutritional requirements, metabolic studies, body composition, energetics, immunology, neuroscience, microbiology, genetics and molecular and cell biology related to primarily to the nutrition of farm animals and aquatic species. More applied aspects of animal nutrition, such as the evaluation of novel ingredients, feed additives and feed safety will also be considered but it is expected that such studies will have a strong nutritional focus. Animal Nutrition is indexed in SCIE, PubMed Central, Scopus, DOAJ, etc.
期刊最新文献
Re-evaluation of recent research on metabolic utilization of energy in poultry: Recommendations for a net energy system for broilers Editorial Board Effects of essential oils on economically important characteristics of ruminant species: A comprehensive review Mulberry leaf supplementation inhibits skatole deposition by regulating gut microbiota and upregulating liver cytochrome P450 1A1 expression in finishing pigs Zinc lactate alleviates oxidative stress by modulating crosstalk between constitutive androstane receptor signaling pathway and gut microbiota profile in weaned piglets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1