子宫腺肌病临床试验终点的评价——系统综述。

IF 1.4 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Reviews on recent clinical trials Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1574887118666230329104546
Kiran Kumar Rathinam, Justin Jacob Abraham, Harish K, Heema Preethy S, Sunita Samal, Melvin George
{"title":"子宫腺肌病临床试验终点的评价——系统综述。","authors":"Kiran Kumar Rathinam,&nbsp;Justin Jacob Abraham,&nbsp;Harish K,&nbsp;Heema Preethy S,&nbsp;Sunita Samal,&nbsp;Melvin George","doi":"10.2174/1574887118666230329104546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adenomyosis lacks approved pharmacological treatment even after decades of its identification. We performed this study to review the status of clinical research on adenomyosis for finding an effective drug therapy and to identify the most common endpoints used in adenomyosis trials. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov registries to identify interventional trials for analysis without any time and language restrictions. Our search revealed that barely 15 drugs have been assessed for the management of adenomyosis from 2001 to 2021. Among these, LNG-IUS was found to be the most evaluated drug, followed by dienogest. In these trials, the most commonly assessed endpoints included VAS, NPRS for pain, haemoglobin and PBAC for menstrual bleeding, uterine volume, and serum estradiol. There appears to be a need for developing a comprehensive score that takes into consideration all disease symptoms as well as incorporates some objective elements to evaluate the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":21174,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Endpoints Used in Clinical Trials on Adenomyosis - A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kiran Kumar Rathinam,&nbsp;Justin Jacob Abraham,&nbsp;Harish K,&nbsp;Heema Preethy S,&nbsp;Sunita Samal,&nbsp;Melvin George\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1574887118666230329104546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adenomyosis lacks approved pharmacological treatment even after decades of its identification. We performed this study to review the status of clinical research on adenomyosis for finding an effective drug therapy and to identify the most common endpoints used in adenomyosis trials. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov registries to identify interventional trials for analysis without any time and language restrictions. Our search revealed that barely 15 drugs have been assessed for the management of adenomyosis from 2001 to 2021. Among these, LNG-IUS was found to be the most evaluated drug, followed by dienogest. In these trials, the most commonly assessed endpoints included VAS, NPRS for pain, haemoglobin and PBAC for menstrual bleeding, uterine volume, and serum estradiol. There appears to be a need for developing a comprehensive score that takes into consideration all disease symptoms as well as incorporates some objective elements to evaluate the disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews on recent clinical trials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews on recent clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574887118666230329104546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574887118666230329104546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

子宫腺肌病缺乏批准的药物治疗,即使经过几十年的识别。我们进行这项研究是为了回顾子宫腺肌病的临床研究现状,以寻找有效的药物治疗方法,并确定子宫腺肌病试验中最常用的终点。在PubMed和Clinicaltrials.gov注册库中进行系统搜索,以确定无时间和语言限制的干预性试验进行分析。我们的研究显示,从2001年到2021年,只有15种药物被评估用于治疗子宫腺肌症。其中,LNG-IUS是评价最高的药物,其次是dienogest。在这些试验中,最常评估的终点包括VAS、疼痛的NPRS、月经出血的血红蛋白和PBAC、子宫体积和血清雌二醇。似乎有必要制定一个综合评分,考虑到所有疾病症状,并纳入一些客观因素来评估疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Endpoints Used in Clinical Trials on Adenomyosis - A Systematic Review.

Adenomyosis lacks approved pharmacological treatment even after decades of its identification. We performed this study to review the status of clinical research on adenomyosis for finding an effective drug therapy and to identify the most common endpoints used in adenomyosis trials. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov registries to identify interventional trials for analysis without any time and language restrictions. Our search revealed that barely 15 drugs have been assessed for the management of adenomyosis from 2001 to 2021. Among these, LNG-IUS was found to be the most evaluated drug, followed by dienogest. In these trials, the most commonly assessed endpoints included VAS, NPRS for pain, haemoglobin and PBAC for menstrual bleeding, uterine volume, and serum estradiol. There appears to be a need for developing a comprehensive score that takes into consideration all disease symptoms as well as incorporates some objective elements to evaluate the disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews on recent clinical trials
Reviews on recent clinical trials PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials publishes frontier reviews on recent clinical trials of major importance. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles in the field. Topics covered include: important Phase I – IV clinical trial studies, clinical investigations at all stages of development and therapeutics. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug therapy and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Upright Position during the First Stage of Labour on Maternal Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Study on Rapid, Quantitative, and Simultaneous Detection of Drug Residues and Immunoassay in Chickens. Impact of a Symbiotic Mixture on Moderate-to-severe Diverticular Disease of the Colon. Vanek's Tumour as a Rare Cause of Dyspeptic Syndrome in a Patient with Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Case Report. Is There an Association between 5a Reductase Inhibitors and Metabolic Syndrome? A Narrative Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1