Michael C Moran, Lisa J Heaton, Brian G Leroux, Natasha M Flake
{"title":"大麻使用者和非使用者的局部麻醉效果:一项初步研究。","authors":"Michael C Moran, Lisa J Heaton, Brian G Leroux, Natasha M Flake","doi":"10.2344/anpr-69-02-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the common clinical impression that patients with a history of drug use are challenging to anesthetize with local anesthesia, literature on this clinical phenomenon is sparse. The objective of this pilot study was to assess if differences in local anesthetic efficacy for dental treatment exist between marijuana users and nonusers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were healthy adult males and females who qualified as either chronic marijuana users or nonusers. All subjects had an asymptomatic, vital maxillary lateral incisor that responded to an electric pulp test (EPT). A standard maxillary infiltration injection technique was employed using 1.7 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine over the test tooth, and the tooth was tested with an EPT at 3-minute intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88% of nonusers (15/17) and 61% of users (11/18) were successfully anesthetized, defined as anesthesia onset within 10 minutes and lasting at least 15 minutes. The difference in the proportion of anesthetized subjects was not statistically significant (P = .073). For subjects with successful anesthesia, there was no significant difference between nonusers and users in the onset or duration of anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences in local anesthetic efficacy with respect to local anesthetic success, onset, or duration of action were found between chronic marijuana users and nonusers. However, larger studies are likely needed to provide more definitive evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":7818,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"69 4","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773404/pdf/i1878-7177-69-4-15.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local Anesthetic Efficacy in Marijuana Users and Nonusers: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Michael C Moran, Lisa J Heaton, Brian G Leroux, Natasha M Flake\",\"doi\":\"10.2344/anpr-69-02-08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the common clinical impression that patients with a history of drug use are challenging to anesthetize with local anesthesia, literature on this clinical phenomenon is sparse. The objective of this pilot study was to assess if differences in local anesthetic efficacy for dental treatment exist between marijuana users and nonusers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were healthy adult males and females who qualified as either chronic marijuana users or nonusers. All subjects had an asymptomatic, vital maxillary lateral incisor that responded to an electric pulp test (EPT). A standard maxillary infiltration injection technique was employed using 1.7 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine over the test tooth, and the tooth was tested with an EPT at 3-minute intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88% of nonusers (15/17) and 61% of users (11/18) were successfully anesthetized, defined as anesthesia onset within 10 minutes and lasting at least 15 minutes. The difference in the proportion of anesthetized subjects was not statistically significant (P = .073). For subjects with successful anesthesia, there was no significant difference between nonusers and users in the onset or duration of anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences in local anesthetic efficacy with respect to local anesthetic success, onset, or duration of action were found between chronic marijuana users and nonusers. However, larger studies are likely needed to provide more definitive evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"volume\":\"69 4\",\"pages\":\"15-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9773404/pdf/i1878-7177-69-4-15.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-69-02-08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-69-02-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:尽管临床普遍认为有药物使用史的患者局部麻醉困难,但关于这一临床现象的文献很少。本初步研究的目的是评估大麻使用者和非使用者之间是否存在局部麻醉对牙科治疗的疗效差异。方法:受试者为健康成年男性和女性,符合慢性大麻使用者或非使用者的条件。所有受试者都有一个无症状的、重要的上颌侧切牙,对电牙髓测试(EPT)有反应。采用标准上颌浸润注射技术,将1.7 mL 2%利多卡因与1:10万肾上腺素加在测试牙齿上,每隔3分钟进行EPT测试。结果:88%的非服用者(15/17)和61%的服用者(11/18)成功麻醉,定义为麻醉在10分钟内开始并持续至少15分钟。麻醉受试者比例差异无统计学意义(P = 0.073)。对于成功麻醉的受试者,在麻醉的开始时间和持续时间上,非使用者和使用者之间没有显著差异。结论:慢性大麻使用者和非大麻使用者在局部麻醉成功、起效或作用时间方面的局部麻醉疗效无显著差异。然而,可能需要更大规模的研究来提供更明确的证据。
Local Anesthetic Efficacy in Marijuana Users and Nonusers: A Pilot Study.
Objective: Despite the common clinical impression that patients with a history of drug use are challenging to anesthetize with local anesthesia, literature on this clinical phenomenon is sparse. The objective of this pilot study was to assess if differences in local anesthetic efficacy for dental treatment exist between marijuana users and nonusers.
Methods: Subjects were healthy adult males and females who qualified as either chronic marijuana users or nonusers. All subjects had an asymptomatic, vital maxillary lateral incisor that responded to an electric pulp test (EPT). A standard maxillary infiltration injection technique was employed using 1.7 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine over the test tooth, and the tooth was tested with an EPT at 3-minute intervals.
Results: A total of 88% of nonusers (15/17) and 61% of users (11/18) were successfully anesthetized, defined as anesthesia onset within 10 minutes and lasting at least 15 minutes. The difference in the proportion of anesthetized subjects was not statistically significant (P = .073). For subjects with successful anesthesia, there was no significant difference between nonusers and users in the onset or duration of anesthesia.
Conclusion: No significant differences in local anesthetic efficacy with respect to local anesthetic success, onset, or duration of action were found between chronic marijuana users and nonusers. However, larger studies are likely needed to provide more definitive evidence.
期刊介绍:
Anesthesia Progress is a peer-reviewed journal and the official publication of the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology. The journal is dedicated to providing a better understanding of the advances being made in the art and science of pain and anxiety control in dentistry.