{"title":"需要证明书政策与安宁疗护质量结果之间的关联。","authors":"Arlen G Gaines, John G Cagle","doi":"10.1177/10499091231180613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Certificate of need (CON) laws are state-based regulations requiring approval of new healthcare entities and capital expenditures. Varying by state, these regulations impact hospices in 14 states and DC, with several states re-examining provisions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This cross-sectional study examined the association of CON status on hospice quality outcomes using the hospice item set metric (HIS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data from the February 2022 Medicare Hospice Provider and General Information reports of 4870 US hospices were used to compare group means of the 8 HIS measures across CON status. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict HIS outcomes by CON status while controlling for ownership and size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 86% of hospices are in states without a hospice CON provision. The unadjusted mean HIS scores for all measures were higher in CON states (M range 94.40-99.59) than Non-CON (M range 90.50-99.53) with significant differences in all except treatment preferences. In the adjusted model, linear regression analyses showed hospice CON states had significantly higher HIS ratings than those from Non-CON states for beliefs and values addressed (β = .05, <i>P</i> = .009), pain assessment (β = .05, <i>P</i> = .009), dyspnea treatment (β = .08, <i>P</i> < .001) and the composite measure (β = .09, <i>P</i> < .001). Treatment preferences, pain screening, dyspnea screening, and opioid bowel treatment were not statistically significant (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that CON regulations may have a modest, but beneficial impact on hospice-reported quality outcomes, particularly for small and medium-sized hospices. Further research is needed to explore other factors that contribute to HIS outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"471-478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations Between Certificate of Need Policies and Hospice Quality Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Arlen G Gaines, John G Cagle\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091231180613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Certificate of need (CON) laws are state-based regulations requiring approval of new healthcare entities and capital expenditures. Varying by state, these regulations impact hospices in 14 states and DC, with several states re-examining provisions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This cross-sectional study examined the association of CON status on hospice quality outcomes using the hospice item set metric (HIS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data from the February 2022 Medicare Hospice Provider and General Information reports of 4870 US hospices were used to compare group means of the 8 HIS measures across CON status. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict HIS outcomes by CON status while controlling for ownership and size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 86% of hospices are in states without a hospice CON provision. The unadjusted mean HIS scores for all measures were higher in CON states (M range 94.40-99.59) than Non-CON (M range 90.50-99.53) with significant differences in all except treatment preferences. In the adjusted model, linear regression analyses showed hospice CON states had significantly higher HIS ratings than those from Non-CON states for beliefs and values addressed (β = .05, <i>P</i> = .009), pain assessment (β = .05, <i>P</i> = .009), dyspnea treatment (β = .08, <i>P</i> < .001) and the composite measure (β = .09, <i>P</i> < .001). Treatment preferences, pain screening, dyspnea screening, and opioid bowel treatment were not statistically significant (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that CON regulations may have a modest, but beneficial impact on hospice-reported quality outcomes, particularly for small and medium-sized hospices. Further research is needed to explore other factors that contribute to HIS outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"471-478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231180613\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231180613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:需求证明(CON)法是以州为基础的法规,要求批准新的医疗实体和资本支出。这些法规因州而异,对 14 个州和华盛顿特区的安宁疗护机构产生影响,其中有几个州正在重新审查相关规定。目的:本横断面研究使用安宁疗护项目组指标(HIS),考察了 CON 状态与安宁疗护质量结果之间的关联:设计:使用来自 2022 年 2 月 4870 家美国安宁疗护机构的医疗保险安宁疗护提供者和一般信息报告中的数据,比较不同 CON 状态下 8 项 HIS 指标的组平均值。在控制所有权和规模的同时,使用多元回归分析预测不同CON状态下的HIS结果:结果:大约86%的临终关怀机构所在的州没有临终关怀CON条款。有安宁疗护协议州的所有衡量指标的未调整平均 HIS 分数(中值范围 94.40-99.59)均高于无安宁疗护协议州(中值范围 90.50-99.53),除治疗偏好外,其他指标均存在显著差异。在调整后的模型中,线性回归分析表明,安宁疗护CON州在以下方面的HIS评分明显高于非CON州:信念和价值观(β = .05,P = .009)、疼痛评估(β = .05,P = .009)、呼吸困难治疗(β = .08,P < .001)和综合测量(β = .09,P < .001)。治疗偏好、疼痛筛查、呼吸困难筛查和阿片类药物肠道治疗均无统计学意义(P > .05):该研究表明,CON 法规可能会对安宁疗护机构报告的质量结果产生适度但有益的影响,尤其是对中小型安宁疗护机构而言。还需要进一步的研究来探索影响安宁疗护结果的其他因素。
Associations Between Certificate of Need Policies and Hospice Quality Outcomes.
Background: Certificate of need (CON) laws are state-based regulations requiring approval of new healthcare entities and capital expenditures. Varying by state, these regulations impact hospices in 14 states and DC, with several states re-examining provisions.
Aim: This cross-sectional study examined the association of CON status on hospice quality outcomes using the hospice item set metric (HIS).
Design: Data from the February 2022 Medicare Hospice Provider and General Information reports of 4870 US hospices were used to compare group means of the 8 HIS measures across CON status. Multiple regression analysis was used to predict HIS outcomes by CON status while controlling for ownership and size.
Results: Approximately 86% of hospices are in states without a hospice CON provision. The unadjusted mean HIS scores for all measures were higher in CON states (M range 94.40-99.59) than Non-CON (M range 90.50-99.53) with significant differences in all except treatment preferences. In the adjusted model, linear regression analyses showed hospice CON states had significantly higher HIS ratings than those from Non-CON states for beliefs and values addressed (β = .05, P = .009), pain assessment (β = .05, P = .009), dyspnea treatment (β = .08, P < .001) and the composite measure (β = .09, P < .001). Treatment preferences, pain screening, dyspnea screening, and opioid bowel treatment were not statistically significant (P > .05).
Conclusion: The study suggests that CON regulations may have a modest, but beneficial impact on hospice-reported quality outcomes, particularly for small and medium-sized hospices. Further research is needed to explore other factors that contribute to HIS outcomes.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).