圈养北方大加拉戈斯(Otolemur garnettii)饲喂实验性“食草”和“无脊椎动物”日粮的可变消化率。

IF 1.2 4区 生物学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Zoo Biology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1002/zoo.21773
James E Loudon, B Katherine Smith, Sydnie Bianchi, Michaela E Howells, Mead A Krowka, Andres M Gomez, Samuel Davison, Oliver C C Paine, Matt Sponheimer
{"title":"圈养北方大加拉戈斯(Otolemur garnettii)饲喂实验性“食草”和“无脊椎动物”日粮的可变消化率。","authors":"James E Loudon,&nbsp;B Katherine Smith,&nbsp;Sydnie Bianchi,&nbsp;Michaela E Howells,&nbsp;Mead A Krowka,&nbsp;Andres M Gomez,&nbsp;Samuel Davison,&nbsp;Oliver C C Paine,&nbsp;Matt Sponheimer","doi":"10.1002/zoo.21773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few studies have addressed the nutritional ecology of galagos. Observations of galagos in the wild reveal that they rely on fruits and invertebrates to varying degrees depending on their availability. We conducted a 6-week comparative dietary analysis of a colony of captive-housed northern greater galagos (Otolemur garnettii), which included five females and six males with known life histories. We compared two experimental diets. The first was fruit dominated and the second was invertebrate dominated. For each diet, we examined dietary intake and apparent dry matter digestibility over the course of 6 weeks. We found significant differences between the apparent digestibility of the diets, with the \"invertebrate\" diet being more digestible than the \"frugivorous\" diet. The lower apparent digestibility of the \"frugivorous\" diet was driven by the higher fiber contents of the fruits provided to the colony. However, variation in apparent digestibility of both diets was found among individual galagos. The experimental design used in this study may provide useful dietary data for the management of captive colonies of galagos and other strepsirrhine primates. This study may also be helpful for understanding the nutritional challenges faced by free-ranging galagos through time and across geographic space.</p>","PeriodicalId":24035,"journal":{"name":"Zoo Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variable digestibility of captive northern greater galagos (Otolemur garnettii) fed experimental \\\"frugivorous\\\" and \\\"invertebrate\\\" diets.\",\"authors\":\"James E Loudon,&nbsp;B Katherine Smith,&nbsp;Sydnie Bianchi,&nbsp;Michaela E Howells,&nbsp;Mead A Krowka,&nbsp;Andres M Gomez,&nbsp;Samuel Davison,&nbsp;Oliver C C Paine,&nbsp;Matt Sponheimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/zoo.21773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Few studies have addressed the nutritional ecology of galagos. Observations of galagos in the wild reveal that they rely on fruits and invertebrates to varying degrees depending on their availability. We conducted a 6-week comparative dietary analysis of a colony of captive-housed northern greater galagos (Otolemur garnettii), which included five females and six males with known life histories. We compared two experimental diets. The first was fruit dominated and the second was invertebrate dominated. For each diet, we examined dietary intake and apparent dry matter digestibility over the course of 6 weeks. We found significant differences between the apparent digestibility of the diets, with the \\\"invertebrate\\\" diet being more digestible than the \\\"frugivorous\\\" diet. The lower apparent digestibility of the \\\"frugivorous\\\" diet was driven by the higher fiber contents of the fruits provided to the colony. However, variation in apparent digestibility of both diets was found among individual galagos. The experimental design used in this study may provide useful dietary data for the management of captive colonies of galagos and other strepsirrhine primates. This study may also be helpful for understanding the nutritional challenges faced by free-ranging galagos through time and across geographic space.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoo Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoo Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21773\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoo Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21773","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很少有研究涉及加拉戈斯的营养生态学。对野生加拉戈斯的观察表明,它们在不同程度上依赖水果和无脊椎动物,这取决于它们的可用性。我们对圈养的北方大加拉戈斯(Otolemur garnettii)进行了为期6周的比较饮食分析,其中包括5只已知生活史的雌性和6只已知生活历史的雄性。我们比较了两种实验性饮食。第一种以果实为主,第二种以无脊椎动物为主。对于每种饮食,我们在6周内检查了饮食摄入量和表观干物质消化率。我们发现两种饮食的表观消化率之间存在显著差异,“无脊椎动物”饮食比“食草”饮食更容易消化。“食果”日粮表观消化率较低的原因是提供给群体的水果纤维含量较高。然而,两种日粮的表观消化率在加拉戈斯个体之间存在差异。本研究中使用的实验设计可能为加拉戈斯和其他strepsirrhine灵长类动物圈养群体的管理提供有用的饮食数据。这项研究也可能有助于了解自由放养的加拉戈斯在时间和地理空间上面临的营养挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Variable digestibility of captive northern greater galagos (Otolemur garnettii) fed experimental "frugivorous" and "invertebrate" diets.

Few studies have addressed the nutritional ecology of galagos. Observations of galagos in the wild reveal that they rely on fruits and invertebrates to varying degrees depending on their availability. We conducted a 6-week comparative dietary analysis of a colony of captive-housed northern greater galagos (Otolemur garnettii), which included five females and six males with known life histories. We compared two experimental diets. The first was fruit dominated and the second was invertebrate dominated. For each diet, we examined dietary intake and apparent dry matter digestibility over the course of 6 weeks. We found significant differences between the apparent digestibility of the diets, with the "invertebrate" diet being more digestible than the "frugivorous" diet. The lower apparent digestibility of the "frugivorous" diet was driven by the higher fiber contents of the fruits provided to the colony. However, variation in apparent digestibility of both diets was found among individual galagos. The experimental design used in this study may provide useful dietary data for the management of captive colonies of galagos and other strepsirrhine primates. This study may also be helpful for understanding the nutritional challenges faced by free-ranging galagos through time and across geographic space.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zoo Biology
Zoo Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoo Biology is concerned with reproduction, demographics, genetics, behavior, medicine, husbandry, nutrition, conservation and all empirical aspects of the exhibition and maintenance of wild animals in wildlife parks, zoos, and aquariums. This diverse journal offers a forum for effectively communicating scientific findings, original ideas, and critical thinking related to the role of wildlife collections and their unique contribution to conservation.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Serum Ferritin's Connection to the Acute Phase Response in Zoo-Managed African Rhinoceroses. Liver and Let Die? A Retrospective Analysis of Secretarybird Mortality in European Zoos. Ambassador Animals Do Not Have a Clear Effect on Visitor Conservation Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Exotic Pets at a Zoo Exhibit. Captive Breeding Reveals Insights Into the Ecology and Reproductive Biology of 11 Little-Known Malagasy Frog Species. Deep Dive Into Noninvasive Biometrics: A Pilot Journey Using Stereo-Video in a Public Aquarium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1