阿尔茨海默病的全球认知轨迹模式。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International psychogeriatrics Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-25 DOI:10.1017/S1041610222000047
Carl I Cohen, Barry Reisberg, Robert Yaffee
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病的全球认知轨迹模式。","authors":"Carl I Cohen, Barry Reisberg, Robert Yaffee","doi":"10.1017/S1041610222000047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The literature on Alzheimer's disease (AD) provides little data about long-term cognitive course trajectories. We identify global cognitive outcome trajectories and associated predictor variables that may inform clinical research and care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data derived from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set were used to examine the cognitive course of persons with possible or probable AD, a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) of ≥10, and complete annual assessments for 5 years.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirty-six Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Four hundred and fourteen persons.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We used a hybrid approach comprising qualitative analysis of MMSE trajectory graphs that were operationalized empirically and binary logistic regression analyses to assess 19 variables' associations with each trajectory. MMSE scores of ±3 points or greater were considered clinically meaningful.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five distinct cognitive trajectories were identified: fast decliners (32.6%), slow decliners (30.7%), zigzag stable (15.9%), stable (15.9%), and improvers (4.8%). The decliner groups had three subtypes: curvilinear, zigzag, and late decline. The fast decliners were associated with female gender, lower baseline MMSE scores, a shorter illness duration, or receiving a cognitive enhancer. An early MMSE decline of ≥3 points predicted a worse outcome. A higher rate of traumatic brain injury, the absence of an ApoE ϵ4 allele, and male gender were the strongest predictors of favorable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our hybrid approach revealed five distinct cognitive trajectories and a variegated pattern within the decliners and stable/improvers that was more consistent with real-world clinical experience than prior statistically modeled studies. Future investigations need to determine the consistency of the distribution of these categories across settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"200-209"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global cognitive trajectory patterns in Alzheimer's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Carl I Cohen, Barry Reisberg, Robert Yaffee\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1041610222000047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The literature on Alzheimer's disease (AD) provides little data about long-term cognitive course trajectories. We identify global cognitive outcome trajectories and associated predictor variables that may inform clinical research and care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data derived from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set were used to examine the cognitive course of persons with possible or probable AD, a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) of ≥10, and complete annual assessments for 5 years.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirty-six Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Four hundred and fourteen persons.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We used a hybrid approach comprising qualitative analysis of MMSE trajectory graphs that were operationalized empirically and binary logistic regression analyses to assess 19 variables' associations with each trajectory. MMSE scores of ±3 points or greater were considered clinically meaningful.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five distinct cognitive trajectories were identified: fast decliners (32.6%), slow decliners (30.7%), zigzag stable (15.9%), stable (15.9%), and improvers (4.8%). The decliner groups had three subtypes: curvilinear, zigzag, and late decline. The fast decliners were associated with female gender, lower baseline MMSE scores, a shorter illness duration, or receiving a cognitive enhancer. An early MMSE decline of ≥3 points predicted a worse outcome. A higher rate of traumatic brain injury, the absence of an ApoE ϵ4 allele, and male gender were the strongest predictors of favorable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our hybrid approach revealed five distinct cognitive trajectories and a variegated pattern within the decliners and stable/improvers that was more consistent with real-world clinical experience than prior statistically modeled studies. Future investigations need to determine the consistency of the distribution of these categories across settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"200-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610222000047\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610222000047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于阿尔茨海默病(AD)的文献提供的关于长期认知过程轨迹的数据很少。我们确定了全球认知结果轨迹和相关的预测变量,这些变量可能会为临床研究和护理提供信息。设计:来自国家阿尔茨海默氏症协调中心(NACC)统一数据集的数据用于检查可能或可能患有AD的人的认知过程、≥10的迷你精神状态检查(MMSE),并完成5年的年度评估。背景:36个阿尔茨海默病研究中心。参与者:414人。测量:我们使用了一种混合方法,包括经验操作的MMSE轨迹图的定性分析和二元逻辑回归分析,以评估19个变量与每个轨迹的关联。MMSE评分为±3分或以上被认为具有临床意义。结果:确定了五种不同的认知轨迹:快速下降者(32.6%)、缓慢下降者(30.7%)、Z字形稳定者(15.9%)、稳定者(159%)和改进者(4.8%)。下降者组有三种亚型:曲线型、Z字形和晚期下降。快速下降者与女性、基线MMSE评分较低、病程较短或接受认知增强剂有关。早期MMSE下降≥3分预示着更糟糕的结果。较高的创伤性脑损伤发生率、ApoEε4等位基因的缺失和男性是有利结果的最强预测因素。结论:我们的混合方法揭示了五种不同的认知轨迹,以及衰退者和稳定/改善者的多样化模式,这比之前的统计建模研究更符合现实世界的临床经验。未来的调查需要确定这些类别在不同环境中分布的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global cognitive trajectory patterns in Alzheimer's disease.

Objectives: The literature on Alzheimer's disease (AD) provides little data about long-term cognitive course trajectories. We identify global cognitive outcome trajectories and associated predictor variables that may inform clinical research and care.

Design: Data derived from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set were used to examine the cognitive course of persons with possible or probable AD, a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) of ≥10, and complete annual assessments for 5 years.

Setting: Thirty-six Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers.

Participants: Four hundred and fourteen persons.

Measurements: We used a hybrid approach comprising qualitative analysis of MMSE trajectory graphs that were operationalized empirically and binary logistic regression analyses to assess 19 variables' associations with each trajectory. MMSE scores of ±3 points or greater were considered clinically meaningful.

Results: Five distinct cognitive trajectories were identified: fast decliners (32.6%), slow decliners (30.7%), zigzag stable (15.9%), stable (15.9%), and improvers (4.8%). The decliner groups had three subtypes: curvilinear, zigzag, and late decline. The fast decliners were associated with female gender, lower baseline MMSE scores, a shorter illness duration, or receiving a cognitive enhancer. An early MMSE decline of ≥3 points predicted a worse outcome. A higher rate of traumatic brain injury, the absence of an ApoE ϵ4 allele, and male gender were the strongest predictors of favorable outcomes.

Conclusions: Our hybrid approach revealed five distinct cognitive trajectories and a variegated pattern within the decliners and stable/improvers that was more consistent with real-world clinical experience than prior statistically modeled studies. Future investigations need to determine the consistency of the distribution of these categories across settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Sleep-related measurements to assess sleep disturbances among people living with dementia in nursing homes: a systematic review Measuring clinically relevant change in apathy symptoms in ADMET and ADMET 2 The effect of study partner characteristics on the reporting of neuropsychiatric symptoms across the neurocognitive spectrum The Cambodia training program on older persons' mental health and well-being: what International Psychogeriatric Association members have to offer. Unveiling hope: how social support reciprocity shields against the shadows of intimate partner violence and suicidal ideation in rural Chinese older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1