基于测量的护理对精神病学的影响:综合评述。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/10783903231177707
Janine DeSimone, Bryan R Hansen
{"title":"基于测量的护理对精神病学的影响:综合评述。","authors":"Janine DeSimone, Bryan R Hansen","doi":"10.1177/10783903231177707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality of mental health treatment has not progressed to the same extent as physical health treatment. Suboptimal mental health outcomes may be attributed to the lack of a systematic approach to tracking and measuring patient progress. In psychiatry, Measurement-Based Care (MBC) offers an objective, systematic approach to monitor clinical progress, evaluate treatment efficacy, and inform clinical decisions, yet remains seldom used in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the clinical impact of using MBC in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model as a guideline, this integrative review focused on the research query, \"What is the clinical impact of Measurement-Based Care when treating patients with mental illness?\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of nine articles met the inclusion criteria for this integrative review. The articles ranged from 2008 to 2021. The following themes were identified from the analysis of these articles: (1) the clinical impact of MBC, (2) provider attitudes about MBC, and (3) barriers to MBC implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MBC, augmenting usual standard care, provides an objective, systematic approach using quantifiable data to monitor symptom severity and treatment effectiveness. This review highlights the clinical benefits of MBC, including increased remission rates, lower risk of relapse, improved medication adherence, and strengthening the therapeutic alliance. Although this review provides an overview of the benefits of MBC in psychiatry, there remains a substantial practice gap warranting further investigation. Strategies must be developed to address barriers at the individual and organizational levels which impede the successful adoption of MBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Measurement-Based Care in Psychiatry: An Integrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Janine DeSimone, Bryan R Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10783903231177707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quality of mental health treatment has not progressed to the same extent as physical health treatment. Suboptimal mental health outcomes may be attributed to the lack of a systematic approach to tracking and measuring patient progress. In psychiatry, Measurement-Based Care (MBC) offers an objective, systematic approach to monitor clinical progress, evaluate treatment efficacy, and inform clinical decisions, yet remains seldom used in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the clinical impact of using MBC in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model as a guideline, this integrative review focused on the research query, \\\"What is the clinical impact of Measurement-Based Care when treating patients with mental illness?\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of nine articles met the inclusion criteria for this integrative review. The articles ranged from 2008 to 2021. The following themes were identified from the analysis of these articles: (1) the clinical impact of MBC, (2) provider attitudes about MBC, and (3) barriers to MBC implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MBC, augmenting usual standard care, provides an objective, systematic approach using quantifiable data to monitor symptom severity and treatment effectiveness. This review highlights the clinical benefits of MBC, including increased remission rates, lower risk of relapse, improved medication adherence, and strengthening the therapeutic alliance. Although this review provides an overview of the benefits of MBC in psychiatry, there remains a substantial practice gap warranting further investigation. Strategies must be developed to address barriers at the individual and organizational levels which impede the successful adoption of MBC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903231177707\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903231177707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心理健康治疗的质量并没有像身体健康治疗那样取得长足进步。心理健康治疗效果不佳的原因可能是缺乏系统的方法来跟踪和衡量患者的治疗进展。在精神病学中,基于测量的护理(MBC)提供了一种客观、系统的方法来监测临床进展、评估治疗效果并为临床决策提供依据,但在日常实践中却很少使用:方法:以约翰-霍普金斯护理学循证实践模式为指导,本综合综述重点关注以下研究问题:"在治疗精神疾病患者时,基于测量的护理有哪些临床影响?"结果:共有九篇文章符合本综合综述的纳入标准。这些文章的时间跨度为 2008 年至 2021 年。通过对这些文章的分析,确定了以下主题:(1)MBC 的临床影响,(2)医疗服务提供者对 MBC 的态度,以及(3)实施 MBC 的障碍:MBC 作为常规标准护理的补充,提供了一种客观、系统的方法,使用可量化的数据来监测症状严重程度和治疗效果。本综述强调了 MBC 的临床益处,包括提高缓解率、降低复发风险、改善服药依从性以及加强治疗联盟。尽管本综述概述了 MBC 在精神病学中的益处,但仍存在很大的实践差距,值得进一步研究。必须制定策略,解决个人和组织层面上阻碍成功采用 MBC 的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Measurement-Based Care in Psychiatry: An Integrative Review.

Background: The quality of mental health treatment has not progressed to the same extent as physical health treatment. Suboptimal mental health outcomes may be attributed to the lack of a systematic approach to tracking and measuring patient progress. In psychiatry, Measurement-Based Care (MBC) offers an objective, systematic approach to monitor clinical progress, evaluate treatment efficacy, and inform clinical decisions, yet remains seldom used in daily practice.

Aims: To identify the clinical impact of using MBC in psychiatry.

Methods: Using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model as a guideline, this integrative review focused on the research query, "What is the clinical impact of Measurement-Based Care when treating patients with mental illness?"

Results: A total of nine articles met the inclusion criteria for this integrative review. The articles ranged from 2008 to 2021. The following themes were identified from the analysis of these articles: (1) the clinical impact of MBC, (2) provider attitudes about MBC, and (3) barriers to MBC implementation.

Conclusions: MBC, augmenting usual standard care, provides an objective, systematic approach using quantifiable data to monitor symptom severity and treatment effectiveness. This review highlights the clinical benefits of MBC, including increased remission rates, lower risk of relapse, improved medication adherence, and strengthening the therapeutic alliance. Although this review provides an overview of the benefits of MBC in psychiatry, there remains a substantial practice gap warranting further investigation. Strategies must be developed to address barriers at the individual and organizational levels which impede the successful adoption of MBC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (JAPNA) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal publishing up-to-date information to promote psychiatric nursing, improve mental health care for culturally diverse individuals, families, groups, and communities, as well as shape health care policy for the delivery of mental health services. JAPNA publishes both clinical and research articles relevant to psychiatric nursing. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Identification of Relationships Among Resilience Factors Using Network Analysis: A Pilot Study. Psychiatric Mental Health Nurses' Perceptions and Experiences of Inpatient Mental Health Care Safety Culture in Saudi Arabia. Empathy Amplified: Exploring the Transformative Potential of Understanding Auditory Hallucinations Through Staff Training. Development and Acceptability of Provider Training to Increase Treatment Engagement of Parents in Their Children's Behavioral Health Care Need. Passing the Baton: A Conversation With Outgoing Editor, Dr. Geraldine Pearson.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1