Luciane Kaiser Pinotti, Anderson da Silva Castro, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Garcia, Pedro Henrique Pereira Alvim, Thiago Henrique Roza, Fabiana Antunes Andrade, Pedro André Kowacs, Raffael Massuda
{"title":"偏头痛患者的执行功能:荟萃分析的系统回顾。","authors":"Luciane Kaiser Pinotti, Anderson da Silva Castro, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Garcia, Pedro Henrique Pereira Alvim, Thiago Henrique Roza, Fabiana Antunes Andrade, Pedro André Kowacs, Raffael Massuda","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2022.2149390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction:</i> Migraine, a common neurological disease, is known to impact the quality of life of individuals with this condition.<i>Methods:</i> We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the abnormalities associated with executive functions of migraineurs as compared with healthy controls. In addition, we investigated the differences between patients with and without aura.<i>Results:</i> A total of 25 studies were included in the systematic review and 19 in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models, with the unit of analysis as the standardised mean difference (calculated as Hedges'g). Patients with migraine had worse performance in the trail making test A (g = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.74; <i>p</i> = 0.0271) and B (g = 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.64; <i>p</i> = 0.0026), and digit span backward test (g = -0.20; 95% CI - 0.31, - 0.09; <i>p</i> = 0.0105). Subgroup analysis revealed no difference between migraine with and without aura.<i>Conclusion:</i> These results suggest that migraine patients may present worse performance for specific executive functional domains, including attention, working memory, and mental flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":"28 1","pages":"52-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Executive functions in migraine patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Luciane Kaiser Pinotti, Anderson da Silva Castro, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Garcia, Pedro Henrique Pereira Alvim, Thiago Henrique Roza, Fabiana Antunes Andrade, Pedro André Kowacs, Raffael Massuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13546805.2022.2149390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Introduction:</i> Migraine, a common neurological disease, is known to impact the quality of life of individuals with this condition.<i>Methods:</i> We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the abnormalities associated with executive functions of migraineurs as compared with healthy controls. In addition, we investigated the differences between patients with and without aura.<i>Results:</i> A total of 25 studies were included in the systematic review and 19 in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models, with the unit of analysis as the standardised mean difference (calculated as Hedges'g). Patients with migraine had worse performance in the trail making test A (g = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.74; <i>p</i> = 0.0271) and B (g = 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.64; <i>p</i> = 0.0026), and digit span backward test (g = -0.20; 95% CI - 0.31, - 0.09; <i>p</i> = 0.0105). Subgroup analysis revealed no difference between migraine with and without aura.<i>Conclusion:</i> These results suggest that migraine patients may present worse performance for specific executive functional domains, including attention, working memory, and mental flexibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"52-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2022.2149390\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2022.2149390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Executive functions in migraine patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Introduction: Migraine, a common neurological disease, is known to impact the quality of life of individuals with this condition.Methods: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the abnormalities associated with executive functions of migraineurs as compared with healthy controls. In addition, we investigated the differences between patients with and without aura.Results: A total of 25 studies were included in the systematic review and 19 in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models, with the unit of analysis as the standardised mean difference (calculated as Hedges'g). Patients with migraine had worse performance in the trail making test A (g = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.74; p = 0.0271) and B (g = 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.64; p = 0.0026), and digit span backward test (g = -0.20; 95% CI - 0.31, - 0.09; p = 0.0105). Subgroup analysis revealed no difference between migraine with and without aura.Conclusion: These results suggest that migraine patients may present worse performance for specific executive functional domains, including attention, working memory, and mental flexibility.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered.
There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.