偏头痛患者的执行功能:荟萃分析的系统回顾。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/13546805.2022.2149390
Luciane Kaiser Pinotti, Anderson da Silva Castro, Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Garcia, Pedro Henrique Pereira Alvim, Thiago Henrique Roza, Fabiana Antunes Andrade, Pedro André Kowacs, Raffael Massuda
{"title":"偏头痛患者的执行功能:荟萃分析的系统回顾。","authors":"Luciane Kaiser Pinotti,&nbsp;Anderson da Silva Castro,&nbsp;Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Garcia,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Pereira Alvim,&nbsp;Thiago Henrique Roza,&nbsp;Fabiana Antunes Andrade,&nbsp;Pedro André Kowacs,&nbsp;Raffael Massuda","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2022.2149390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction:</i> Migraine, a common neurological disease, is known to impact the quality of life of individuals with this condition.<i>Methods:</i> We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the abnormalities associated with executive functions of migraineurs as compared with healthy controls. In addition, we investigated the differences between patients with and without aura.<i>Results:</i> A total of 25 studies were included in the systematic review and 19 in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models, with the unit of analysis as the standardised mean difference (calculated as Hedges'g). Patients with migraine had worse performance in the trail making test A (g = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.74; <i>p</i> = 0.0271) and B (g = 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.64; <i>p</i> = 0.0026), and digit span backward test (g = -0.20; 95% CI - 0.31, - 0.09; <i>p</i> = 0.0105). Subgroup analysis revealed no difference between migraine with and without aura.<i>Conclusion:</i> These results suggest that migraine patients may present worse performance for specific executive functional domains, including attention, working memory, and mental flexibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":"28 1","pages":"52-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Executive functions in migraine patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Luciane Kaiser Pinotti,&nbsp;Anderson da Silva Castro,&nbsp;Gabriel Henrique de Oliveira Garcia,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Pereira Alvim,&nbsp;Thiago Henrique Roza,&nbsp;Fabiana Antunes Andrade,&nbsp;Pedro André Kowacs,&nbsp;Raffael Massuda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13546805.2022.2149390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Introduction:</i> Migraine, a common neurological disease, is known to impact the quality of life of individuals with this condition.<i>Methods:</i> We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the abnormalities associated with executive functions of migraineurs as compared with healthy controls. In addition, we investigated the differences between patients with and without aura.<i>Results:</i> A total of 25 studies were included in the systematic review and 19 in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models, with the unit of analysis as the standardised mean difference (calculated as Hedges'g). Patients with migraine had worse performance in the trail making test A (g = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.74; <i>p</i> = 0.0271) and B (g = 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.64; <i>p</i> = 0.0026), and digit span backward test (g = -0.20; 95% CI - 0.31, - 0.09; <i>p</i> = 0.0105). Subgroup analysis revealed no difference between migraine with and without aura.<i>Conclusion:</i> These results suggest that migraine patients may present worse performance for specific executive functional domains, including attention, working memory, and mental flexibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"52-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2022.2149390\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2022.2149390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:偏头痛是一种常见的神经系统疾病,已知会影响患者的生活质量。方法:我们通过荟萃分析对偏头痛患者与健康对照者的执行功能异常进行了系统回顾。此外,我们还调查了有先兆和无先兆患者之间的差异。结果:系统评价共纳入25项研究,荟萃分析纳入19项研究。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,分析单位为标准化平均差(以Hedges’g计算)。偏头痛患者在试验A中的表现较差(g = 0.40;95%置信区间[CI] 0.05 ~ 0.74;p = 0.0271)和B (g = 0.40;95% ci 0.16-0.64;P = 0.0026),数字跨度反向检验(g = -0.20;95% ci - 0.31, - 0.09;p = 0.0105)。亚组分析显示,有先兆和没有先兆的偏头痛之间没有差异。结论:这些结果表明偏头痛患者可能在特定的执行功能领域表现较差,包括注意力、工作记忆和精神灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Executive functions in migraine patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Introduction: Migraine, a common neurological disease, is known to impact the quality of life of individuals with this condition.Methods: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to investigate the abnormalities associated with executive functions of migraineurs as compared with healthy controls. In addition, we investigated the differences between patients with and without aura.Results: A total of 25 studies were included in the systematic review and 19 in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models, with the unit of analysis as the standardised mean difference (calculated as Hedges'g). Patients with migraine had worse performance in the trail making test A (g = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.74; p = 0.0271) and B (g = 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.64; p = 0.0026), and digit span backward test (g = -0.20; 95% CI - 0.31, - 0.09; p = 0.0105). Subgroup analysis revealed no difference between migraine with and without aura.Conclusion: These results suggest that migraine patients may present worse performance for specific executive functional domains, including attention, working memory, and mental flexibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
期刊最新文献
How disrupted interoception could lead to disturbances in perceptual reality monitoring. Can neurocognitive performance account for dimensional paranoid ideation? Conspiracy mentality in autistic and non-autistic individuals Pattern glare sensitivity distinguishes subclinical autism and schizotypy. Limited awareness of hallucinations in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1