基于机构的老年人过渡护理项目的健康相关结果:一项前瞻性队列研究

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian Health Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1071/AH22226
Jo-Aine Hang, Jacqueline Francis-Coad, Angela Jacques, Nicholas Waldron, Kate Purslowe, Anne-Marie Hill
{"title":"基于机构的老年人过渡护理项目的健康相关结果:一项前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Jo-Aine Hang,&nbsp;Jacqueline Francis-Coad,&nbsp;Angela Jacques,&nbsp;Nicholas Waldron,&nbsp;Kate Purslowe,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Hill","doi":"10.1071/AH22226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of transition care programs (TCP) in improving health-related outcomes and discharge destination for older adults. This study aimed to (i) identify changes in health-related outcomes in older adults undergoing a facility-based TCP between admission and discharge; and (ii) compare health-related outcomes between participants discharged home and those discharged to permanent residential care. Method A prospective, observational study was conducted with older adults aged ≥60 years who participated in a facility-based TCP that provided short-term rehabilitation including mobility training, group exercise and cognitive activities. Physical, cognitive and social outcomes were measured at admission and discharge. Data were analysed using linear mixed modelling. Results Of the 41 participants (mean age 80.1 (±8.9) years), 26 (63.4%) were discharged home compared with 14 (34.2%) to residential care. Participants showed statistically significantly improvement in performance of activities of daily living (ADL), mobility and health-related quality of life, with a statistically and clinically significant decline in performance of instrumental ADL. Participants discharged home had statistically and clinically significant greater improvement in mobility compared with those discharged to residential care (de Morton mobility index: home, 13.6 (95% CI: 9.8, 17.4) vs residential, 6.9 (95% CI: 1.7, 12.0), P interaction  = 0.04) and statistically and clinically significant less decline in instrumental ADL (Lawton's scale: home, -0.8 (95% CI: -1.3, -0.2) vs residential, -2.1 (95% CI: -2.9, -1.4), P interaction  = 0.002). Conclusion Older adults participating in a facility-based TCP had improvements in physical, cognitive and social functional abilities. However, those who returned home still had residual mobility deficits and decreased performance of instrumental ADL when compared with normative community level recommendations, which could impact on longer term community living. Further research investigating which program service components could be modified to further improve rehabilitation outcomes could benefit older adults in returning and remaining at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":"47 3","pages":"322-330"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health-related outcomes of a facility-based transition care program for older adults: a prospective cohort study<a href=\\\"#afn1\\\"><sup>†</sup></a>.\",\"authors\":\"Jo-Aine Hang,&nbsp;Jacqueline Francis-Coad,&nbsp;Angela Jacques,&nbsp;Nicholas Waldron,&nbsp;Kate Purslowe,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH22226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of transition care programs (TCP) in improving health-related outcomes and discharge destination for older adults. This study aimed to (i) identify changes in health-related outcomes in older adults undergoing a facility-based TCP between admission and discharge; and (ii) compare health-related outcomes between participants discharged home and those discharged to permanent residential care. Method A prospective, observational study was conducted with older adults aged ≥60 years who participated in a facility-based TCP that provided short-term rehabilitation including mobility training, group exercise and cognitive activities. Physical, cognitive and social outcomes were measured at admission and discharge. Data were analysed using linear mixed modelling. Results Of the 41 participants (mean age 80.1 (±8.9) years), 26 (63.4%) were discharged home compared with 14 (34.2%) to residential care. Participants showed statistically significantly improvement in performance of activities of daily living (ADL), mobility and health-related quality of life, with a statistically and clinically significant decline in performance of instrumental ADL. Participants discharged home had statistically and clinically significant greater improvement in mobility compared with those discharged to residential care (de Morton mobility index: home, 13.6 (95% CI: 9.8, 17.4) vs residential, 6.9 (95% CI: 1.7, 12.0), P interaction  = 0.04) and statistically and clinically significant less decline in instrumental ADL (Lawton's scale: home, -0.8 (95% CI: -1.3, -0.2) vs residential, -2.1 (95% CI: -2.9, -1.4), P interaction  = 0.002). Conclusion Older adults participating in a facility-based TCP had improvements in physical, cognitive and social functional abilities. However, those who returned home still had residual mobility deficits and decreased performance of instrumental ADL when compared with normative community level recommendations, which could impact on longer term community living. Further research investigating which program service components could be modified to further improve rehabilitation outcomes could benefit older adults in returning and remaining at home.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"322-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于过渡护理计划(TCP)在改善老年人健康相关结局和出院目的地方面的有效性,证据有限。本研究旨在(i)确定入院和出院期间接受基于医院的TCP治疗的老年人健康相关结果的变化;(ii)比较出院回家的参与者和出院到永久住院护理的参与者之间的健康相关结果。方法对≥60岁的老年人进行前瞻性观察性研究,这些老年人参加了以设施为基础的TCP,提供短期康复训练,包括活动能力训练、团体运动和认知活动。在入院和出院时测量身体、认知和社会结果。数据分析采用线性混合模型。结果41例患者(平均年龄80.1(±8.9)岁)中,26例(63.4%)出院回家,14例(34.2%)住院。参与者在日常生活活动(ADL)、机动性和与健康相关的生活质量方面表现出统计学上显著的改善,而在工具性ADL方面表现出统计学上和临床上显著的下降。出院回家的参与者在活动能力方面的改善在统计学上和临床上都具有显著意义(de Morton活动能力指数:家,13.6 (95% CI: 9.8, 17.4) vs住,6.9 (95% CI: 1.7, 12.0), P交互作用= 0.04),工具ADL的下降在统计学和临床上都具有显著意义(劳顿量表:家,-0.8 (95% CI: -1.3, -0.2) vs住,-2.1 (95% CI: -2.9, -1.4), P交互作用= 0.002)。结论老年人参加以设施为基础的TCP,在身体、认知和社会功能能力方面均有改善。然而,与规范的社区水平建议相比,那些回家的人仍然存在剩余的活动能力缺陷和工具性ADL的表现下降,这可能会影响长期的社区生活。进一步的研究调查哪些项目服务组件可以被修改以进一步改善康复结果,这可能有利于老年人返回并留在家中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health-related outcomes of a facility-based transition care program for older adults: a prospective cohort study.

Objectives There is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of transition care programs (TCP) in improving health-related outcomes and discharge destination for older adults. This study aimed to (i) identify changes in health-related outcomes in older adults undergoing a facility-based TCP between admission and discharge; and (ii) compare health-related outcomes between participants discharged home and those discharged to permanent residential care. Method A prospective, observational study was conducted with older adults aged ≥60 years who participated in a facility-based TCP that provided short-term rehabilitation including mobility training, group exercise and cognitive activities. Physical, cognitive and social outcomes were measured at admission and discharge. Data were analysed using linear mixed modelling. Results Of the 41 participants (mean age 80.1 (±8.9) years), 26 (63.4%) were discharged home compared with 14 (34.2%) to residential care. Participants showed statistically significantly improvement in performance of activities of daily living (ADL), mobility and health-related quality of life, with a statistically and clinically significant decline in performance of instrumental ADL. Participants discharged home had statistically and clinically significant greater improvement in mobility compared with those discharged to residential care (de Morton mobility index: home, 13.6 (95% CI: 9.8, 17.4) vs residential, 6.9 (95% CI: 1.7, 12.0), P interaction  = 0.04) and statistically and clinically significant less decline in instrumental ADL (Lawton's scale: home, -0.8 (95% CI: -1.3, -0.2) vs residential, -2.1 (95% CI: -2.9, -1.4), P interaction  = 0.002). Conclusion Older adults participating in a facility-based TCP had improvements in physical, cognitive and social functional abilities. However, those who returned home still had residual mobility deficits and decreased performance of instrumental ADL when compared with normative community level recommendations, which could impact on longer term community living. Further research investigating which program service components could be modified to further improve rehabilitation outcomes could benefit older adults in returning and remaining at home.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of physiotherapy-led lung ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Clinical governance implications of a Victorian coronial finding regarding contrast-related anaphylaxis for health services and private providers of radiology services. Implementation of an in-reach rehabilitation program can increase the rate of discharge home from acute hospital care. Establishment of the first Australian public and health-professional palliative care advice service: exploring caller needs and gaps in care. Evaluating an implementation of the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1