在澳大利亚的医院和养老院,我们如何培训护理人员和直接护理人员帮助病人和居民移动?一项全国性调查。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian Health Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1071/AH22296
Natasha Brusco, Terry Haines, Nicholas F Taylor, Helen Rawson, Leanne Boyd, Christina Ekegren, Helen Kugler, Helen Dawes, Camilla Radia-George, Christine Graven, Keith Hill
{"title":"在澳大利亚的医院和养老院,我们如何培训护理人员和直接护理人员帮助病人和居民移动?一项全国性调查。","authors":"Natasha Brusco,&nbsp;Terry Haines,&nbsp;Nicholas F Taylor,&nbsp;Helen Rawson,&nbsp;Leanne Boyd,&nbsp;Christina Ekegren,&nbsp;Helen Kugler,&nbsp;Helen Dawes,&nbsp;Camilla Radia-George,&nbsp;Christine Graven,&nbsp;Keith Hill","doi":"10.1071/AH22296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Nursing workplace injuries related to staff-assisted patient/resident movement occur frequently, however, little is known about the programs that aim to prevent these injuries. The objectives of this study were to: (i) describe how Australian hospitals and residential aged care services provide manual handling training to staff and the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on training; (ii) report issues relating to manual handling; (iii) explore the inclusion of dynamic risk assessment; and (iv) describe the barriers and potential improvements. Method Using a cross-sectional design, an online 20-min survey was distributed by email, social media, and snowballing to Australian hospitals and residential aged care services. Results Respondents were from 75 services across Australia, with a combined 73 000 staff who assist patients/residents to mobilise. Most services provide staff manual handling training on commencement (85%; n  = 63/74), then annually (88% n  = 65/74). Since the COVID-19 pandemic, training was less frequent, shorter in duration, and with greater online content. Respondents reported issues with staff injuries (63% n  = 41), patient/resident falls (52% n  = 34), and patient/resident inactivity (69% n  = 45). Dynamic risk assessment was missing in part or in whole from most programs (92% n  = 67/73), despite a belief that this may reduce staff injuries (93% n  = 68/73), patient/resident falls (81% n  = 59/73) and inactivity (92% n  = 67/73). Barriers included insufficient staff and time, and improvements included giving residents a say in how they move and greater access to allied health. Conclusion Most Australian health and aged care services provide clinical staff with regular manual handling training for staff-assisted patient/resident movement, however, issues with staff injuries, as well as patient/resident falls and inactivity, remain. While there was a belief that dynamic in-the-moment risk assessment during staff-assisted patient/resident movement may improve staff and resident/patient safety, it was missing from most manual handling programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":"47 3","pages":"331-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Australian hospitals and residential aged care facilities, how do we train nursing and direct care staff to assist patients and residents to move? A national survey.\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Brusco,&nbsp;Terry Haines,&nbsp;Nicholas F Taylor,&nbsp;Helen Rawson,&nbsp;Leanne Boyd,&nbsp;Christina Ekegren,&nbsp;Helen Kugler,&nbsp;Helen Dawes,&nbsp;Camilla Radia-George,&nbsp;Christine Graven,&nbsp;Keith Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH22296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective Nursing workplace injuries related to staff-assisted patient/resident movement occur frequently, however, little is known about the programs that aim to prevent these injuries. The objectives of this study were to: (i) describe how Australian hospitals and residential aged care services provide manual handling training to staff and the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on training; (ii) report issues relating to manual handling; (iii) explore the inclusion of dynamic risk assessment; and (iv) describe the barriers and potential improvements. Method Using a cross-sectional design, an online 20-min survey was distributed by email, social media, and snowballing to Australian hospitals and residential aged care services. Results Respondents were from 75 services across Australia, with a combined 73 000 staff who assist patients/residents to mobilise. Most services provide staff manual handling training on commencement (85%; n  = 63/74), then annually (88% n  = 65/74). Since the COVID-19 pandemic, training was less frequent, shorter in duration, and with greater online content. Respondents reported issues with staff injuries (63% n  = 41), patient/resident falls (52% n  = 34), and patient/resident inactivity (69% n  = 45). Dynamic risk assessment was missing in part or in whole from most programs (92% n  = 67/73), despite a belief that this may reduce staff injuries (93% n  = 68/73), patient/resident falls (81% n  = 59/73) and inactivity (92% n  = 67/73). Barriers included insufficient staff and time, and improvements included giving residents a say in how they move and greater access to allied health. Conclusion Most Australian health and aged care services provide clinical staff with regular manual handling training for staff-assisted patient/resident movement, however, issues with staff injuries, as well as patient/resident falls and inactivity, remain. While there was a belief that dynamic in-the-moment risk assessment during staff-assisted patient/resident movement may improve staff and resident/patient safety, it was missing from most manual handling programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"331-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22296\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的护理工作场所伤害相关的工作人员协助病人/居民的运动经常发生,然而,很少知道的方案,旨在防止这些伤害。本研究的目的是:(i)描述澳大利亚医院和住宅老年护理服务如何为员工提供手动操作培训,以及2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对培训的影响;(ii)报告与人工处理有关的问题;(iii)探索纳入动态风险评估;(iv)描述障碍和潜在的改进。方法采用横断面设计,通过电子邮件、社交媒体和滚雪球的方式向澳大利亚的医院和养老院进行20分钟的在线调查。结果受访者来自澳大利亚各地的75个服务机构,共有73,000名工作人员协助患者/居民动员。大多数服务在开始工作时为员工提供手工操作培训(85%;N = 63/74),然后每年(88% N = 65/74)。自2019冠状病毒病大流行以来,培训频率降低,持续时间缩短,在线内容增加。受访者报告了工作人员受伤(63% n = 41)、患者/住院医师跌倒(52% n = 34)以及患者/住院医师不活动(69% n = 45)等问题。大多数项目部分或全部缺少动态风险评估(92% n = 67/73),尽管人们认为这可能会减少工作人员受伤(93% n = 68/73)、患者/住院医师跌倒(81% n = 59/73)和不活动(92% n = 67/73)。障碍包括工作人员和时间不足,改善措施包括让居民对自己的出行方式有发言权,并让他们更容易获得联合医疗服务。大多数澳大利亚保健和老年护理服务机构为临床工作人员提供工作人员协助病人/居民移动的定期手工操作培训,然而,工作人员受伤以及病人/居民跌倒和不活动的问题仍然存在。虽然有一种观点认为,在工作人员协助的病人/住院医生移动过程中,动态的即时风险评估可能会提高工作人员和住院医生/病人的安全,但大多数人工处理程序都缺少这种评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In Australian hospitals and residential aged care facilities, how do we train nursing and direct care staff to assist patients and residents to move? A national survey.

Objective Nursing workplace injuries related to staff-assisted patient/resident movement occur frequently, however, little is known about the programs that aim to prevent these injuries. The objectives of this study were to: (i) describe how Australian hospitals and residential aged care services provide manual handling training to staff and the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on training; (ii) report issues relating to manual handling; (iii) explore the inclusion of dynamic risk assessment; and (iv) describe the barriers and potential improvements. Method Using a cross-sectional design, an online 20-min survey was distributed by email, social media, and snowballing to Australian hospitals and residential aged care services. Results Respondents were from 75 services across Australia, with a combined 73 000 staff who assist patients/residents to mobilise. Most services provide staff manual handling training on commencement (85%; n  = 63/74), then annually (88% n  = 65/74). Since the COVID-19 pandemic, training was less frequent, shorter in duration, and with greater online content. Respondents reported issues with staff injuries (63% n  = 41), patient/resident falls (52% n  = 34), and patient/resident inactivity (69% n  = 45). Dynamic risk assessment was missing in part or in whole from most programs (92% n  = 67/73), despite a belief that this may reduce staff injuries (93% n  = 68/73), patient/resident falls (81% n  = 59/73) and inactivity (92% n  = 67/73). Barriers included insufficient staff and time, and improvements included giving residents a say in how they move and greater access to allied health. Conclusion Most Australian health and aged care services provide clinical staff with regular manual handling training for staff-assisted patient/resident movement, however, issues with staff injuries, as well as patient/resident falls and inactivity, remain. While there was a belief that dynamic in-the-moment risk assessment during staff-assisted patient/resident movement may improve staff and resident/patient safety, it was missing from most manual handling programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of physiotherapy-led lung ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Clinical governance implications of a Victorian coronial finding regarding contrast-related anaphylaxis for health services and private providers of radiology services. Implementation of an in-reach rehabilitation program can increase the rate of discharge home from acute hospital care. Establishment of the first Australian public and health-professional palliative care advice service: exploring caller needs and gaps in care. Evaluating an implementation of the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1