中国教育与幸福的关系。

IF 1.1 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Social and Economic Development Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-15 DOI:10.1007/s40847-022-00193-1
Sijia Liu, Almas Heshmati
{"title":"中国教育与幸福的关系。","authors":"Sijia Liu,&nbsp;Almas Heshmati","doi":"10.1007/s40847-022-00193-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Well-being is often quantitatively measured based on individuals' income or health situation but the relationship between education and well-being has not been fully investigated. It is also important to compare well-being using different individual characteristics especially gender. This paper analyzes well-being using a unique dataset from the Chinese General Social Surveys in 2012, 2013, and 2015. Two measures of well-being are used: self-assessed unidimensional subjective well-being and parametrically estimated multidimensional objective well-being. Objective well-being is a composite parametric index with contributions from different domains of education influenced by identity, capability, and material well-being. These help in understanding the differences between and compare subjective and objective well-being. The results of our descriptive and regression analysis suggests that the multidimensional well-being index differs from subjective well-being in ranking individuals grouped by important common characteristics. These differences are captured by our study which helps to broaden the measurement and analysis of the multidimensionality of the well-being index. Education influences well-being positively, conditional on controlling for identity, capability, material and marital status, and Confucianism. Investments in education and female empowerment which target well-being measures will help reduce the dimensionality of the gender gap in rural China, in particular those attributed to Confucianism.</p>","PeriodicalId":29818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Economic Development","volume":"25 1","pages":"123-151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between education and well-being in China.\",\"authors\":\"Sijia Liu,&nbsp;Almas Heshmati\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40847-022-00193-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Well-being is often quantitatively measured based on individuals' income or health situation but the relationship between education and well-being has not been fully investigated. It is also important to compare well-being using different individual characteristics especially gender. This paper analyzes well-being using a unique dataset from the Chinese General Social Surveys in 2012, 2013, and 2015. Two measures of well-being are used: self-assessed unidimensional subjective well-being and parametrically estimated multidimensional objective well-being. Objective well-being is a composite parametric index with contributions from different domains of education influenced by identity, capability, and material well-being. These help in understanding the differences between and compare subjective and objective well-being. The results of our descriptive and regression analysis suggests that the multidimensional well-being index differs from subjective well-being in ranking individuals grouped by important common characteristics. These differences are captured by our study which helps to broaden the measurement and analysis of the multidimensionality of the well-being index. Education influences well-being positively, conditional on controlling for identity, capability, material and marital status, and Confucianism. Investments in education and female empowerment which target well-being measures will help reduce the dimensionality of the gender gap in rural China, in particular those attributed to Confucianism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social and Economic Development\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"123-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9477166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social and Economic Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-022-00193-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Economic Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-022-00193-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

幸福感通常是根据个人收入或健康状况来定量衡量的,但教育与幸福感之间的关系尚未得到充分调查。同样重要的是,使用不同的个人特征,特别是性别来比较幸福感。本文使用2012年、2013年和2015年中国一般社会调查的一个独特数据集分析了幸福感。幸福感有两种衡量标准:自我评估的一维主观幸福感和参数估计的多维客观幸福感。目标幸福感是一个综合参数指数,不同教育领域的贡献受到身份、能力和物质幸福感的影响。这些有助于理解主观幸福感和客观幸福感之间的差异并进行比较。我们的描述性和回归分析结果表明,多维幸福感指数在按重要共同特征分组的个人排名方面与主观幸福感不同。我们的研究捕捉到了这些差异,这有助于拓宽幸福指数多维性的测量和分析范围。教育对幸福感有积极影响,条件是对身份、能力、物质和婚姻状况以及儒家思想的控制。以福利措施为目标的教育和女性赋权投资将有助于缩小中国农村的性别差距,尤其是儒家思想造成的性别差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship between education and well-being in China.

Well-being is often quantitatively measured based on individuals' income or health situation but the relationship between education and well-being has not been fully investigated. It is also important to compare well-being using different individual characteristics especially gender. This paper analyzes well-being using a unique dataset from the Chinese General Social Surveys in 2012, 2013, and 2015. Two measures of well-being are used: self-assessed unidimensional subjective well-being and parametrically estimated multidimensional objective well-being. Objective well-being is a composite parametric index with contributions from different domains of education influenced by identity, capability, and material well-being. These help in understanding the differences between and compare subjective and objective well-being. The results of our descriptive and regression analysis suggests that the multidimensional well-being index differs from subjective well-being in ranking individuals grouped by important common characteristics. These differences are captured by our study which helps to broaden the measurement and analysis of the multidimensionality of the well-being index. Education influences well-being positively, conditional on controlling for identity, capability, material and marital status, and Confucianism. Investments in education and female empowerment which target well-being measures will help reduce the dimensionality of the gender gap in rural China, in particular those attributed to Confucianism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Welfare shocks, coping strategies and safety nets: a study on rural households of Cachar District, Assam Understanding a wounded civilisation: a sociological reading of V. S. Naipaul’s Indian trilogy Higher-order risk preferences and livelihood choices of farmers from West Bengal, India Gender gap in poverty biased by caste in India: an empirical analysis Public debt, tax and economic growth in Sub-Saharan African countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1