一种新型数字自杀预防运动挑战感知负担的安全性、可接受性和初始有效性。

Marianne Webb, Elise R Carrotte, Anna Flego, Bonnie Vincent, Benjamin Lee-Bates, Jack Heath, Michelle Blanchard
{"title":"一种新型数字自杀预防运动挑战感知负担的安全性、可接受性和初始有效性。","authors":"Marianne Webb,&nbsp;Elise R Carrotte,&nbsp;Anna Flego,&nbsp;Bonnie Vincent,&nbsp;Benjamin Lee-Bates,&nbsp;Jack Heath,&nbsp;Michelle Blanchard","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> <i>Better Off With You</i> is a peer-to-peer, digital suicide prevention campaign pilot designed to challenge the idea of perceived burdensomeness; the schema experienced by many people contemplating suicide that they are a burden on others. <i>Aims:</i> To investigate the safety, acceptability, and initial effectiveness of the campaign. <i>Method:</i> This mixed methods pilot involved a general community sample (<i>N</i> = 157), from targeted sites within two Australian communities. Data were collected at baseline and after 1-week exposure to the campaign videos and website. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of participants (<i>N</i> = 15). <i>Results:</i> Participants rated the campaign as highly engaging and relevant to local communities. In interviews, participants identified the campaign as being unique, safe, and impactful. Overall, exposure to <i>Better Off With You</i> did not result in any notable changes in perceived burdensomeness, psychological distress, or help-seeking. <i>Limitations:</i> The pilot involved a community sample. As such, outcome measurement scores were low at baseline. <i>Conclusion:</i> This pilot provides new insights about the safety, engagement and initial effectiveness of the <i>Better Off With You</i> campaign. Future research is needed to explore its impact on people experiencing suicidal ideation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"44 3","pages":"189-197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety, Acceptability, and Initial Effectiveness of a Novel Digital Suicide Prevention Campaign Challenging Perceived Burdensomeness.\",\"authors\":\"Marianne Webb,&nbsp;Elise R Carrotte,&nbsp;Anna Flego,&nbsp;Bonnie Vincent,&nbsp;Benjamin Lee-Bates,&nbsp;Jack Heath,&nbsp;Michelle Blanchard\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/0227-5910/a000840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> <i>Better Off With You</i> is a peer-to-peer, digital suicide prevention campaign pilot designed to challenge the idea of perceived burdensomeness; the schema experienced by many people contemplating suicide that they are a burden on others. <i>Aims:</i> To investigate the safety, acceptability, and initial effectiveness of the campaign. <i>Method:</i> This mixed methods pilot involved a general community sample (<i>N</i> = 157), from targeted sites within two Australian communities. Data were collected at baseline and after 1-week exposure to the campaign videos and website. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of participants (<i>N</i> = 15). <i>Results:</i> Participants rated the campaign as highly engaging and relevant to local communities. In interviews, participants identified the campaign as being unique, safe, and impactful. Overall, exposure to <i>Better Off With You</i> did not result in any notable changes in perceived burdensomeness, psychological distress, or help-seeking. <i>Limitations:</i> The pilot involved a community sample. As such, outcome measurement scores were low at baseline. <i>Conclusion:</i> This pilot provides new insights about the safety, engagement and initial effectiveness of the <i>Better Off With You</i> campaign. Future research is needed to explore its impact on people experiencing suicidal ideation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"189-197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000840\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:Better Off With You是一个点对点的数字自杀预防运动试点项目,旨在挑战人们认为自己是负担的想法;很多想要自杀的人都有这样的想法,他们认为自己是别人的负担。目的:调查该活动的安全性、可接受性和初步有效性。方法:这个混合方法试点涉及一个普通社区样本(N = 157),来自两个澳大利亚社区的目标地点。数据收集在基线和1周后的活动视频和网站曝光。对一部分参与者(N = 15)进行了定性访谈。结果:参与者对该活动的评价是高度参与和与当地社区相关。在采访中,参与者认为该活动是独特的、安全的、有影响力的。总的来说,接触《与你一起过得更好》并没有导致感知负担、心理困扰或寻求帮助方面的任何显著变化。局限性:该试点涉及一个社区样本。因此,结果测量得分在基线时较低。结论:该试点项目提供了关于Better Off With You活动的安全性、参与性和初始有效性的新见解。未来的研究需要探索它对经历自杀意念的人的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety, Acceptability, and Initial Effectiveness of a Novel Digital Suicide Prevention Campaign Challenging Perceived Burdensomeness.

Background: Better Off With You is a peer-to-peer, digital suicide prevention campaign pilot designed to challenge the idea of perceived burdensomeness; the schema experienced by many people contemplating suicide that they are a burden on others. Aims: To investigate the safety, acceptability, and initial effectiveness of the campaign. Method: This mixed methods pilot involved a general community sample (N = 157), from targeted sites within two Australian communities. Data were collected at baseline and after 1-week exposure to the campaign videos and website. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of participants (N = 15). Results: Participants rated the campaign as highly engaging and relevant to local communities. In interviews, participants identified the campaign as being unique, safe, and impactful. Overall, exposure to Better Off With You did not result in any notable changes in perceived burdensomeness, psychological distress, or help-seeking. Limitations: The pilot involved a community sample. As such, outcome measurement scores were low at baseline. Conclusion: This pilot provides new insights about the safety, engagement and initial effectiveness of the Better Off With You campaign. Future research is needed to explore its impact on people experiencing suicidal ideation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
期刊最新文献
Perceived Effectiveness of Components of Interventions to Support People Bereaved By Suicide. Exploring the Influence of Masculine Norms on Suicidal Ideation and Help-Seeking Behavior. Substitution of Methods in Suicide Deaths - Firearm Injury and Hanging. Using Real-Time Coronial Data to Detect Spatiotemporal Suicide Clusters. Does Gender Predict Research Productivity? The Case of Prolific Suicidologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1