口面部体感输入对言语感知和言语表达能力的影响之间的相关性。

Auditory perception & cognition Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-12 DOI:10.1080/25742442.2022.2134674
Monica Ashokumar, Clément Guichet, Jean-Luc Schwartz, Takayuki Ito
{"title":"口面部体感输入对言语感知和言语表达能力的影响之间的相关性。","authors":"Monica Ashokumar, Clément Guichet, Jean-Luc Schwartz, Takayuki Ito","doi":"10.1080/25742442.2022.2134674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orofacial somatosensory inputs modify the perception of speech sounds. Such auditory-somatosensory integration likely develops alongside speech production acquisition. We examined whether the somatosensory effect in speech perception varies depending on individual characteristics of speech production.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The somatosensory effect in speech perception was assessed by changes in category boundary between /e/ and /ø/ in a vowel identification test resulting from somatosensory stimulation providing facial skin deformation in the rearward direction corresponding to articulatory movement for /e/ applied together with the auditory input. Speech production performance was quantified by the acoustic distances between the average first, second and third formants of /e/ and /ø/ utterances recorded in a separate test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The category boundary between /e/ and /ø/ was significantly shifted towards /ø/ due to the somatosensory stimulation which is consistent with previous research. The amplitude of the category boundary shift was significantly correlated with the acoustic distance between the mean second - and marginally third - formants of /e/ and /ø/ productions, with no correlation with the first formant distance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Greater acoustic distances can be related to larger contrasts between the articulatory targets of vowels in speech production. These results suggest that the somatosensory effect in speech perception can be linked to speech production performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":72332,"journal":{"name":"Auditory perception & cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between the effect of orofacial somatosensory inputs in speech perception and speech production performance.\",\"authors\":\"Monica Ashokumar, Clément Guichet, Jean-Luc Schwartz, Takayuki Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/25742442.2022.2134674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orofacial somatosensory inputs modify the perception of speech sounds. Such auditory-somatosensory integration likely develops alongside speech production acquisition. We examined whether the somatosensory effect in speech perception varies depending on individual characteristics of speech production.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The somatosensory effect in speech perception was assessed by changes in category boundary between /e/ and /ø/ in a vowel identification test resulting from somatosensory stimulation providing facial skin deformation in the rearward direction corresponding to articulatory movement for /e/ applied together with the auditory input. Speech production performance was quantified by the acoustic distances between the average first, second and third formants of /e/ and /ø/ utterances recorded in a separate test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The category boundary between /e/ and /ø/ was significantly shifted towards /ø/ due to the somatosensory stimulation which is consistent with previous research. The amplitude of the category boundary shift was significantly correlated with the acoustic distance between the mean second - and marginally third - formants of /e/ and /ø/ productions, with no correlation with the first formant distance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Greater acoustic distances can be related to larger contrasts between the articulatory targets of vowels in speech production. These results suggest that the somatosensory effect in speech perception can be linked to speech production performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auditory perception & cognition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auditory perception & cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2022.2134674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory perception & cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25742442.2022.2134674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介口面部体感输入会改变对语音的感知。这种听觉-躯体感觉的整合很可能与语音生成的习得同时发展。我们研究了言语感知中的体感效应是否会因言语生成的个体特征而变化:语音感知中的体感效应通过元音识别测试中/e/和/ø/之间类别界限的变化进行评估,这种变化是在听觉输入的同时提供面部皮肤向后方向的形变,与/e/的发音运动相对应。在一个单独的测试中,通过记录/e/和/ø/语音的平均第一、第二和第三声母之间的声学距离来量化语音生成表现:结果:在体感刺激下,/e/和/ø/之间的类别边界明显向/ø/移动,这与之前的研究结果一致。类别边界偏移的幅度与/e/和/ø/发音的平均第二声母(以及少量第三声母)之间的声学距离明显相关,而与第一声母距离没有相关性:讨论:更大的声学距离可能与语音产生中元音发音目标之间更大的对比度有关。这些结果表明,言语感知中的体感效应与言语生成表现有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation between the effect of orofacial somatosensory inputs in speech perception and speech production performance.

Introduction: Orofacial somatosensory inputs modify the perception of speech sounds. Such auditory-somatosensory integration likely develops alongside speech production acquisition. We examined whether the somatosensory effect in speech perception varies depending on individual characteristics of speech production.

Methods: The somatosensory effect in speech perception was assessed by changes in category boundary between /e/ and /ø/ in a vowel identification test resulting from somatosensory stimulation providing facial skin deformation in the rearward direction corresponding to articulatory movement for /e/ applied together with the auditory input. Speech production performance was quantified by the acoustic distances between the average first, second and third formants of /e/ and /ø/ utterances recorded in a separate test.

Results: The category boundary between /e/ and /ø/ was significantly shifted towards /ø/ due to the somatosensory stimulation which is consistent with previous research. The amplitude of the category boundary shift was significantly correlated with the acoustic distance between the mean second - and marginally third - formants of /e/ and /ø/ productions, with no correlation with the first formant distance.

Discussion: Greater acoustic distances can be related to larger contrasts between the articulatory targets of vowels in speech production. These results suggest that the somatosensory effect in speech perception can be linked to speech production performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of talker and accent variability on rapid adaptation and generalization to non-native accented speech in younger and older adults. Psychophysiological Markers of Auditory Distraction: A Scoping Review Temporal Summation for Noise Stimuli Neural Responses to Repeated Noise Structure in Sounds Are Invariant to Temporal Interruptions Correlation between the effect of orofacial somatosensory inputs in speech perception and speech production performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1