作为减少不专业行为的职业问责文化变革项目的一部分,同行信使的经验:一项横跨八家医院的横断面研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian Health Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1071/AH22191
Ryan D McMullan, Rachel Urwin, Neroli Sunderland, Kate Churruca, Neil Cunningham, Johanna Westbrook
{"title":"作为减少不专业行为的职业问责文化变革项目的一部分,同行信使的经验:一项横跨八家医院的横断面研究。","authors":"Ryan D McMullan,&nbsp;Rachel Urwin,&nbsp;Neroli Sunderland,&nbsp;Kate Churruca,&nbsp;Neil Cunningham,&nbsp;Johanna Westbrook","doi":"10.1071/AH22191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Professional accountability programs are designed to promote professional behaviours between co-workers and improve organisational culture. Peer messengers play a key role in professional accountability programs by providing informal feedback to hospital staff about their behaviour. Little is known about the experiences of messengers. This study examined the experiences of staff who delivered messages to peers as part of a whole-of-hospital professional accountability program called 'Ethos'. Methods Ethos messengers (EMs) across eight Australian hospitals were invited to complete an online survey. The survey consisted of 17 close-ended questions asking respondents about their experiences delivering messages to peers and their perceptions of the Ethos program. Four open-ended questions asked respondents about rewarding and challenging aspects of being a peer messenger and what they would change about the program. Results Sixty EMs provided responses to the survey (response rate, 41.4%). The majority were from nursing and medical groups (53.4%) and had delivered 1-5 messages to staff (57.7%). Time as an EM ranged from less than 3 months to more than 12 months. A majority had been an EM for more than 12 months (80%; n  = 40). Most agreed they had received sufficient training for the role (90.1%; n  = 48) and had the skills (90.1%; n  = 48), access to support (84.9%; n  = 45) and time to fulfil their responsibilities (70.0%; n  = 30). Approximately a third (34.9%; n  = 15) of respondents indicated that recipients were 'sometimes' or 'never' receptive to messages. Challenging aspects of the role included organising a time to talk with staff, delivering feedback effectively and communicating with peers who lacked insight and were unable to reflect on their behaviour. Conclusions Skills development for peer messengers is key to ensuring the effectiveness and sustainability of professional accountability programs. Training in how to deliver difficult information and respond to negative reactions to feedback was identified by EMs as essential to support their ongoing effectiveness in their role.</p>","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":"47 3","pages":"346-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of peer messengers as part of a professional accountability culture change program to reduce unprofessional behaviour: a cross-sectional study across eight hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan D McMullan,&nbsp;Rachel Urwin,&nbsp;Neroli Sunderland,&nbsp;Kate Churruca,&nbsp;Neil Cunningham,&nbsp;Johanna Westbrook\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH22191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective Professional accountability programs are designed to promote professional behaviours between co-workers and improve organisational culture. Peer messengers play a key role in professional accountability programs by providing informal feedback to hospital staff about their behaviour. Little is known about the experiences of messengers. This study examined the experiences of staff who delivered messages to peers as part of a whole-of-hospital professional accountability program called 'Ethos'. Methods Ethos messengers (EMs) across eight Australian hospitals were invited to complete an online survey. The survey consisted of 17 close-ended questions asking respondents about their experiences delivering messages to peers and their perceptions of the Ethos program. Four open-ended questions asked respondents about rewarding and challenging aspects of being a peer messenger and what they would change about the program. Results Sixty EMs provided responses to the survey (response rate, 41.4%). The majority were from nursing and medical groups (53.4%) and had delivered 1-5 messages to staff (57.7%). Time as an EM ranged from less than 3 months to more than 12 months. A majority had been an EM for more than 12 months (80%; n  = 40). Most agreed they had received sufficient training for the role (90.1%; n  = 48) and had the skills (90.1%; n  = 48), access to support (84.9%; n  = 45) and time to fulfil their responsibilities (70.0%; n  = 30). Approximately a third (34.9%; n  = 15) of respondents indicated that recipients were 'sometimes' or 'never' receptive to messages. Challenging aspects of the role included organising a time to talk with staff, delivering feedback effectively and communicating with peers who lacked insight and were unable to reflect on their behaviour. Conclusions Skills development for peer messengers is key to ensuring the effectiveness and sustainability of professional accountability programs. Training in how to deliver difficult information and respond to negative reactions to feedback was identified by EMs as essential to support their ongoing effectiveness in their role.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"346-353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22191\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH22191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

专业问责计划旨在促进同事之间的专业行为,改善组织文化。同行信使通过向医院工作人员提供关于其行为的非正式反馈,在专业问责方案中发挥关键作用。人们对信使的经历知之甚少。这项研究调查了作为全院专业问责项目“Ethos”的一部分,向同行传递信息的工作人员的经历。方法邀请澳大利亚八家医院的Ethos信使(EMs)完成一项在线调查。该调查包括17个封闭式问题,询问受访者向同龄人传递信息的经历,以及他们对Ethos项目的看法。四个开放式问题询问受访者作为同行信使的回报和挑战方面,以及他们希望改变该计划的哪些方面。结果有60家医院对调查进行了反馈,回复率为41.4%。大多数来自护理和医疗组(53.4%),向工作人员传递了1-5条信息(57.7%)。作为EM的时间从少于3个月到超过12个月不等。大多数人已经成为新兴市场超过12个月(80%;N = 40)。大多数人认为他们已经接受了足够的培训(90.1%;N = 48),有技能(90.1%;N = 48),获得支持(84.9%;N = 45)和履行职责的时间(70.0%;N = 30)。大约三分之一(34.9%;N = 15)的受访者表示,收件人“有时”或“从不”接受信息。这个角色具有挑战性的方面包括安排时间与员工交谈,有效地提供反馈,以及与缺乏洞察力、无法反思自己行为的同事沟通。同行信使的技能发展是确保专业问责计划有效性和可持续性的关键。新兴市场认为,培训如何提供困难的信息和应对对反馈的负面反应是支持其持续有效发挥作用的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences of peer messengers as part of a professional accountability culture change program to reduce unprofessional behaviour: a cross-sectional study across eight hospitals.

Objective Professional accountability programs are designed to promote professional behaviours between co-workers and improve organisational culture. Peer messengers play a key role in professional accountability programs by providing informal feedback to hospital staff about their behaviour. Little is known about the experiences of messengers. This study examined the experiences of staff who delivered messages to peers as part of a whole-of-hospital professional accountability program called 'Ethos'. Methods Ethos messengers (EMs) across eight Australian hospitals were invited to complete an online survey. The survey consisted of 17 close-ended questions asking respondents about their experiences delivering messages to peers and their perceptions of the Ethos program. Four open-ended questions asked respondents about rewarding and challenging aspects of being a peer messenger and what they would change about the program. Results Sixty EMs provided responses to the survey (response rate, 41.4%). The majority were from nursing and medical groups (53.4%) and had delivered 1-5 messages to staff (57.7%). Time as an EM ranged from less than 3 months to more than 12 months. A majority had been an EM for more than 12 months (80%; n  = 40). Most agreed they had received sufficient training for the role (90.1%; n  = 48) and had the skills (90.1%; n  = 48), access to support (84.9%; n  = 45) and time to fulfil their responsibilities (70.0%; n  = 30). Approximately a third (34.9%; n  = 15) of respondents indicated that recipients were 'sometimes' or 'never' receptive to messages. Challenging aspects of the role included organising a time to talk with staff, delivering feedback effectively and communicating with peers who lacked insight and were unable to reflect on their behaviour. Conclusions Skills development for peer messengers is key to ensuring the effectiveness and sustainability of professional accountability programs. Training in how to deliver difficult information and respond to negative reactions to feedback was identified by EMs as essential to support their ongoing effectiveness in their role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of physiotherapy-led lung ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Clinical governance implications of a Victorian coronial finding regarding contrast-related anaphylaxis for health services and private providers of radiology services. Implementation of an in-reach rehabilitation program can increase the rate of discharge home from acute hospital care. Establishment of the first Australian public and health-professional palliative care advice service: exploring caller needs and gaps in care. Evaluating an implementation of the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1