{"title":"替波替尼成功治疗MET外显子14跳脱及Oncomine Dx靶试验与ArcherMET结果不一致的腺癌1例报告","authors":"Yoko Onodera, Akimasa Sekine, Eri Hagiwara, Sho Yamada, Satoshi Ikeda, Erina Tabata, Hideya Kitamura, Tomohisa Baba, Shigeru Komatsu, Koji Okudela, Takashi Ogura","doi":"10.3892/mco.2023.2645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are often positive for oncogenic driver mutations, such as EGFR, ALK, BRAF, RET and MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14 skipping). Recently, METex14 skipping has become a functional biomarker for NSCLC with the approval of MET kinase inhibitors. Tepotinib is an oral MET kinase inhibitor. Its overall response rate is 46%, and the median duration of the response is 11.1 months. In Japan, companion diagnostics for tepotinib are limited with the ArcherMET and AmoyDx test, but not with Oncomine Dx target test. The present study reports the case of a 60-year-old male patient with lung adenocarcinoma harboring METex14 skipping, which was positive on Oncomine DxTT, but not on ArcherMET. In his sample used for Oncomine DxTT, the read count of MET(13)-MET(15) products was only 46. He was treated with various chemotherapeutic agents, but developed cardiac tamponade due to the progression of the disease of mediastinal lymph node metastases. Tepotinib was administered following pericardial drainage, resulting in an immediate response in all lesions. The majority of the discordant samples between Oncomine DxTT and ArcherMET had read counts <800, and the patient described herein had only 46. Therefore, the results of the present study indicate that the use of tepotinib should be considered even in patients whose METex14 skipping results were negative with ArcherMET, yet positive on Oncomine DxTT, particularly relatively with low lead counts.</p>","PeriodicalId":18737,"journal":{"name":"Molecular and clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204052/pdf/mco-18-06-02645.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Successful tepotinib treatment of adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping and discordant results between Oncomine Dx target test and ArcherMET: A case report.\",\"authors\":\"Yoko Onodera, Akimasa Sekine, Eri Hagiwara, Sho Yamada, Satoshi Ikeda, Erina Tabata, Hideya Kitamura, Tomohisa Baba, Shigeru Komatsu, Koji Okudela, Takashi Ogura\",\"doi\":\"10.3892/mco.2023.2645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are often positive for oncogenic driver mutations, such as EGFR, ALK, BRAF, RET and MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14 skipping). Recently, METex14 skipping has become a functional biomarker for NSCLC with the approval of MET kinase inhibitors. Tepotinib is an oral MET kinase inhibitor. Its overall response rate is 46%, and the median duration of the response is 11.1 months. In Japan, companion diagnostics for tepotinib are limited with the ArcherMET and AmoyDx test, but not with Oncomine Dx target test. The present study reports the case of a 60-year-old male patient with lung adenocarcinoma harboring METex14 skipping, which was positive on Oncomine DxTT, but not on ArcherMET. In his sample used for Oncomine DxTT, the read count of MET(13)-MET(15) products was only 46. He was treated with various chemotherapeutic agents, but developed cardiac tamponade due to the progression of the disease of mediastinal lymph node metastases. Tepotinib was administered following pericardial drainage, resulting in an immediate response in all lesions. The majority of the discordant samples between Oncomine DxTT and ArcherMET had read counts <800, and the patient described herein had only 46. Therefore, the results of the present study indicate that the use of tepotinib should be considered even in patients whose METex14 skipping results were negative with ArcherMET, yet positive on Oncomine DxTT, particularly relatively with low lead counts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular and clinical oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204052/pdf/mco-18-06-02645.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular and clinical oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular and clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2023.2645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Successful tepotinib treatment of adenocarcinoma with MET exon 14 skipping and discordant results between Oncomine Dx target test and ArcherMET: A case report.
Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are often positive for oncogenic driver mutations, such as EGFR, ALK, BRAF, RET and MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14 skipping). Recently, METex14 skipping has become a functional biomarker for NSCLC with the approval of MET kinase inhibitors. Tepotinib is an oral MET kinase inhibitor. Its overall response rate is 46%, and the median duration of the response is 11.1 months. In Japan, companion diagnostics for tepotinib are limited with the ArcherMET and AmoyDx test, but not with Oncomine Dx target test. The present study reports the case of a 60-year-old male patient with lung adenocarcinoma harboring METex14 skipping, which was positive on Oncomine DxTT, but not on ArcherMET. In his sample used for Oncomine DxTT, the read count of MET(13)-MET(15) products was only 46. He was treated with various chemotherapeutic agents, but developed cardiac tamponade due to the progression of the disease of mediastinal lymph node metastases. Tepotinib was administered following pericardial drainage, resulting in an immediate response in all lesions. The majority of the discordant samples between Oncomine DxTT and ArcherMET had read counts <800, and the patient described herein had only 46. Therefore, the results of the present study indicate that the use of tepotinib should be considered even in patients whose METex14 skipping results were negative with ArcherMET, yet positive on Oncomine DxTT, particularly relatively with low lead counts.