分娩中孕妇的医学检索:范围综述

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Australasian Emergency Care Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.auec.2022.10.002
Jessica McInnes , Bridget Honan , Richard Johnson , Cheryl Durup , Ajay Venkatesh , Fergus William Gardiner , Rebecca Schultz , Breeanna Spring
{"title":"分娩中孕妇的医学检索:范围综述","authors":"Jessica McInnes ,&nbsp;Bridget Honan ,&nbsp;Richard Johnson ,&nbsp;Cheryl Durup ,&nbsp;Ajay Venkatesh ,&nbsp;Fergus William Gardiner ,&nbsp;Rebecca Schultz ,&nbsp;Breeanna Spring","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2022.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Remote Australian women in labour often rely on retrieval services to allow birthing in specialist </span>obstetric centres. However, there is currently debate over when </span><em>not</em> to transfer a woman in labour, for risk of an in-transit birth, associated with worse neonatal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A scoping review methodology was undertaken, to define the scope of published literature on the topic and identify gaps in the current knowledge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>A total of seven full texts were deemed suitable for synthesis, which were all retrospective observational studies. Four themes from the studies’ findings were identified: population features, predicting time-to-birth, use of tocolysis and birth during </span>medical evacuation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The evidence identified in this review was of low methodological quality and heterogenous. The key findings were that births in-flight are rare, despite geographical distances and long transport times, with a knowledge gap on predictors of time-to-birth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical retrieval of pregnant women in labour: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Jessica McInnes ,&nbsp;Bridget Honan ,&nbsp;Richard Johnson ,&nbsp;Cheryl Durup ,&nbsp;Ajay Venkatesh ,&nbsp;Fergus William Gardiner ,&nbsp;Rebecca Schultz ,&nbsp;Breeanna Spring\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.auec.2022.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span><span>Remote Australian women in labour often rely on retrieval services to allow birthing in specialist </span>obstetric centres. However, there is currently debate over when </span><em>not</em> to transfer a woman in labour, for risk of an in-transit birth, associated with worse neonatal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A scoping review methodology was undertaken, to define the scope of published literature on the topic and identify gaps in the current knowledge.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>A total of seven full texts were deemed suitable for synthesis, which were all retrospective observational studies. Four themes from the studies’ findings were identified: population features, predicting time-to-birth, use of tocolysis and birth during </span>medical evacuation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The evidence identified in this review was of low methodological quality and heterogenous. The key findings were that births in-flight are rare, despite geographical distances and long transport times, with a knowledge gap on predictors of time-to-birth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X22000859\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X22000859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景偏远的澳大利亚分娩妇女通常依靠取回服务在专业产科中心分娩。然而,目前存在着关于何时不转移分娩中的妇女的争论,因为在途中分娩的风险与更糟糕的新生儿结局有关。方法采用范围界定审查方法,以确定已发表的有关该主题的文献的范围,并确定当前知识的差距。结果共有7篇全文被认为适合综合,均为回顾性观察研究。研究结果中确定了四个主题:人口特征、预测出生时间、使用分娩方法和医疗后送期间的分娩。结论本综述中确定的证据方法学质量低且异质性强。关键发现是,尽管地理距离遥远,运输时间长,但在飞行中分娩的情况很少见,而且在预测出生时间方面存在知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical retrieval of pregnant women in labour: A scoping review

Background

Remote Australian women in labour often rely on retrieval services to allow birthing in specialist obstetric centres. However, there is currently debate over when not to transfer a woman in labour, for risk of an in-transit birth, associated with worse neonatal outcomes.

Methods

A scoping review methodology was undertaken, to define the scope of published literature on the topic and identify gaps in the current knowledge.

Results

A total of seven full texts were deemed suitable for synthesis, which were all retrospective observational studies. Four themes from the studies’ findings were identified: population features, predicting time-to-birth, use of tocolysis and birth during medical evacuation.

Conclusion

The evidence identified in this review was of low methodological quality and heterogenous. The key findings were that births in-flight are rare, despite geographical distances and long transport times, with a knowledge gap on predictors of time-to-birth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
期刊最新文献
Nonstandard cardiopulmonary resuscitation and basic life support: A scoping review of techniques applicable to wheelchair users. Strengthening emergency department response to chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear disasters: A scoping review. Emergency management of orbital compartment syndrome: Lateral canthotomy and cantholysis case series. A scoping review study of patients with a primary immune deficiency who have presented to the paediatric emergency department with a fever. X-ray imaging of multiple adjacent regions in paediatric patients: Potential utility for diagnosis and patient management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1