马拉维利隆圭Kamuzu中心医院临床重要细菌病原体的抗微生物药敏概况

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Malawi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.4314/mmj.v34i1.3
Faheema E Choonara, Bjørg C Haldorsen, Isaac Ndhlovu, Osborne Saulosi, Tarsizio Maida, Fanuel Lampiao, Gunnar S Simonsen, Sabiha Y Essack, Arnfinn Sundsfjord
{"title":"马拉维利隆圭Kamuzu中心医院临床重要细菌病原体的抗微生物药敏概况","authors":"Faheema E Choonara,&nbsp;Bjørg C Haldorsen,&nbsp;Isaac Ndhlovu,&nbsp;Osborne Saulosi,&nbsp;Tarsizio Maida,&nbsp;Fanuel Lampiao,&nbsp;Gunnar S Simonsen,&nbsp;Sabiha Y Essack,&nbsp;Arnfinn Sundsfjord","doi":"10.4314/mmj.v34i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this prospective study was to ascertain antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in clinical bacterial pathogens from in-hospital adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical specimens (blood culture, pus, urine and cerebrospinal fluid) collected during June to December 2017 were examined for bacterial growth in standard aerobic conditions. One specimen per patient was included. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the disk diffusion method and interpreted according to EUCAST guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 694 specimens were collected during the study period, of which 336 (48%) specimen yielded visible bacterial growth. Of the 336 specimens, a total of 411 phenotypically different isolates were recovered. Of the 411 isolates, 84 isolates (20%) were excluded and the remaining 327 (80%) were further characterised. The characterised isolates were identified as ESKAPE pathogens (n=195/327; 60%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (n=92/327; 28%), <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> (n=33/327; 10) or <i>Salmonella</i> spp. (n=7/327; 2%) and were included for further analysis. The excluded isolates (n=84) comprised of coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=25), streptococci (n=33), and low-prevalence Gram-negative bacilli (n=26). <i>E. coli</i> (n=92; 28%) and <i>S. aureus</i> (n=86; 26%) were the most dominant species. A multidrug resistant (MDR) extended spectrum β- lactamase (ESBL)-positive phenotype was detected in <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (n=20/29; 69%) and <i>E. coli</i> (n=49/92; 53%). One third of the <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> isolates were resistant to meropenem (MEM), but did not appear to be carbapenemase-producers. Methicillin resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) was molecularly confirmed in 10.5% of <i>S. aureus</i> (n=9/86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high proportion of the MDR ESBL-phenotype in clinical isolates of <i>Enterobacterales</i>, strongly limits antimicrobial treatment options and has consequences for empirical and targeted antimicrobial treatment as well as clinical microbiology services and hospital infection control. There is need for a continuous surveillance and an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program to contain and prevent the spread of AMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":18185,"journal":{"name":"Malawi Medical Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/66/d6/MMJ3401-0009.PMC10230581.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of clinically important bacterial pathogens at the Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi.\",\"authors\":\"Faheema E Choonara,&nbsp;Bjørg C Haldorsen,&nbsp;Isaac Ndhlovu,&nbsp;Osborne Saulosi,&nbsp;Tarsizio Maida,&nbsp;Fanuel Lampiao,&nbsp;Gunnar S Simonsen,&nbsp;Sabiha Y Essack,&nbsp;Arnfinn Sundsfjord\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/mmj.v34i1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this prospective study was to ascertain antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in clinical bacterial pathogens from in-hospital adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical specimens (blood culture, pus, urine and cerebrospinal fluid) collected during June to December 2017 were examined for bacterial growth in standard aerobic conditions. One specimen per patient was included. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the disk diffusion method and interpreted according to EUCAST guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 694 specimens were collected during the study period, of which 336 (48%) specimen yielded visible bacterial growth. Of the 336 specimens, a total of 411 phenotypically different isolates were recovered. Of the 411 isolates, 84 isolates (20%) were excluded and the remaining 327 (80%) were further characterised. The characterised isolates were identified as ESKAPE pathogens (n=195/327; 60%), <i>Escherichia coli</i> (n=92/327; 28%), <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> (n=33/327; 10) or <i>Salmonella</i> spp. (n=7/327; 2%) and were included for further analysis. The excluded isolates (n=84) comprised of coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=25), streptococci (n=33), and low-prevalence Gram-negative bacilli (n=26). <i>E. coli</i> (n=92; 28%) and <i>S. aureus</i> (n=86; 26%) were the most dominant species. A multidrug resistant (MDR) extended spectrum β- lactamase (ESBL)-positive phenotype was detected in <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (n=20/29; 69%) and <i>E. coli</i> (n=49/92; 53%). One third of the <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> isolates were resistant to meropenem (MEM), but did not appear to be carbapenemase-producers. Methicillin resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) was molecularly confirmed in 10.5% of <i>S. aureus</i> (n=9/86).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high proportion of the MDR ESBL-phenotype in clinical isolates of <i>Enterobacterales</i>, strongly limits antimicrobial treatment options and has consequences for empirical and targeted antimicrobial treatment as well as clinical microbiology services and hospital infection control. There is need for a continuous surveillance and an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program to contain and prevent the spread of AMR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malawi Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"9-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/66/d6/MMJ3401-0009.PMC10230581.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malawi Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v34i1.3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malawi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v34i1.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:本前瞻性研究的目的是确定马拉维利隆圭一家三级医院住院成人患者临床细菌性病原体的抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)。方法:对2017年6 - 12月采集的临床标本(血培养、脓、尿、脑脊液)在标准有氧条件下进行细菌生长检查。每位患者一份标本。采用纸片扩散法进行抗菌药敏试验,并按EUCAST指南进行解释。结果:研究期间共采集标本694份,其中336份(48%)标本可见细菌生长。在336份标本中,共恢复了411株表型不同的分离株。在411株中,84株(20%)被排除,其余327株(80%)被进一步鉴定。鉴定的分离株为ESKAPE病原菌(n=195/327;60%),大肠杆菌(n=92/327;28%),奇异变形杆菌(n=33/327;10)或沙门氏菌(n=7/327;2%),并纳入进一步分析。被排除的分离株(84株)包括凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(25株)、链球菌(33株)和低流行的革兰氏阴性杆菌(26株)。大肠杆菌(n=92;28%)和金黄色葡萄球菌(n=86;26%)为优势种。肺炎克雷伯菌中检测到多药耐药(MDR)扩展谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)阳性表型(n=20/29;69%)和大肠杆菌(n=49/92;53%)。三分之一的铜绿假单胞菌分离株对美罗培南(MEM)耐药,但似乎不产生碳青霉烯酶。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)在10.5%的金黄色葡萄球菌(n=9/86)中得到分子鉴定。结论:肠杆菌临床分离株中耐多药esbl表型的高比例,严重限制了抗菌治疗的选择,并对经经验和靶向抗菌治疗以及临床微生物学服务和医院感染控制造成影响。有必要开展持续监测和抗微生物药物管理(AMS)规划,以遏制和防止抗生素耐药性的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of clinically important bacterial pathogens at the Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi.

Background: The aim of this prospective study was to ascertain antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in clinical bacterial pathogens from in-hospital adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi.

Methods: Clinical specimens (blood culture, pus, urine and cerebrospinal fluid) collected during June to December 2017 were examined for bacterial growth in standard aerobic conditions. One specimen per patient was included. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the disk diffusion method and interpreted according to EUCAST guidelines.

Results: A total of 694 specimens were collected during the study period, of which 336 (48%) specimen yielded visible bacterial growth. Of the 336 specimens, a total of 411 phenotypically different isolates were recovered. Of the 411 isolates, 84 isolates (20%) were excluded and the remaining 327 (80%) were further characterised. The characterised isolates were identified as ESKAPE pathogens (n=195/327; 60%), Escherichia coli (n=92/327; 28%), Proteus mirabilis (n=33/327; 10) or Salmonella spp. (n=7/327; 2%) and were included for further analysis. The excluded isolates (n=84) comprised of coagulase-negative staphylococci (n=25), streptococci (n=33), and low-prevalence Gram-negative bacilli (n=26). E. coli (n=92; 28%) and S. aureus (n=86; 26%) were the most dominant species. A multidrug resistant (MDR) extended spectrum β- lactamase (ESBL)-positive phenotype was detected in Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=20/29; 69%) and E. coli (n=49/92; 53%). One third of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were resistant to meropenem (MEM), but did not appear to be carbapenemase-producers. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was molecularly confirmed in 10.5% of S. aureus (n=9/86).

Conclusion: The high proportion of the MDR ESBL-phenotype in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales, strongly limits antimicrobial treatment options and has consequences for empirical and targeted antimicrobial treatment as well as clinical microbiology services and hospital infection control. There is need for a continuous surveillance and an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program to contain and prevent the spread of AMR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malawi Medical Journal
Malawi Medical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Driven and guided by the priorities articulated in the Malawi National Health Research Agenda, the Malawi Medical Journal publishes original research, short reports, case reports, viewpoints, insightful editorials and commentaries that are of high quality, informative and applicable to the Malawian and sub-Saharan Africa regions. Our particular interest is to publish evidence-based research that impacts and informs national health policies and medical practice in Malawi and the broader region. Topics covered in the journal include, but are not limited to: - Communicable diseases (HIV and AIDS, Malaria, TB, etc.) - Non-communicable diseases (Cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, etc.) - Sexual and Reproductive Health (Adolescent health, education, pregnancy and abortion, STDs and HIV and AIDS, etc.) - Mental health - Environmental health - Nutrition - Health systems and health policy (Leadership, ethics, and governance) - Community systems strengthening research - Injury, trauma, and surgical disorders
期刊最新文献
Assessment of descending aortic blood flow velocities with continuous wave Doppler echocardiography among healthy Children in South East Nigeria. A rare dental complication caused by a rare pathogen: Preseptal Cellulitis caused by Pseudomonas Oryzihabitans: a case report. An exceptional cause of acute respiratory failure in an infant: negative pressure pulmonary edema. A rare case of Odontogenic Keratocyst in the Maxillary Sinus: diagnosis and management. Is it possible to predict Surgical Site Infection?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1