环周森林模型模拟陆地净初级生产力对气候变化的过度正向响应。

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2020-07-01 eCollection Date: 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1002/pei3.10025
Shunsuke Tei, Atsuko Sugimoto
{"title":"环周森林模型模拟陆地净初级生产力对气候变化的过度正向响应。","authors":"Shunsuke Tei, Atsuko Sugimoto","doi":"10.1002/pei3.10025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Land carbon cycle components in an Earth system model (ESM) play a crucial role in the projections of forest ecosystem responses to climate/environmental changes. Evaluating models from the viewpoint of observations is essential for an improved understanding of model performance and for identifying uncertainties in their outputs. Herein, we evaluated the land net primary production (NPP) for circumboreal forests simulated with 10 ESMs in Phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project by comparisons with observation-based indexes for forest productivity, namely, the composite version 3G of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI3g) and tree-ring width index (RWI). These indexes show similar patterns in response to past climate change over the forests, i.e., a one-year time lag response and smaller positive responses to past climate changes in comparison with the land NPP simulated by the ESMs. The latter showed overly positive responses to past temperature and/or precipitation changes in comparison with the NDVI3g and RWI. These results indicate that ESMs may overestimate the future forest NPP of circumboreal forests (particularly for inland dry regions, such as inner Alaska and Canada, and eastern Siberia, and for hotter, southern regions, such as central Europe) under the expected increases in both average global temperature and precipitation, which are common to all current ESMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74457,"journal":{"name":"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excessive positive response of model-simulated land net primary production to climate changes over circumboreal forests.\",\"authors\":\"Shunsuke Tei, Atsuko Sugimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pei3.10025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Land carbon cycle components in an Earth system model (ESM) play a crucial role in the projections of forest ecosystem responses to climate/environmental changes. Evaluating models from the viewpoint of observations is essential for an improved understanding of model performance and for identifying uncertainties in their outputs. Herein, we evaluated the land net primary production (NPP) for circumboreal forests simulated with 10 ESMs in Phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project by comparisons with observation-based indexes for forest productivity, namely, the composite version 3G of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI3g) and tree-ring width index (RWI). These indexes show similar patterns in response to past climate change over the forests, i.e., a one-year time lag response and smaller positive responses to past climate changes in comparison with the land NPP simulated by the ESMs. The latter showed overly positive responses to past temperature and/or precipitation changes in comparison with the NDVI3g and RWI. These results indicate that ESMs may overestimate the future forest NPP of circumboreal forests (particularly for inland dry regions, such as inner Alaska and Canada, and eastern Siberia, and for hotter, southern regions, such as central Europe) under the expected increases in both average global temperature and precipitation, which are common to all current ESMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168094/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地球系统模型(ESM)中的陆地碳循环成分在预测森林生态系统对气候/环境变化的响应方面发挥着至关重要的作用。从观测角度对模型进行评估对于更好地了解模型性能和识别其输出结果中的不确定性至关重要。在此,我们通过与基于观测的森林生产力指数(即归一化差异植被指数(NDVI3g)和树环宽度指数(RWI)的复合版本 3G)进行比较,评估了耦合模式相互比较项目第五阶段中用 10 个 ESM 模拟的环周森林陆地净初级生产力(NPP)。这些指数显示了森林对过去气候变化的类似响应模式,即与无害环境管理模拟的陆地净生产力相比,对过去气候变化的响应有一年的时滞,正响应较小。与 NDVI3g 和 RWI 相比,后者对过去气温和/或降水变化的正向响应更大。这些结果表明,在全球平均气温和降水量预计都会增加的情况下,ESM 可能会高估环周森林(尤其是内陆干旱地区,如阿拉斯加州内和加拿大以及西伯利亚东部,以及较炎热的南部地区,如欧洲中部)未来的森林净生产力,而这是目前所有 ESM 的共同特点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Excessive positive response of model-simulated land net primary production to climate changes over circumboreal forests.

Land carbon cycle components in an Earth system model (ESM) play a crucial role in the projections of forest ecosystem responses to climate/environmental changes. Evaluating models from the viewpoint of observations is essential for an improved understanding of model performance and for identifying uncertainties in their outputs. Herein, we evaluated the land net primary production (NPP) for circumboreal forests simulated with 10 ESMs in Phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project by comparisons with observation-based indexes for forest productivity, namely, the composite version 3G of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI3g) and tree-ring width index (RWI). These indexes show similar patterns in response to past climate change over the forests, i.e., a one-year time lag response and smaller positive responses to past climate changes in comparison with the land NPP simulated by the ESMs. The latter showed overly positive responses to past temperature and/or precipitation changes in comparison with the NDVI3g and RWI. These results indicate that ESMs may overestimate the future forest NPP of circumboreal forests (particularly for inland dry regions, such as inner Alaska and Canada, and eastern Siberia, and for hotter, southern regions, such as central Europe) under the expected increases in both average global temperature and precipitation, which are common to all current ESMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Untying the knot: Unraveling genetic mechanisms behind black knot disease resistance in Prunus salicina (Japanese plum). Inhibitory effects of N-trans-cinnamoyltyramine on growth of invasive weeds and weedy rice. An intelligent system for determining the degree of tree bark beetle damage based on the use of generative-adversarial neural networks. Picophytoplankton prevail year-round in the Elbe estuary. How dry is dead? Evaluating the impact of desiccation on the viability of the invasive species Cissus quadrangularis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1