未来的异种移植系统:历史与生物伦理方法论的融合。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Cell Transplantation Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/09636897231170510
Adam Negri, Lauren Wilson
{"title":"未来的异种移植系统:历史与生物伦理方法论的融合。","authors":"Adam Negri, Lauren Wilson","doi":"10.1177/09636897231170510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The future of xenotransplantation is promising. However, the scientific process behind xenotransplantation, shown through the methodology of history and bioethics, involves stakeholders beyond the laboratory. We present three short vignettes, the history of a 20th-century pioneer in solid organ transplantation, the xenoheart received by David Bennett, and a global system of illegal organ procurement, to highlight the complexity of biomedical practice. Current solid organ transplantation systems are seemingly unsustainable and ineffective in satisfying a growing global demand for organs. Despite the shortcomings of current systems, we argue that the discourse surrounding xenotransplantation science is insufficient to construct a long-lasting and equitable replacement for solid organ transplantation. Xenotransplantation is more than a surgical technique, an interdisciplinary health concern, or a biomedical technology-it is deeply dependent on a series of cultural, historical, and social factors. Incorporating a greater variety of perspectives and disciplines into ongoing discussions of xenotransplantation science, while potentially frustrating in the short term, will act to maximize its potential as a paradigm-shifting science.</p>","PeriodicalId":9721,"journal":{"name":"Cell Transplantation","volume":"32 ","pages":"9636897231170510"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cd/57/10.1177_09636897231170510.PMC10233605.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Future Systems of Xenotransplantation: Melding Historical and Bioethical Methodology.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Negri, Lauren Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09636897231170510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The future of xenotransplantation is promising. However, the scientific process behind xenotransplantation, shown through the methodology of history and bioethics, involves stakeholders beyond the laboratory. We present three short vignettes, the history of a 20th-century pioneer in solid organ transplantation, the xenoheart received by David Bennett, and a global system of illegal organ procurement, to highlight the complexity of biomedical practice. Current solid organ transplantation systems are seemingly unsustainable and ineffective in satisfying a growing global demand for organs. Despite the shortcomings of current systems, we argue that the discourse surrounding xenotransplantation science is insufficient to construct a long-lasting and equitable replacement for solid organ transplantation. Xenotransplantation is more than a surgical technique, an interdisciplinary health concern, or a biomedical technology-it is deeply dependent on a series of cultural, historical, and social factors. Incorporating a greater variety of perspectives and disciplines into ongoing discussions of xenotransplantation science, while potentially frustrating in the short term, will act to maximize its potential as a paradigm-shifting science.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cell Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"32 \",\"pages\":\"9636897231170510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cd/57/10.1177_09636897231170510.PMC10233605.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cell Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897231170510\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897231170510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

异种器官移植前景广阔。然而,通过历史和生命伦理学的方法展示异种器官移植背后的科学过程,涉及实验室之外的利益相关者。我们介绍了三个小故事:20 世纪实体器官移植先驱的历史、戴维-贝内特(David Bennett)接受的异种心脏以及全球非法器官采购系统,以突出生物医学实践的复杂性。目前的实体器官移植系统似乎难以为继,无法有效满足全球日益增长的器官需求。尽管目前的系统存在缺陷,但我们认为,围绕异种器官移植科学的讨论不足以构建一个持久、公平的实体器官移植替代方案。异种器官移植不仅仅是一项外科技术、一个跨学科的健康问题或一项生物医学技术--它深深依赖于一系列文化、历史和社会因素。将更多不同的视角和学科纳入正在进行的异种器官移植科学讨论,虽然短期内可能会令人沮丧,但却能最大限度地发挥其作为一门范式转换科学的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Future Systems of Xenotransplantation: Melding Historical and Bioethical Methodology.

The future of xenotransplantation is promising. However, the scientific process behind xenotransplantation, shown through the methodology of history and bioethics, involves stakeholders beyond the laboratory. We present three short vignettes, the history of a 20th-century pioneer in solid organ transplantation, the xenoheart received by David Bennett, and a global system of illegal organ procurement, to highlight the complexity of biomedical practice. Current solid organ transplantation systems are seemingly unsustainable and ineffective in satisfying a growing global demand for organs. Despite the shortcomings of current systems, we argue that the discourse surrounding xenotransplantation science is insufficient to construct a long-lasting and equitable replacement for solid organ transplantation. Xenotransplantation is more than a surgical technique, an interdisciplinary health concern, or a biomedical technology-it is deeply dependent on a series of cultural, historical, and social factors. Incorporating a greater variety of perspectives and disciplines into ongoing discussions of xenotransplantation science, while potentially frustrating in the short term, will act to maximize its potential as a paradigm-shifting science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cell Transplantation
Cell Transplantation 生物-细胞与组织工程
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cell Transplantation, The Regenerative Medicine Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that is published 12 times annually. Cell Transplantation is a multi-disciplinary forum for publication of articles on cell transplantation and its applications to human diseases. Articles focus on a myriad of topics including the physiological, medical, pre-clinical, tissue engineering, stem cell, and device-oriented aspects of the nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, and endothelial systems, as well as genetically engineered cells. Cell Transplantation also reports on relevant technological advances, clinical studies, and regulatory considerations related to the implantation of cells into the body in order to provide complete coverage of the field.
期刊最新文献
ASNTR 2024 Abstracts Role of Hedgehog Signaling Pathways in Multipotent Mesenchymal Stem Cells Differentiation Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Sickle Cell Disease: A Multidimentional Review Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Augmentation Therapy in Chronic Pancreatitis Patients Undergoing Total Pancreatectomy and Islet Autotransplantation: A Randomized, Controlled Study Persistent Cytopenia After CD19 CAR T Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL Patients Could Be a Predictor of Efficacy and Side Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1