癌症II期和III期患者参与化疗决策。

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2023-03-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683231163189
Jessica D Austin, Elizabeth Shelton, Danielle M Crookes, Parisa Tehranifar, Alfred I Neugut, Rachel C Shelton
{"title":"癌症II期和III期患者参与化疗决策。","authors":"Jessica D Austin, Elizabeth Shelton, Danielle M Crookes, Parisa Tehranifar, Alfred I Neugut, Rachel C Shelton","doi":"10.1177/23814683231163189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> To explore preferred and actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making among stage II and III colon cancer (CC) patients by sociodemographic, interpersonal, and intrapersonal communication factors. <b>Methods.</b> Cross-sectional exploratory study collecting self-reported survey data from stage II and III CC patients from 2 cancer centers located in northern Manhattan. <b>Results.</b> Of 88 patients approached, 56 completed the survey. Only 19.3% reported shared involvement in their chemotherapy decisions. We observed significant differences in preferred involvement by gender, with women preferring more physician-controlled decisions. CC patients with higher levels of decisional self-efficacy significantly preferred shared decisions (<i>F</i> = 4.4 [2], <i>P</i> = 0.02). Actual involvement in decisions differed by race (physician controlled 33% for White v. 67% for Other, <i>P</i> < 0.01), age (shared control 18% for ≤55 y, 55% for 55-64 y, and 27% for 65+ y, <i>P</i> = 0.04), and perception of choice (shared control 73% \"yes\" v. 27% \"no,\"<i>P</i> = 0.02). Actual or preferred involvement did not differ by stage. Significantly higher levels of medical mistrust (discrimination <i>t</i> = 2.8 [50], <i>P = 0</i>.01; lack of support <i>t</i> = 3.6 [49], <i>P</i> < 0.01), and lower levels of decisional self-efficacy (<i>t</i> = 2.5 [49], <i>P = 0</i>.01) were reported among women. <b>Discussion.</b> Reports of shared involvement around chemotherapy decisions is limited among CC patients. Factors influencing preferred versus actual chemotherapy decision making are complex and may differ; hence, more research is needed to understand and address factors contributing to discordance between preferred and actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making for CC patients.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Shared involvement around chemotherapy decisions remains limited for patients diagnosed with colon cancer.Sociodemographic (age, race, gender), interpersonal (medical mistrust), and intrapersonal (decisional self-efficacy, perception of choice) factors that influence preferred involvement in chemotherapy decision making may differ from those influencing actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making.Shared involvement in chemotherapy decisions may look different than currently conceptualized, notably when uncertainty around the benefits exists.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"8 1","pages":"23814683231163189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/e1/10.1177_23814683231163189.PMC10052499.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Involvement in Chemotherapy Decision Making among Patients with Stage II and III Colon Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica D Austin, Elizabeth Shelton, Danielle M Crookes, Parisa Tehranifar, Alfred I Neugut, Rachel C Shelton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23814683231163189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> To explore preferred and actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making among stage II and III colon cancer (CC) patients by sociodemographic, interpersonal, and intrapersonal communication factors. <b>Methods.</b> Cross-sectional exploratory study collecting self-reported survey data from stage II and III CC patients from 2 cancer centers located in northern Manhattan. <b>Results.</b> Of 88 patients approached, 56 completed the survey. Only 19.3% reported shared involvement in their chemotherapy decisions. We observed significant differences in preferred involvement by gender, with women preferring more physician-controlled decisions. CC patients with higher levels of decisional self-efficacy significantly preferred shared decisions (<i>F</i> = 4.4 [2], <i>P</i> = 0.02). Actual involvement in decisions differed by race (physician controlled 33% for White v. 67% for Other, <i>P</i> < 0.01), age (shared control 18% for ≤55 y, 55% for 55-64 y, and 27% for 65+ y, <i>P</i> = 0.04), and perception of choice (shared control 73% \\\"yes\\\" v. 27% \\\"no,\\\"<i>P</i> = 0.02). Actual or preferred involvement did not differ by stage. Significantly higher levels of medical mistrust (discrimination <i>t</i> = 2.8 [50], <i>P = 0</i>.01; lack of support <i>t</i> = 3.6 [49], <i>P</i> < 0.01), and lower levels of decisional self-efficacy (<i>t</i> = 2.5 [49], <i>P = 0</i>.01) were reported among women. <b>Discussion.</b> Reports of shared involvement around chemotherapy decisions is limited among CC patients. Factors influencing preferred versus actual chemotherapy decision making are complex and may differ; hence, more research is needed to understand and address factors contributing to discordance between preferred and actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making for CC patients.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Shared involvement around chemotherapy decisions remains limited for patients diagnosed with colon cancer.Sociodemographic (age, race, gender), interpersonal (medical mistrust), and intrapersonal (decisional self-efficacy, perception of choice) factors that influence preferred involvement in chemotherapy decision making may differ from those influencing actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making.Shared involvement in chemotherapy decisions may look different than currently conceptualized, notably when uncertainty around the benefits exists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"23814683231163189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/e1/10.1177_23814683231163189.PMC10052499.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683231163189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683231163189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景探讨社会人口学、人际交往和人际沟通因素对癌症II期和III期患者化疗决策的偏好和实际参与。方法。跨节探索性研究收集了来自曼哈顿北部2个癌症中心的II期和III期CC患者的自我报告调查数据。后果在88名患者中,56人完成了调查。只有19.3%的人报告共同参与了他们的化疗决定。我们观察到,不同性别在首选参与方面存在显著差异,女性更喜欢医生控制的决策。决策自我效能水平较高的CC患者更喜欢共同决策(F=4.4[2],P=0.02)。实际参与决策的程度因种族而异(医生控制的白人占33%,其他人占67%,P<0.01)、年龄(≤55岁的共同控制18%,55-64岁的共同控制55%,65+y的共同控制27%,P=0.04),以及对选择的感知(共有对照组73%的人“是”,27%的人“否”,P=0.02)。实际参与或首选参与没有阶段差异。据报道,女性的医疗不信任水平显著较高(歧视t=2.8[50],P=0.01;缺乏支持t=3.6[49],P<0.01),决策自我效能水平较低(t=2.5[49],P=0.01)。讨论关于共同参与化疗决策的报道在CC患者中是有限的。影响首选化疗决策与实际化疗决策的因素很复杂,可能有所不同;因此,需要更多的研究来了解和解决导致CC患者化疗决策中首选和实际参与之间不一致的因素。要点:对于诊断为癌症的患者来说,共同参与化疗决策仍然有限。影响首选参与化疗决策的社会因素(年龄、种族、性别)、人际因素(医学不信任)和个人因素(决策自我效能感、选择感知)可能与影响实际参与化疗决策不同。共同参与化疗决策可能与目前的概念不同,尤其是当益处存在不确定性时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Involvement in Chemotherapy Decision Making among Patients with Stage II and III Colon Cancer.

Background. To explore preferred and actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making among stage II and III colon cancer (CC) patients by sociodemographic, interpersonal, and intrapersonal communication factors. Methods. Cross-sectional exploratory study collecting self-reported survey data from stage II and III CC patients from 2 cancer centers located in northern Manhattan. Results. Of 88 patients approached, 56 completed the survey. Only 19.3% reported shared involvement in their chemotherapy decisions. We observed significant differences in preferred involvement by gender, with women preferring more physician-controlled decisions. CC patients with higher levels of decisional self-efficacy significantly preferred shared decisions (F = 4.4 [2], P = 0.02). Actual involvement in decisions differed by race (physician controlled 33% for White v. 67% for Other, P < 0.01), age (shared control 18% for ≤55 y, 55% for 55-64 y, and 27% for 65+ y, P = 0.04), and perception of choice (shared control 73% "yes" v. 27% "no,"P = 0.02). Actual or preferred involvement did not differ by stage. Significantly higher levels of medical mistrust (discrimination t = 2.8 [50], P = 0.01; lack of support t = 3.6 [49], P < 0.01), and lower levels of decisional self-efficacy (t = 2.5 [49], P = 0.01) were reported among women. Discussion. Reports of shared involvement around chemotherapy decisions is limited among CC patients. Factors influencing preferred versus actual chemotherapy decision making are complex and may differ; hence, more research is needed to understand and address factors contributing to discordance between preferred and actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making for CC patients.

Highlights: Shared involvement around chemotherapy decisions remains limited for patients diagnosed with colon cancer.Sociodemographic (age, race, gender), interpersonal (medical mistrust), and intrapersonal (decisional self-efficacy, perception of choice) factors that influence preferred involvement in chemotherapy decision making may differ from those influencing actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making.Shared involvement in chemotherapy decisions may look different than currently conceptualized, notably when uncertainty around the benefits exists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prioritizing Patients from the Most Deprived Areas on Elective Waiting Lists in the NHS in England: Estimating the Health and Health Inequality Impact. Optimizing Masks and Random Screening Test Usage within K-12 Schools. Associations of Concordant and Shared Lung Cancer Screening Decision Making with Decisional Conflict: A Multi-Institution Cross-Sectional Analysis. Implications of Diminishing Lifespan Marginal Utility for Valuing Equity in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Evaluation of the Soda Tax on Obesity and Diabetes in California: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1