纵向生物标志物的预选类水平测试减少了在纵向小样本人类研究中产生新见解所需的多次测试更正。

Andrea S Foulkes, Livio Azzoni, Luis J Montaner
{"title":"纵向生物标志物的预选类水平测试减少了在纵向小样本人类研究中产生新见解所需的多次测试更正。","authors":"Andrea S Foulkes,&nbsp;Livio Azzoni,&nbsp;Luis J Montaner","doi":"10.1515/scid-2019-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Exploratory studies that aim to evaluate novel therapeutic strategies in human cohorts often involve the collection of hundreds of variables measured over time on a small sample of individuals. Stringent error control for testing hypotheses in this setting renders it difficult to identify statistically signification associations. The objective of this study is to demonstrate how leveraging prior information about the biological relationships among variables can increase power for novel discovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We apply the class level association score statistic for longitudinal data (CLASS-LD) as an analysis strategy that complements single variable tests. An example is presented that aims to evaluate the relationships among 14 T-cell and monocyte activation variables measured with CD4 T-cell count over three time points after antiretroviral therapy (n=62).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CLASS-LD using three classes with emphasis on T-cell activation with either classical vs. intermediate/inflammatory monocyte subsets detected associations in two of three classes, while single variable testing detected only one out of the 14 variables considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of a class-level testing strategy provides an alternative to single immune variables by defining hypotheses based on a collection of variables that share a known underlying biological relationship. Broader use of class-level analysis is expected to increase the available information that can be derived from limited sample clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74867,"journal":{"name":"Statistical communications in infectious diseases","volume":"12 Suppl1","pages":"20190018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/scid-2019-0018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-selected class-level testing of longitudinal biomarkers reduces required multiple testing corrections to yield novel insights in longitudinal small sample human studies.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea S Foulkes,&nbsp;Livio Azzoni,&nbsp;Luis J Montaner\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/scid-2019-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Exploratory studies that aim to evaluate novel therapeutic strategies in human cohorts often involve the collection of hundreds of variables measured over time on a small sample of individuals. Stringent error control for testing hypotheses in this setting renders it difficult to identify statistically signification associations. The objective of this study is to demonstrate how leveraging prior information about the biological relationships among variables can increase power for novel discovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We apply the class level association score statistic for longitudinal data (CLASS-LD) as an analysis strategy that complements single variable tests. An example is presented that aims to evaluate the relationships among 14 T-cell and monocyte activation variables measured with CD4 T-cell count over three time points after antiretroviral therapy (n=62).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CLASS-LD using three classes with emphasis on T-cell activation with either classical vs. intermediate/inflammatory monocyte subsets detected associations in two of three classes, while single variable testing detected only one out of the 14 variables considered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Application of a class-level testing strategy provides an alternative to single immune variables by defining hypotheses based on a collection of variables that share a known underlying biological relationship. Broader use of class-level analysis is expected to increase the available information that can be derived from limited sample clinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical communications in infectious diseases\",\"volume\":\"12 Suppl1\",\"pages\":\"20190018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/scid-2019-0018\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical communications in infectious diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/scid-2019-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical communications in infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/scid-2019-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:旨在评估人类群体新治疗策略的探索性研究通常涉及收集数百个变量,这些变量随时间在一小部分个体样本上测量。在这种情况下,严格的误差控制测试假设使得很难识别统计意义关联。本研究的目的是证明如何利用关于变量之间生物关系的先验信息可以增加新发现的能力。方法:我们采用纵向数据的类水平关联评分统计(class - ld)作为单变量检验的补充分析策略。本文提出了一个例子,旨在评估抗逆转录病毒治疗后三个时间点上用CD4 t细胞计数测量的14个t细胞和单核细胞活化变量之间的关系(n=62)。结果:CLASS-LD使用三个类别,强调t细胞激活,无论是经典的还是中间/炎症的单核细胞亚群,在三个类别中检测到两个关联,而单变量测试只检测到14个变量中的一个。结论:类水平测试策略的应用提供了一种替代单一免疫变量的方法,该方法基于共享已知潜在生物学关系的变量集合定义假设。类水平分析的广泛使用有望增加可从有限样本临床研究中获得的可用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pre-selected class-level testing of longitudinal biomarkers reduces required multiple testing corrections to yield novel insights in longitudinal small sample human studies.

Objectives: Exploratory studies that aim to evaluate novel therapeutic strategies in human cohorts often involve the collection of hundreds of variables measured over time on a small sample of individuals. Stringent error control for testing hypotheses in this setting renders it difficult to identify statistically signification associations. The objective of this study is to demonstrate how leveraging prior information about the biological relationships among variables can increase power for novel discovery.

Methods: We apply the class level association score statistic for longitudinal data (CLASS-LD) as an analysis strategy that complements single variable tests. An example is presented that aims to evaluate the relationships among 14 T-cell and monocyte activation variables measured with CD4 T-cell count over three time points after antiretroviral therapy (n=62).

Results: CLASS-LD using three classes with emphasis on T-cell activation with either classical vs. intermediate/inflammatory monocyte subsets detected associations in two of three classes, while single variable testing detected only one out of the 14 variables considered.

Conclusions: Application of a class-level testing strategy provides an alternative to single immune variables by defining hypotheses based on a collection of variables that share a known underlying biological relationship. Broader use of class-level analysis is expected to increase the available information that can be derived from limited sample clinical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study design approaches for future active-controlled HIV prevention trials. The role of randomization inference in unraveling individual treatment effects in early phase vaccine trials. Nonlinear mixed-effects models for HIV viral load trajectories before and after antiretroviral therapy interruption, incorporating left censoring. Estimation and interpretation of vaccine efficacy in COVID-19 randomized clinical trials Sample size calculation for active-arm trial with counterfactual incidence based on recency assay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1