使用患者报告的结果测量信息系统®(PROMIS)来识别肺癌幸存者的身体和心理生活质量问题

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1891/JDNP-2022-0018
Amy Hensley, Tracy Campbell, Clifford Gonzales
{"title":"使用患者报告的结果测量信息系统®(PROMIS)来识别肺癌幸存者的身体和心理生活质量问题","authors":"Amy Hensley,&nbsp;Tracy Campbell,&nbsp;Clifford Gonzales","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2022-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Lung cancer survivors (LCS) are living longer due to improved screening and treatment but often experience long-term treatment effects. Due to a traditionally poor prognosis, research related to LCS symptomology and associated quality of life (QOL) is lacking. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study was to develop a process for identifying symptomology and unmet needs affecting QOL in LCS. <b>Methods:</b> A literature review identified recommended methods of implementing a QOL screening program in LCS. Training guidelines using the best evidence were presented to the survivorship clinic (SC) staff. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS-29) profile was used to collect data from LCS. The experience of the SC staff (<i>N</i> = 2) and providers (<i>N</i> = 2) in implementing the QOL screening program in LCS was assessed. <b>Results:</b> A 100% compliance rate in completing the PROMIS-29 profile was achieved. Physical function and pain interference were the most impacted QOL domains identified by LCS, while depression was the least. No challenges were identified in assisting LCS with profile completion. Providers agreed that the PROMIS-29 was instrumental in identifying QOL issues. <b>Conclusion:</b> A QOL screening program tailored to LCS-improved compliance and reliability in identifying QOL issues. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> A QOL screening program using the PROMIS-29 may improve patient-provider interactions and value-based oncology care.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"22-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) to Identify Physical and Psychosocial Quality of Life Issues in Lung Cancer Survivors.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Hensley,&nbsp;Tracy Campbell,&nbsp;Clifford Gonzales\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JDNP-2022-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Lung cancer survivors (LCS) are living longer due to improved screening and treatment but often experience long-term treatment effects. Due to a traditionally poor prognosis, research related to LCS symptomology and associated quality of life (QOL) is lacking. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study was to develop a process for identifying symptomology and unmet needs affecting QOL in LCS. <b>Methods:</b> A literature review identified recommended methods of implementing a QOL screening program in LCS. Training guidelines using the best evidence were presented to the survivorship clinic (SC) staff. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS-29) profile was used to collect data from LCS. The experience of the SC staff (<i>N</i> = 2) and providers (<i>N</i> = 2) in implementing the QOL screening program in LCS was assessed. <b>Results:</b> A 100% compliance rate in completing the PROMIS-29 profile was achieved. Physical function and pain interference were the most impacted QOL domains identified by LCS, while depression was the least. No challenges were identified in assisting LCS with profile completion. Providers agreed that the PROMIS-29 was instrumental in identifying QOL issues. <b>Conclusion:</b> A QOL screening program tailored to LCS-improved compliance and reliability in identifying QOL issues. <b>Implications for Nursing:</b> A QOL screening program using the PROMIS-29 may improve patient-provider interactions and value-based oncology care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"22-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2022-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2022-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺癌幸存者(LCS)由于筛查和治疗的改善而活得更长,但往往经历长期治疗效果。由于传统上预后较差,缺乏与LCS症状和相关生活质量(QOL)相关的研究。目的:本研究的目的是建立一种识别影响LCS患者生活质量的症状和未满足需求的方法。方法:一篇文献综述确定了在LCS中实施生活质量筛选计划的推荐方法。使用最佳证据的培训指南被提交给幸存者诊所(SC)的工作人员。使用患者报告的结果测量信息系统®(promise -29)资料收集LCS的数据。评估SC工作人员(N = 2)和提供者(N = 2)在LCS中实施生活质量筛选计划的经验。结果:100%的依从率完成了promise -29档案。LCS对生活质量影响最大的是身体功能和疼痛干扰,而对抑郁影响最小。在协助LCS完成剖面完井方面没有发现任何挑战。供应商一致认为,promise -29在确定生活质量问题方面发挥了重要作用。结论:为lcs量身定制的生活质量筛选方案提高了识别生活质量问题的依从性和可靠性。对护理的启示:使用promise -29的生活质量筛选程序可以改善患者与提供者的互动和基于价值的肿瘤护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS) to Identify Physical and Psychosocial Quality of Life Issues in Lung Cancer Survivors.

Background: Lung cancer survivors (LCS) are living longer due to improved screening and treatment but often experience long-term treatment effects. Due to a traditionally poor prognosis, research related to LCS symptomology and associated quality of life (QOL) is lacking. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a process for identifying symptomology and unmet needs affecting QOL in LCS. Methods: A literature review identified recommended methods of implementing a QOL screening program in LCS. Training guidelines using the best evidence were presented to the survivorship clinic (SC) staff. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS-29) profile was used to collect data from LCS. The experience of the SC staff (N = 2) and providers (N = 2) in implementing the QOL screening program in LCS was assessed. Results: A 100% compliance rate in completing the PROMIS-29 profile was achieved. Physical function and pain interference were the most impacted QOL domains identified by LCS, while depression was the least. No challenges were identified in assisting LCS with profile completion. Providers agreed that the PROMIS-29 was instrumental in identifying QOL issues. Conclusion: A QOL screening program tailored to LCS-improved compliance and reliability in identifying QOL issues. Implications for Nursing: A QOL screening program using the PROMIS-29 may improve patient-provider interactions and value-based oncology care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of a Virtual Seminar Series for Doctor of Nursing Students to Promote Advanced Nursing Practice. Effect of Cold Vapor Application on Postoperative Sore Throat, Dry Throat, and Difficulty Swallowing: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Improving Person-Centered Depression Screening and Care in an Urban Faith-Based Community. Interactive Nursing Education to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding. Increasing Effective Primary Care Screenings in the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Health Community Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1