与一线贝伐单抗治疗卵巢癌症相关的现实世界结果

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Cancer Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100421
Josee-Lyne Ethier , Weidong Kong , Helen J. MacKay , Jacob McGee , Christopher M. Booth
{"title":"与一线贝伐单抗治疗卵巢癌症相关的现实世界结果","authors":"Josee-Lyne Ethier ,&nbsp;Weidong Kong ,&nbsp;Helen J. MacKay ,&nbsp;Jacob McGee ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Booth","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the pivotal ICON7 study, addition of bevacizumab to front-line treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) (p = 0.03) in a high-risk subgroup of patients with suboptimally debulked/unresectable stage III or IV disease, leading to approval in Ontario, Canada in March 2016. Here we describe utilization of bevacizumab for front-line, high-risk OC and determine outcomes in routine clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Provincial administrative databases were utilized to identify all patients treated with front-line bevacizumab following its approval. Median OS (mOS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with OS were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model. A comparative effectiveness analysis was performed to determine mOS pre- (2006–2016) and post- (2016–2019) approval.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From March 2016 to October 2019, 282 patients received bevacizumab. Mean age was 64 years old, and 58% had stage IV disease. Median survival was 29 months and was longer in stage III (37 months) compared to stage IV disease (28 months). In a comparative effectiveness analysis of patients with stage IV serous OC, post-approval uptake of bevacizumab was low (23%). Median OS was similar pre (26 months) and post (27 months) approval (HR 0.92, 0.75–1.12, p = 0.383).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Survival in real-world patients treated with front-line bevacizumab is shorter than in pivotal clinical trials. Survival in stage IV serous patients has not significantly improved post public reimbursement of bevacizumab. This analysis was limited by poor uptake, however mOS was similar in patients who did and did not receive bevacizumab.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world outcomes associated with use of front-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer\",\"authors\":\"Josee-Lyne Ethier ,&nbsp;Weidong Kong ,&nbsp;Helen J. MacKay ,&nbsp;Jacob McGee ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Booth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In the pivotal ICON7 study, addition of bevacizumab to front-line treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) (p = 0.03) in a high-risk subgroup of patients with suboptimally debulked/unresectable stage III or IV disease, leading to approval in Ontario, Canada in March 2016. Here we describe utilization of bevacizumab for front-line, high-risk OC and determine outcomes in routine clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Provincial administrative databases were utilized to identify all patients treated with front-line bevacizumab following its approval. Median OS (mOS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with OS were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model. A comparative effectiveness analysis was performed to determine mOS pre- (2006–2016) and post- (2016–2019) approval.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From March 2016 to October 2019, 282 patients received bevacizumab. Mean age was 64 years old, and 58% had stage IV disease. Median survival was 29 months and was longer in stage III (37 months) compared to stage IV disease (28 months). In a comparative effectiveness analysis of patients with stage IV serous OC, post-approval uptake of bevacizumab was low (23%). Median OS was similar pre (26 months) and post (27 months) approval (HR 0.92, 0.75–1.12, p = 0.383).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Survival in real-world patients treated with front-line bevacizumab is shorter than in pivotal clinical trials. Survival in stage IV serous patients has not significantly improved post public reimbursement of bevacizumab. This analysis was limited by poor uptake, however mOS was similar in patients who did and did not receive bevacizumab.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000383\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538323000383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景在关键的ICON7研究中,在卵巢癌症(OC)的一线治疗中加入贝伐单抗显著提高了患有次理想减阻/不可切除III或IV期疾病的高危亚组患者的总生存率(OS)(p=0.03),并于2016年3月在加拿大安大略省获得批准。在这里,我们描述了贝伐单抗在一线高危OC中的应用,并确定了常规临床实践的结果。方法使用省级行政数据库来确定所有在贝伐单抗获批后接受一线贝伐单抗治疗的患者。使用Kaplan-Meier方法测定中位OS(mOS)。使用Cox比例风险模型确定与OS相关的因素。进行了比较有效性分析,以确定mOS批准前(2006–2016)和批准后(2016–2019)。结果2016年3月至2019年10月,282名患者接受了贝伐单抗治疗。平均年龄64岁,58%患有IV期疾病。中位生存期为29个月,III期(37个月)比IV期(28个月)更长。在对IV期浆液性OC患者的比较有效性分析中,批准后贝伐单抗的摄取量较低(23%)。中位OS在批准前(26个月)和批准后(27个月)相似(HR 0.92,0.75–1.12,p=0.383)。结论接受一线贝伐单抗治疗的真实世界患者的生存期比关键临床试验更短。IV期浆液性患者的生存率在贝伐单抗公开报销后没有显著改善。该分析受到摄取不良的限制,但接受和未接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者的mOS相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-world outcomes associated with use of front-line bevacizumab in ovarian cancer

Background

In the pivotal ICON7 study, addition of bevacizumab to front-line treatment of ovarian cancer (OC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) (p = 0.03) in a high-risk subgroup of patients with suboptimally debulked/unresectable stage III or IV disease, leading to approval in Ontario, Canada in March 2016. Here we describe utilization of bevacizumab for front-line, high-risk OC and determine outcomes in routine clinical practice.

Methods

Provincial administrative databases were utilized to identify all patients treated with front-line bevacizumab following its approval. Median OS (mOS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with OS were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model. A comparative effectiveness analysis was performed to determine mOS pre- (2006–2016) and post- (2016–2019) approval.

Results

From March 2016 to October 2019, 282 patients received bevacizumab. Mean age was 64 years old, and 58% had stage IV disease. Median survival was 29 months and was longer in stage III (37 months) compared to stage IV disease (28 months). In a comparative effectiveness analysis of patients with stage IV serous OC, post-approval uptake of bevacizumab was low (23%). Median OS was similar pre (26 months) and post (27 months) approval (HR 0.92, 0.75–1.12, p = 0.383).

Conclusions

Survival in real-world patients treated with front-line bevacizumab is shorter than in pivotal clinical trials. Survival in stage IV serous patients has not significantly improved post public reimbursement of bevacizumab. This analysis was limited by poor uptake, however mOS was similar in patients who did and did not receive bevacizumab.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Palliative Care in Turkey: Insights from experts through key informant interviews Is health-related quality of life sufficiently addressed in trials for breast cancer treatments? An assessment based on reimbursement opinions from the French health technology assessment body, 2009–2023 Shaping the future research agenda of Cancer Nursing in Italy: Insights and strategic directions Emergency and non-emergency routes to cancer diagnoses in 2020 and 2021: A Population-based study of 154,863 patients Artificial Intelligence and cancer: Profile of registered clinical trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1