{"title":"安全,快速,最小辅助显微外科吻合联合开环缝合和空中捆绑:临床和实验研究。","authors":"Gökhan Sert, Ahmet Hamdi Sakarya","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2023.79702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The continuous open-loop technique accelerates anastomosis and eliminates the risk of inadvertently catching the back wall, which is the primary cause of technical failure when using interrupted sutures in microsurgical anastomosis. Combined with airborne suture tying, the total anastomosis time is significantly reduced. We conducted an experimental and clinical study to compare this combination to the conventional technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experimentally, anastomoses were performed on the femoral arteries (0.60 mm) of rats in two groups. The control group used simple interrupted suturing with conventional tying, while the experimental group employed open-loop suturing with air-borne tying. We recorded the total time taken for anastomosis completion and patency rates. Clinically, we retrospectively analyzed replantation and free flap transfer cases using the open-loop suture and airborne tying technique for arterial and venous microvascular anastomoses, assessing total anastomosis time and patency rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experimentally, a total of 40 anastomoses were performed in two groups. The control group required 779.65 seconds, and the experimental group needed 527.4 seconds for anastomosis completion; this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Immediate and long-term patency rates were similar (p=0.5483). Clinically, 18 replantations were performed on 16 patients, and 17 free flap transfers were performed on 15 patients, totaling 104 anastomoses. The anastomosis success rate was 94.2% (33 of 35) for free flap transfers and 95.1% (39 of 41) for replantation cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The open-loop suture technique with airborne knot tying allows surgeons to complete microvascular anastomoses safely and in less time with minimal assistance when compared to the simple interrupted suture technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":49398,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery","volume":"29 4","pages":"449-457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/a8/TJTES-29-449.PMC10214895.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe, fast, and minimally-assisted microsurgical anastomosis with combined open-loop suturing and airborne tying: a clinical and experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Gökhan Sert, Ahmet Hamdi Sakarya\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/tjtes.2023.79702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The continuous open-loop technique accelerates anastomosis and eliminates the risk of inadvertently catching the back wall, which is the primary cause of technical failure when using interrupted sutures in microsurgical anastomosis. Combined with airborne suture tying, the total anastomosis time is significantly reduced. We conducted an experimental and clinical study to compare this combination to the conventional technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experimentally, anastomoses were performed on the femoral arteries (0.60 mm) of rats in two groups. The control group used simple interrupted suturing with conventional tying, while the experimental group employed open-loop suturing with air-borne tying. We recorded the total time taken for anastomosis completion and patency rates. Clinically, we retrospectively analyzed replantation and free flap transfer cases using the open-loop suture and airborne tying technique for arterial and venous microvascular anastomoses, assessing total anastomosis time and patency rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experimentally, a total of 40 anastomoses were performed in two groups. The control group required 779.65 seconds, and the experimental group needed 527.4 seconds for anastomosis completion; this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Immediate and long-term patency rates were similar (p=0.5483). Clinically, 18 replantations were performed on 16 patients, and 17 free flap transfers were performed on 15 patients, totaling 104 anastomoses. The anastomosis success rate was 94.2% (33 of 35) for free flap transfers and 95.1% (39 of 41) for replantation cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The open-loop suture technique with airborne knot tying allows surgeons to complete microvascular anastomoses safely and in less time with minimal assistance when compared to the simple interrupted suture technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"449-457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/a8/TJTES-29-449.PMC10214895.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.79702\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.79702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safe, fast, and minimally-assisted microsurgical anastomosis with combined open-loop suturing and airborne tying: a clinical and experimental study.
Background: The continuous open-loop technique accelerates anastomosis and eliminates the risk of inadvertently catching the back wall, which is the primary cause of technical failure when using interrupted sutures in microsurgical anastomosis. Combined with airborne suture tying, the total anastomosis time is significantly reduced. We conducted an experimental and clinical study to compare this combination to the conventional technique.
Methods: Experimentally, anastomoses were performed on the femoral arteries (0.60 mm) of rats in two groups. The control group used simple interrupted suturing with conventional tying, while the experimental group employed open-loop suturing with air-borne tying. We recorded the total time taken for anastomosis completion and patency rates. Clinically, we retrospectively analyzed replantation and free flap transfer cases using the open-loop suture and airborne tying technique for arterial and venous microvascular anastomoses, assessing total anastomosis time and patency rates.
Results: Experimentally, a total of 40 anastomoses were performed in two groups. The control group required 779.65 seconds, and the experimental group needed 527.4 seconds for anastomosis completion; this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Immediate and long-term patency rates were similar (p=0.5483). Clinically, 18 replantations were performed on 16 patients, and 17 free flap transfers were performed on 15 patients, totaling 104 anastomoses. The anastomosis success rate was 94.2% (33 of 35) for free flap transfers and 95.1% (39 of 41) for replantation cases.
Conclusion: The open-loop suture technique with airborne knot tying allows surgeons to complete microvascular anastomoses safely and in less time with minimal assistance when compared to the simple interrupted suture technique.
期刊介绍:
The Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (TJTES) is an official publication of the Turkish Association of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. It is a double-blind and peer-reviewed periodical that considers for publication clinical and experimental studies, case reports, technical contributions, and letters to the editor. Scope of the journal covers the trauma and emergency surgery.
Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in their fields in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent reviewer to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions.