安全,快速,最小辅助显微外科吻合联合开环缝合和空中捆绑:临床和实验研究。

Gökhan Sert, Ahmet Hamdi Sakarya
{"title":"安全,快速,最小辅助显微外科吻合联合开环缝合和空中捆绑:临床和实验研究。","authors":"Gökhan Sert,&nbsp;Ahmet Hamdi Sakarya","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2023.79702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The continuous open-loop technique accelerates anastomosis and eliminates the risk of inadvertently catching the back wall, which is the primary cause of technical failure when using interrupted sutures in microsurgical anastomosis. Combined with airborne suture tying, the total anastomosis time is significantly reduced. We conducted an experimental and clinical study to compare this combination to the conventional technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experimentally, anastomoses were performed on the femoral arteries (0.60 mm) of rats in two groups. The control group used simple interrupted suturing with conventional tying, while the experimental group employed open-loop suturing with air-borne tying. We recorded the total time taken for anastomosis completion and patency rates. Clinically, we retrospectively analyzed replantation and free flap transfer cases using the open-loop suture and airborne tying technique for arterial and venous microvascular anastomoses, assessing total anastomosis time and patency rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experimentally, a total of 40 anastomoses were performed in two groups. The control group required 779.65 seconds, and the experimental group needed 527.4 seconds for anastomosis completion; this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Immediate and long-term patency rates were similar (p=0.5483). Clinically, 18 replantations were performed on 16 patients, and 17 free flap transfers were performed on 15 patients, totaling 104 anastomoses. The anastomosis success rate was 94.2% (33 of 35) for free flap transfers and 95.1% (39 of 41) for replantation cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The open-loop suture technique with airborne knot tying allows surgeons to complete microvascular anastomoses safely and in less time with minimal assistance when compared to the simple interrupted suture technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":49398,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery","volume":"29 4","pages":"449-457"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/a8/TJTES-29-449.PMC10214895.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe, fast, and minimally-assisted microsurgical anastomosis with combined open-loop suturing and airborne tying: a clinical and experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Gökhan Sert,&nbsp;Ahmet Hamdi Sakarya\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/tjtes.2023.79702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The continuous open-loop technique accelerates anastomosis and eliminates the risk of inadvertently catching the back wall, which is the primary cause of technical failure when using interrupted sutures in microsurgical anastomosis. Combined with airborne suture tying, the total anastomosis time is significantly reduced. We conducted an experimental and clinical study to compare this combination to the conventional technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Experimentally, anastomoses were performed on the femoral arteries (0.60 mm) of rats in two groups. The control group used simple interrupted suturing with conventional tying, while the experimental group employed open-loop suturing with air-borne tying. We recorded the total time taken for anastomosis completion and patency rates. Clinically, we retrospectively analyzed replantation and free flap transfer cases using the open-loop suture and airborne tying technique for arterial and venous microvascular anastomoses, assessing total anastomosis time and patency rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experimentally, a total of 40 anastomoses were performed in two groups. The control group required 779.65 seconds, and the experimental group needed 527.4 seconds for anastomosis completion; this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Immediate and long-term patency rates were similar (p=0.5483). Clinically, 18 replantations were performed on 16 patients, and 17 free flap transfers were performed on 15 patients, totaling 104 anastomoses. The anastomosis success rate was 94.2% (33 of 35) for free flap transfers and 95.1% (39 of 41) for replantation cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The open-loop suture technique with airborne knot tying allows surgeons to complete microvascular anastomoses safely and in less time with minimal assistance when compared to the simple interrupted suture technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"449-457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/a8/TJTES-29-449.PMC10214895.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.79702\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.79702","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:连续开环技术加快了吻合速度,消除了误抓后壁的风险,这是显微外科吻合中使用间断缝合时技术失败的主要原因。结合空中缝合,可明显缩短总吻合时间。我们进行了一项实验和临床研究,将这种组合与传统技术进行比较。方法:实验采用两组大鼠0.60 mm股动脉吻合术。对照组采用简单间断缝合常规打结,实验组采用开环缝合气动打结。我们记录吻合完成所需的总时间和通畅率。临床上,我们回顾性分析了应用开环缝合和空气系扎技术进行动脉和静脉微血管吻合的再植和游离皮瓣转移病例,评估了总吻合时间和通畅率。结果:实验两组共吻合40例。对照组需要779.65秒,实验组需要527.4秒完成吻合;结论:与简单的间断缝合技术相比,空中打结的开环缝合技术可以使外科医生在最少的辅助下安全、短时间内完成微血管吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safe, fast, and minimally-assisted microsurgical anastomosis with combined open-loop suturing and airborne tying: a clinical and experimental study.

Background: The continuous open-loop technique accelerates anastomosis and eliminates the risk of inadvertently catching the back wall, which is the primary cause of technical failure when using interrupted sutures in microsurgical anastomosis. Combined with airborne suture tying, the total anastomosis time is significantly reduced. We conducted an experimental and clinical study to compare this combination to the conventional technique.

Methods: Experimentally, anastomoses were performed on the femoral arteries (0.60 mm) of rats in two groups. The control group used simple interrupted suturing with conventional tying, while the experimental group employed open-loop suturing with air-borne tying. We recorded the total time taken for anastomosis completion and patency rates. Clinically, we retrospectively analyzed replantation and free flap transfer cases using the open-loop suture and airborne tying technique for arterial and venous microvascular anastomoses, assessing total anastomosis time and patency rates.

Results: Experimentally, a total of 40 anastomoses were performed in two groups. The control group required 779.65 seconds, and the experimental group needed 527.4 seconds for anastomosis completion; this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Immediate and long-term patency rates were similar (p=0.5483). Clinically, 18 replantations were performed on 16 patients, and 17 free flap transfers were performed on 15 patients, totaling 104 anastomoses. The anastomosis success rate was 94.2% (33 of 35) for free flap transfers and 95.1% (39 of 41) for replantation cases.

Conclusion: The open-loop suture technique with airborne knot tying allows surgeons to complete microvascular anastomoses safely and in less time with minimal assistance when compared to the simple interrupted suture technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (TJTES) is an official publication of the Turkish Association of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. It is a double-blind and peer-reviewed periodical that considers for publication clinical and experimental studies, case reports, technical contributions, and letters to the editor. Scope of the journal covers the trauma and emergency surgery. Each submission will be reviewed by at least two external, independent peer reviewers who are experts in their fields in order to ensure an unbiased evaluation process. The editorial board will invite an external and independent reviewer to manage the evaluation processes of manuscripts submitted by editors or by the editorial board members of the journal. The Editor in Chief is the final authority in the decision-making process for all submissions.
期刊最新文献
Selection for antimicrobial prophylaxis in emergency and elective transurethral procedures: Susceptibility pattern in Türkiye. The comparison of the suture materials on intestinal anastomotic healing: an experimental study. Research of Importance of Thiol, CRP and Lactate in Diagnosing Mesenteric Ischemia At An Early Stage: Animal Model. Trauma in pregnancy: An analysis of the adverse perinatal outcomes and the injury severity score. Is diagnostic laparoscopy necessary in the management of left thoracoabdominal stab wounds?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1