Fenna M Jansen, Reinier C A van Linschoten, Wietske Kievit, Lisa J T Smits, Renske W M Pauwels, Dirk J de Jong, Annemarie C de Vries, Paul J Boekema, Rachel L West, Alexander G L Bodelier, Ingrid A M Gisbertz, Frank H J Wolfhagen, Tessa E H Römkens, Maurice W M D Lutgens, Adriaan A van Bodegraven, Bas Oldenburg, Marieke J Pierik, Maurice G V M Russel, Nanne K de Boer, Rosalie C Mallant-Hent, Pieter C J Ter Borg, Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong, Jeroen M Jansen, Sita V Jansen, Adrianus C I T L Tan, Frank Hoentjen, C Janneke van der Woude
{"title":"克罗恩病患者稳定缓解期增加阿达木单抗剂量间隔的成本-效果分析:随机对照LADI试验","authors":"Fenna M Jansen, Reinier C A van Linschoten, Wietske Kievit, Lisa J T Smits, Renske W M Pauwels, Dirk J de Jong, Annemarie C de Vries, Paul J Boekema, Rachel L West, Alexander G L Bodelier, Ingrid A M Gisbertz, Frank H J Wolfhagen, Tessa E H Römkens, Maurice W M D Lutgens, Adriaan A van Bodegraven, Bas Oldenburg, Marieke J Pierik, Maurice G V M Russel, Nanne K de Boer, Rosalie C Mallant-Hent, Pieter C J Ter Borg, Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong, Jeroen M Jansen, Sita V Jansen, Adrianus C I T L Tan, Frank Hoentjen, C Janneke van der Woude","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [n = 113] and control [n = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: -0.017, 95% confidence interval [-0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (-€943, [-€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (-€2545, [-€2780; -€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost-utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [-€2099; €2050], €69 [-€2908; €1965] and -€455 [-€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.</p>","PeriodicalId":15547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohns & Colitis","volume":" ","pages":"1771-1780"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Increased Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Crohn's Disease Patients in Stable Remission: The Randomized Controlled LADI Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Fenna M Jansen, Reinier C A van Linschoten, Wietske Kievit, Lisa J T Smits, Renske W M Pauwels, Dirk J de Jong, Annemarie C de Vries, Paul J Boekema, Rachel L West, Alexander G L Bodelier, Ingrid A M Gisbertz, Frank H J Wolfhagen, Tessa E H Römkens, Maurice W M D Lutgens, Adriaan A van Bodegraven, Bas Oldenburg, Marieke J Pierik, Maurice G V M Russel, Nanne K de Boer, Rosalie C Mallant-Hent, Pieter C J Ter Borg, Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong, Jeroen M Jansen, Sita V Jansen, Adrianus C I T L Tan, Frank Hoentjen, C Janneke van der Woude\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [n = 113] and control [n = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: -0.017, 95% confidence interval [-0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (-€943, [-€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (-€2545, [-€2780; -€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost-utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [-€2099; €2050], €69 [-€2908; €1965] and -€455 [-€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohns & Colitis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1771-1780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10673815/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohns & Colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad101\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohns & Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Increased Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Crohn's Disease Patients in Stable Remission: The Randomized Controlled LADI Trial.
Background and aims: We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission.
Design: We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels.
Results: We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [n = 113] and control [n = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: -0.017, 95% confidence interval [-0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (-€943, [-€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (-€2545, [-€2780; -€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost-utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [-€2099; €2050], €69 [-€2908; €1965] and -€455 [-€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective.
Conclusion: When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission.
Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Crohns and Colitis is concerned with the dissemination of knowledge on clinical, basic science and innovative methods related to inflammatory bowel diseases. The journal publishes original articles, review papers, editorials, leading articles, viewpoints, case reports, innovative methods and letters to the editor.